Car comparison

Seat Exeo · Facelift 2011 2.0 TSIvsVolvo S60 II 2.4 D5

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Seat Exeo · Facelift 2011

2.0 TSI

211 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedSedan2011-2012
VS

Volvo S60 II

2.4 D5

215 hp2400 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2011-2013

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.1 s
  • Fastest top speed
    244 km/h
    152 mph
  • Lightest
    1,430 kg
    3,153 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    148 hp/t
    110 kW/t
    6.8 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    460 L
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best performance score
    55/100
  • Best practicality score
    74/100

Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5

  • Most powerful
    215 hp
    160 kW
  • Highest torque
    440 Nm
    325 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.3 L/100 km
    37.3 mpg US
    44.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    8.5 L/100 km
    27.7 mpg US
    33.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.1 L/100 km
    46.1 mpg US
    55.4 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,071 km
    666 mi
  • Best economy score
    90/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSIVolvoS60 II2.4 D5
Power
211hp157kW
215hp160kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
440Nm325lb-ft
Curb weight
1,430kg3,153lb
1,685kg3,715lb
Gross weight
1,990kg4,387lb
2,200kg4,850lb
Top speed
244 km/h
152 mph
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
65.5s99% target: 242 km/h / 150 mph
Calculated
71.7s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.1s
7.6s
0-200 km/h
23.8s
Calculated
28.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.8s
Calculated
7.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK
8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.0s
Calculated
15.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb
Calculated
128hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
224Nm/t150lb-ft/ton
Calculated
261Nm/t175lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,014km630mi
Calculated
1,071km666mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
2,400cc146cu in
Length
4,661mm184in
4,628mm182in
Width
1,772mm70in
1,865mm73in
Height
1,430mm56in
1,484mm58in
Wheelbase
2,642mm104in
2,776mm109in
Front track
1,522mm60in
1,588mm63in
Rear track
1,523mm60in
1,585mm62in
Ground clearance-
136mm5in
Trunk volume
460L
380L
Max trunk volume
833L
-
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
70L
68L
CO2 emissions
159g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSIVolvo S60 II 2.4 D5PowerTorque
  • Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI4,600-6,000 rpm1,500-4,600 rpm6,250 rpm
VolvoS60 II2.4 D54,000 rpm1,500-3,000 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSIVolvoS60 II2.4 D5
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.8 s
7.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.1 s
7.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
23.8 s
28.1 s
Top speed
244 km/h
152 mph
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.0 s
10.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.7 s
13.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.0 s
15.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
162 km/h
101 mph
155 km/h
97 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
211 hp
157 kW
VolvoS60 II2.4 D5
215 hp
160 kW

Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5 has 4 hp more than Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI and Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5: 4 hp (3 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
VolvoS60 II2.4 D5
440 Nm
325 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
1,430 kg
3,153 lb
VolvoS60 II2.4 D5
1,685 kg
3,715 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
244 km/h
152 mph
VolvoS60 II2.4 D5
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI7.1 s
VolvoS60 II2.4 D57.6 s

Although Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5 has more power, Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI and Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
VolvoS60 II2.4 D5
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5 and Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI: 0.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
148 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
VolvoS60 II2.4 D5
128 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
1,014 km
630 mi
VolvoS60 II2.4 D5
1,071 km
666 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
211 hp
157 kW
7.1 s
244 km/h
152 mph
VolvoS60 II2.4 D5
215 hp
160 kW
7.6 s
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
Power
211 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
244 km/h
152 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
460 L
16.2 cu ft
Length
4,661 mm
183.5 in
Height
1,430 mm
56.3 in
VolvoS60 II2.4 D5
Power
215 hp
160 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,628 mm
182.2 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
Power
211 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
244 km/h
152 mph
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
VolvoS60 II2.4 D5
Power
215 hp
160 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK

Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
7.1 s
VolvoS60 II2.4 D5
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
7.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
148 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
VolvoS60 II2.4 D5
128 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSIVolvoS60 II2.4 D5
Power
211 hp
157 kW
215 hp
160 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
440 Nm
325 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.1 s
7.6 s
Top speed
244 km/h
152 mph
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Lightness
1,430 kg
3,153 lb
1,685 kg
3,715 lb
Fuel consumption
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
460 L
16.2 cu ft
Length
4,661 mm
183.5 in
Height
1,430 mm
56.3 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,628 mm
182.2 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in
Range score
1,014 km
630 mi
1,071 km
666 mi
CO2 score
159 g/km
-
Trunk score
460 L
16.2 cu ft
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
148 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
128 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSeat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSIVolvo S60 II 2.4 D5
Consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.08 LC100 km11.03 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi19.43 LC100 mi17.74 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal945 L250 US gal208 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,811 LC/year1,654 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI

  • Is 255 kg lighter
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 80 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5

  • Has 4 hp more
  • Has 120 Nm more
  • Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 57 km (35 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI
Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsSeatExeo2.0 TSI
2.4 D5
2.4 D5
VS
VolvoS60 II2.4 D5vsVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsSeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
2.4 D5
2.4i T5 20V
VS
VolvoS60 II2.4 D5vsVolvoS602.4i T5 20V
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsSeatExeo ST2.0 TSI
2.4 D5
2.5 T5
VS
VolvoS60 II2.4 D5vsVolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5
2.0 TSI
2.4 D5
VS
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsVolvoS60 II2.4 D5
2.4 D5
2.5 T5
VS
VolvoS60 II2.4 D5vsVolvoS40 II2.5 T5
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsVolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI
2.4 D5
2.5T 20V
VS
VolvoS60 II2.4 D5vsVolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V
2.4 D5
250 V6
VS
VolvoS60 II2.4 D5vsLexusIS II (XE20)Facelift 2010250 V6
2.4 D5
2.4 i-VTEC
VS
VolvoS60 II2.4 D5vsHondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC
Seat Exeo · Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI vs Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5 - car comparison - FastVsFaster