Seat Exeo
Car comparison
Seat Exeo 2.0 TSIvsSeat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSeat Exeo ST
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Fastest top speed244 km/h152 mph
- Most powerful211 hp157 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lightest1,505 kg3,318 lb
- Best power-to-weight140 hp/t105 kW/t7.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,014 km630 mi
- Largest trunk460 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score54/100
- Best economy score88/100
Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI
- Best practicality score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SeatExeo2.0 TSI | SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 211hp157kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,505kg3,318lb | 1,515kg3,340lb |
| Gross weight | 1,990kg4,387lb | 2,050kg4,519lb |
| Top speed | 244 km/h 152 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 66.6s99% target: 242 km/h / 150 mph Calculated | 72.0s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.1s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 24.0s Calculated | 29.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.0s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 140hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated | 132hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 213Nm/t142lb-ft/ton Calculated | 185Nm/t124lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,014km630mi Calculated | 909km565mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,661mm184in | 4,666mm184in |
| Width | 1,772mm70in | 1,772mm70in |
| Height | 1,430mm56in | 1,454mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,642mm104in | 2,642mm104in |
| Front track | 1,522mm60in | 1,522mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,523mm60in | 1,523mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 460L | 442L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,354L |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 4,600-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,600 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 5,100 rpm | 1,800 rpm | 5,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SeatExeo2.0 TSI | SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.8 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.1 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 24.0 s | 29.9 s |
| Top speed | 244 km/h 152 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.0 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 162 km/h 100 mph | 154 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 211 hp 157 kW |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI has 11 hp more than Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI and Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI: 11 hp (8 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 1,505 kg 3,318 lb |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 1,515 kg 3,340 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 7.1 s |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 7.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI and Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI and Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI: 0.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 140 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 1,014 km 630 mi |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 909 km 565 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 211 hp 157 kW | 7.1 s | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.6 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI |
| 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 140 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SeatExeo2.0 TSI | SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 211 hp 157 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.1 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 244 km/h 152 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,505 kg 3,318 lb | 1,515 kg 3,340 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,014 km 630 mi | 909 km 565 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | 442 L 15.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 140 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI | Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.08 LC100 km | 13.48 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,811 LC/year | 2,021 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI
- Has 11 hp more
- Has 40 Nm more
- Is 10 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 14 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 105 km (65 mi) more estimated range
- Has 18 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























