Seat Exeo ST · Facelift 2011
Car comparison
Seat Exeo ST · Facelift 2011 2.0 TSIvsSeat Exeo · Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSeat Exeo · Facelift 2011
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Fastest top speed239 km/h149 mph
- Most powerful211 hp157 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight142 hp/t106 kW/t7.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.0 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions162 g/km
- Best estimated range1,000 km621 mi
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score53/100
- Best economy score88/100
- Best practicality score81/100
Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI
- Lightest1,455 kg3,208 lb
- Largest trunk460 L
Specification comparison
| Model | SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 211hp157kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,490kg3,285lb | 1,455kg3,208lb |
| Gross weight | 2,050kg4,519lb | 2,015kg4,442lb |
| Top speed | 239 km/h 149 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 71.4s99% target: 237 km/h / 147 mph Calculated | 65.0s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.4s Calculated | 26.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 142hp/t106kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated | 137hp/t103kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated | 192Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,000km621mi Calculated | 909km565mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,666mm184in | 4,661mm184in |
| Width | 1,772mm70in | 1,772mm70in |
| Height | 1,454mm57in | 1,430mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,642mm104in | 2,642mm104in |
| Front track | 1,522mm60in | 1,522mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,523mm60in | 1,523mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 422L | 460L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,354L | 833L |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 162g/km | 179g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 4,600-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,600 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 5,100 rpm | 1,800 rpm | 5,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.4 s | 26.1 s |
| Top speed | 239 km/h 149 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 159 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 211 hp 157 kW |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI has 11 hp more than Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI and Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI: 11 hp (8 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 1,490 kg 3,285 lb |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 239 km/h 149 mph |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 7.3 s |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 7.3 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI and Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 137 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 1,000 km 621 mi |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 909 km 565 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 211 hp 157 kW | 7.3 s | 239 km/h 149 mph |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.3 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI |
| 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 137 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 211 hp 157 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 239 km/h 149 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,490 kg 3,285 lb | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,000 km 621 mi | 909 km 565 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 162 g/km | 179 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 422 L 14.9 cu ft | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 137 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI | Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.25 LC100 km | 13.48 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.71 LC100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,838 LC/year | 2,021 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI
- Has 11 hp more
- Has 40 Nm more
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 91 km (56 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 17 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI
- Is 35 kg lighter
- Has 38 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























