Car comparison

Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5vsSeat Exeo ST · Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo V70 III

2.0 T5

240 hp1999 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedWagon / estate2011-2013
VS

Seat Exeo ST · Facelift 2011

2.0 TSI

200 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedWagon / estate2011-2012

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5

  • Fastest top speed
    235 km/h
    146 mph
  • Most powerful
    240 hp
    179 kW
  • Highest torque
    320 Nm
    236 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    133 hp/t
    99 kW/t
    7.5 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    575 L
  • Best overall score
    63/100
  • Best performance score
    51/100
  • Best practicality score
    87/100

Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.6 s
  • Lightest
    1,515 kg
    3,340 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.7 L/100 km
    30.5 mpg US
    36.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    179 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    909 km
    565 mi
  • Best economy score
    86/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoV70 III2.0 T5SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
Power
240hp179kW
200hp149kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
280Nm207lb-ft
Curb weight
1,806kg3,982lb
1,515kg3,340lb
Gross weight
2,410kg5,313lb
2,075kg4,575lb
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
230 km/h
143 mph
To 99% top speed
83.0s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
71.7s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.9s
7.6s
0-200 km/h
31.1s
Calculated
29.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.5s
Calculated
7.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.7s
Calculated
15.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb
Calculated
132hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
177Nm/t119lb-ft/ton
Calculated
185Nm/t124lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
833km518mi
Calculated
909km565mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,999cc122cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,823mm190in
4,666mm184in
Width
1,907mm75in
1,772mm70in
Height
1,547mm61in
1,454mm57in
Wheelbase
2,816mm111in
2,642mm104in
Front track
1,588mm63in
1,522mm60in
Rear track
1,586mm62in
1,523mm60in
Ground clearance
151mm6in
-
Trunk volume
575L
422L
Max trunk volume-
1,354L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
70L
70L
CO2 emissions
195g/km
179g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSIPowerTorque
  • Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
  • Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolvoV70 III2.0 T55,500 rpm1,800-4,980 rpm6,500 rpm
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI5,100 rpm1,800 rpm5,350 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoV70 III2.0 T5SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.5 s
7.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.9 s
7.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
31.1 s
29.8 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
230 km/h
143 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.4 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.3 s
13.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.7 s
15.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
151 km/h
94 mph
154 km/h
96 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoV70 III2.0 T5
240 hp
179 kW
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
200 hp
149 kW

Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5 has 40 hp more than Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI and Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5: 40 hp (30 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoV70 III2.0 T5
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
280 Nm
207 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoV70 III2.0 T5
1,806 kg
3,982 lb
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
1,515 kg
3,340 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoV70 III2.0 T5
235 km/h
146 mph
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
230 km/h
143 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoV70 III2.0 T57.9 s
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI7.6 s

Although Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5 has more power, Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI and Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoV70 III2.0 T5
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI and Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5: 0.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoV70 III2.0 T5
133 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
132 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoV70 III2.0 T5
833 km
518 mi
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
909 km
565 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoV70 III2.0 T5
240 hp
179 kW
7.9 s
235 km/h
146 mph
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
200 hp
149 kW
7.6 s
230 km/h
143 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoV70 III2.0 T5
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
575 L
20.3 cu ft
Length
4,823 mm
189.9 in
Height
1,547 mm
60.9 in
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
422 L
14.9 cu ft
Length
4,666 mm
183.7 in
Height
1,454 mm
57.2 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolvoV70 III2.0 T5
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK

Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolvoV70 III2.0 T5
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
7.9 s
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
7.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoV70 III2.0 T5
133 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
132 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoV70 III2.0 T5SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
Power
240 hp
179 kW
200 hp
149 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.9 s
7.6 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
230 km/h
143 mph
Lightness
1,806 kg
3,982 lb
1,515 kg
3,340 lb
Fuel consumption
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
575 L
20.3 cu ft
Length
4,823 mm
189.9 in
Height
1,547 mm
60.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
422 L
14.9 cu ft
Length
4,666 mm
183.7 in
Height
1,454 mm
57.2 in
Range score
833 km
518 mi
909 km
565 mi
CO2 score
195 g/km
179 g/km
Trunk score
575 L
20.3 cu ft
422 L
14.9 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
133 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
132 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo V70 III 2.0 T5Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI
Consumption8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.70 LC100 km13.48 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi23.66 LC100 mi21.69 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,205 LC/year2,021 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5

  • Has 40 hp more
  • Has 40 Nm more
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 153 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI

  • Is 291 kg lighter
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 76 km (47 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 16 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5
Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 T5
2.4i 20V T5
VS
VolvoV70 III2.0 T5vsVolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.4i 20V T5
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsSeatExeo ST2.0 TSI
2.0 T5
R 2.5i V20
VS
VolvoV70 III2.0 T5vsVolvoV70 IIR 2.5i V20
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsSeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
2.0 T5
2.5 T5
VS
VolvoV70 III2.0 T5vsVolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsSeatExeo2.0 TSI
2.0 T5
2.4 D5
VS
VolvoV70 III2.0 T5vsVolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5
2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsSeatLeon III ST2.0 TDI
2.0 T5
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoV70 III2.0 T5vsVolvoV902.0 T5
2.0 TSI
1.8 TSI
VS
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsSeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI
2.0 T5
3.0 T6
VS
VolvoV70 III2.0 T5vsVolvoXC70 II3.0 T6
2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsSeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI
Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5 vs Seat Exeo ST · Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster