Seat Exeo · Facelift 2011
Car comparison
Seat Exeo · Facelift 2011 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagen Jetta VI 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Jetta VI
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Fastest top speed244 km/h152 mph
- Most powerful211 hp157 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,014 km630 mi
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score55/100
- Best economy score88/100
Volkswagen Jetta VI 2.0 TSI
- Lightest1,361 kg3,000 lb
- Best power-to-weight154 hp/t115 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
- Largest trunk510 L
- Best practicality score75/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI | VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 211hp157kW | 210hp157kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,430kg3,153lb | 1,361kg3,000lb |
| Gross weight | 1,990kg4,387lb | 1,920kg4,233lb |
| Top speed | 244 km/h 152 mph | 243 km/h 151 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 65.5s99% target: 242 km/h / 150 mph Calculated | 65.7s99% target: 241 km/h / 149 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.1s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.8s Calculated | 24.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.0s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 224Nm/t150lb-ft/ton Calculated | 206Nm/t138lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,014km630mi Calculated | 775km481mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,661mm184in | 4,644mm183in |
| Width | 1,772mm70in | 1,778mm70in |
| Height | 1,430mm56in | 1,482mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,642mm104in | 2,651mm104in |
| Front track | 1,522mm60in | 1,535mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,523mm60in | 1,538mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 139mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 460L | 510L |
| Max trunk volume | 833L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 159g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Jetta VI 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 4,600-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,600 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI | 5,300-6,200 rpm | 1,700-5,200 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI | VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.8 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.1 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.8 s | 24.2 s |
| Top speed | 244 km/h 152 mph | 243 km/h 151 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.0 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 162 km/h 101 mph | 161 km/h 100 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 211 hp 157 kW |
| VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI | 210 hp 157 kW |
Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI has 1 hp more than Volkswagen Jetta VI 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Jetta VI 2.0 TSI and Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI: 1 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb |
| VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI | 1,361 kg 3,000 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI | 243 km/h 151 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 7.1 s |
| VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Jetta VI 2.0 TSI: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 1,014 km 630 mi |
| VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI | 775 km 481 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 211 hp 157 kW | 7.1 s | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI | 210 hp 157 kW | 7.2 s | 243 km/h 151 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI |
| 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI |
| 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
| VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI | VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 211 hp 157 kW | 210 hp 157 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.1 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 244 km/h 152 mph | 243 km/h 151 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb | 1,361 kg 3,000 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,014 km 630 mi | 775 km 481 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 159 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | 510 L 18.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI | Volkswagen Jetta VI 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK | 7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.08 LC100 km | 12.42 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi | 20.00 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal | 1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,811 LC/year | 1,864 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI
- Has 1 hp more
- Has 40 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 240 km (149 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Volkswagen Jetta VI 2.0 TSI
- Is 69 kg lighter
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 50 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























