Seat Exeo ST · Facelift 2011
Car comparison
Seat Exeo ST · Facelift 2011 2.0 TSIvsVolvo V50 · Facelift 2007 2.5 T5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo V50 · Facelift 2007
2.5 T5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Fastest top speed239 km/h149 mph
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.0 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions162 g/km
- Best estimated range1,000 km621 mi
- Largest trunk422 L
- Best economy score88/100
- Best practicality score81/100
Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.5 T5
- Most powerful230 hp172 kW
- Lightest1,430 kg3,153 lb
- Best power-to-weight161 hp/t120 kW/t6.2 kg/hp
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score54/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 211hp157kW | 230hp172kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,490kg3,285lb | 1,430kg3,153lb |
| Gross weight | 2,050kg4,519lb | 2,000kg4,409lb |
| Top speed | 239 km/h 149 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 71.4s99% target: 237 km/h / 147 mph Calculated | 67.5s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.4s Calculated | 26.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK | 13.5L/100 km17.4mpg US20.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 142hp/t106kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated | 161hp/t120kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated | 224Nm/t150lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,000km621mi Calculated | 653km406mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 2,521cc154cu in |
| Length | 4,666mm184in | 4,522mm178in |
| Width | 1,772mm70in | 1,770mm70in |
| Height | 1,454mm57in | 1,457mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,642mm104in | 2,640mm104in |
| Front track | 1,522mm60in | 1,535mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,523mm60in | 1,531mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 422L | 417L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,354L | 1,307L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 62L |
| CO2 emissions | 162g/km | 227g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.5 T5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 4,600-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,600 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-5,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.4 s | 26.7 s |
| Top speed | 239 km/h 149 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 211 hp 157 kW |
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 230 hp 172 kW |
Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.5 T5 has 19 hp more than Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI and Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.5 T5: 19 hp (14 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 1,490 kg 3,285 lb |
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 239 km/h 149 mph |
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 7.3 s |
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 7.3 s |
Although Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.5 T5 has more power, Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI and Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.5 T5: 2.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 1,000 km 621 mi |
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 653 km 406 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 211 hp 157 kW | 7.3 s | 239 km/h 149 mph |
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 230 hp 172 kW | 7.3 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI |
| 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 |
| 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 211 hp 157 kW | 230 hp 172 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 239 km/h 149 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,490 kg 3,285 lb | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,000 km 621 mi | 653 km 406 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 162 g/km | 227 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 422 L 14.9 cu ft | 417 L 14.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI | Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.5 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK | 9.5 L/100 km24.8 mpg US29.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.25 LC100 km | 16.63 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.71 LC100 mi | 26.76 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal | 1,425 L376 US gal313 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,838 LC/year | 2,494 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 347 km (216 mi) more estimated range
- Has 5 L more trunk volume
- Emits 65 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.5 T5
- Has 19 hp more
- Is 60 kg lighter
- Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























