Car comparison

Seat Exeo ST · Facelift 2011 2.0 TSIvsSkoda Octavia II Combi · Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Seat Exeo ST · Facelift 2011

2.0 TSI

211 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedWagon / estate2011-2012
VS

Skoda Octavia II Combi · Facelift 2009

RS 2.0 TSI

200 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedWagon / estate2009-2013

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.3 s
  • Fastest top speed
    239 km/h
    149 mph
  • Most powerful
    211 hp
    157 kW
  • Highest torque
    320 Nm
    236 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    142 hp/t
    106 kW/t
    7.1 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.0 L/100 km
    33.6 mpg US
    40.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    9.7 L/100 km
    24.2 mpg US
    29.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.4 L/100 km
    43.6 mpg US
    52.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,000 km
    621 mi
  • Best performance score
    53/100
  • Best economy score
    88/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSISkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI
Power
211hp157kW
200hp149kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
280Nm207lb-ft
Curb weight
1,490kg3,285lb
1,465kg3,230lb
Gross weight
2,050kg4,519lb
1,945kg4,288lb
Top speed
239 km/h
149 mph
239 km/h
149 mph
To 99% top speed
71.5s99% target: 237 km/h / 147 mph
Calculated
72.1s99% target: 237 km/h / 147 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.3s
7.3s
0-200 km/h
26.5s
Calculated
26.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.0s
Calculated
7.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK
10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.2s
Calculated
15.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
142hp/t106kW/t64hp/1000 lb
Calculated
137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton
Calculated
191Nm/t128lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,000km621mi
Calculated
733km456mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,666mm184in
4,599mm181in
Width
1,772mm70in
1,769mm70in
Height
1,454mm57in
1,451mm57in
Wheelbase
2,642mm104in
2,578mm101in
Front track
1,522mm60in
1,528mm60in
Rear track
1,523mm60in
1,508mm59in
Ground clearance-
128mm5in
Trunk volume
422L
605L
Max trunk volume
1,354L
1,655L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
70L
55L
CO2 emissions
162g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSISkoda Octavia II Combi Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSIPowerTorque
  • Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Skoda Octavia II Combi Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI4,600-6,000 rpm1,500-4,600 rpm6,250 rpm
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI5,100-6,000 rpm1,700-5,000 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSISkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.0 s
7.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.3 s
7.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
26.5 s
26.6 s
Top speed
239 km/h
149 mph
239 km/h
149 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.1 s
10.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.9 s
12.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.2 s
15.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
158 km/h
98 mph
157 km/h
98 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
211 hp
157 kW
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI
200 hp
149 kW

Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI has 11 hp more than Skoda Octavia II Combi Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Skoda Octavia II Combi Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSI and Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI: 11 hp (8 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI
280 Nm
207 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
1,490 kg
3,285 lb
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI
1,465 kg
3,230 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
239 km/h
149 mph
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI
239 km/h
149 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI7.3 s
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI7.3 s

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI and Skoda Octavia II Combi Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSI: 0.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
142 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI
137 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
1,000 km
621 mi
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI
733 km
456 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
211 hp
157 kW
7.3 s
239 km/h
149 mph
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI
200 hp
149 kW
7.3 s
239 km/h
149 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
Power
211 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
239 km/h
149 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
422 L
14.9 cu ft
Length
4,666 mm
183.7 in
Height
1,454 mm
57.2 in
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
239 km/h
149 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
605 L
21.4 cu ft
Length
4,599 mm
181.1 in
Height
1,451 mm
57.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
Power
211 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
239 km/h
149 mph
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
239 km/h
149 mph
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK

Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
7.3 s
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
7.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
142 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI
137 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSISkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI
Power
211 hp
157 kW
200 hp
149 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.3 s
7.3 s
Top speed
239 km/h
149 mph
239 km/h
149 mph
Lightness
1,490 kg
3,285 lb
1,465 kg
3,230 lb
Fuel consumption
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
422 L
14.9 cu ft
Length
4,666 mm
183.7 in
Height
1,454 mm
57.2 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
605 L
21.4 cu ft
Length
4,599 mm
181.1 in
Height
1,451 mm
57.1 in
Range score
1,000 km
621 mi
733 km
456 mi
CO2 score
162 g/km
-
Trunk score
422 L
14.9 cu ft
605 L
21.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
142 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
137 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSeat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSISkoda Octavia II Combi Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSI
Consumption7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.25 LC100 km13.13 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi19.71 LC100 mi21.12 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,838 LC/year1,969 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI

  • Has 11 hp more
  • Has 40 Nm more
  • Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 267 km (166 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI
Skoda Octavia II Combi RS 2.0 TSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsSeatExeo ST2.0 TSI
RS 2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSIvsSeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsSeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsSeatExeo2.0 TSI
RS 2.0 TSI
2.4 i-VTEC
VS
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSIvsHondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC
2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsSeatLeon III ST2.0 TDI
RS 2.0 TSI
GT 2.0 TCe
VS
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSIvsRenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe
2.0 TSI
1.8 TSI
VS
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsSeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI
RS 2.0 TSI
Cooper S 1.6
VS
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSIvsMiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6
2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsSeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI
RS 2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B7)2.0 TSI
RS 2.0 TSI
2.0 T
VS
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSIvsCadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
Seat Exeo ST · Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI vs Skoda Octavia II Combi · Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster