Tesla Model S · Facelift 2016
Long Range 100 kWh
541 hpElectricAWDAutomaticLiftback / fastback2019-2021
Car comparison
Tesla Model S · Facelift 2016 Long Range 100 kWhvsSAIC Z7 100 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVS
SAIC Z7
100 kWh
590 hpElectricAWDAutomaticLiftback / fastback2026-present
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Tesla Model S Facelift 2016 Long Range 100 kWh
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest2,201 kg4,852 lb
- Largest trunk745 L
- Best overall score86/100
- Best performance score86/100
- Best economy score0/100
- Best practicality score87/100
SAIC Z7 100 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.4 s
- Most powerful590 hp440 kW
- Highest torque760 Nm561 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight257 hp/t191 kW/t3.9 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Long Range 100 kWh | SAICZ7100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 541hp403kW | 590hp440kW |
| Torque | 755Nm557lb-ft | 760Nm561lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,201kg4,852lb | 2,300kg5,071lb |
| Gross weight | 2,694kg5,939lb | 2,740kg6,041lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 239 km/h 149 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 55.3s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 42.8s99% target: 237 km/h / 147 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.8s | 3.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.2s Calculated | 14.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.6s Calculated | 3.3s Calculated |
| Quarter mile | 11.9s Calculated | 11.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 246hp/t183kW/t111hp/1000 lb Calculated | 257hp/t191kW/t116hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 343Nm/t230lb-ft/ton Calculated | 330Nm/t221lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Length | 4,970mm196in | 5,036mm198in |
| Width | 1,964mm77in | 1,976mm78in |
| Height | 1,445mm57in | 1,445mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,960mm117in | 3,000mm118in |
| Front track | 1,662mm65in | 1,715mm68in |
| Rear track | 1,700mm67in | 1,693mm67in |
| Ground clearance | 160mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 745L | 476L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,645L | 1,499L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Long Range 100 kWh | SAICZ7100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.6 s | 3.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.8 s | 3.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.2 s | 14.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 239 km/h 149 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.9 s | 1.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.1 s | 4.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.7 s | 7.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.0 s | 9.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.9 s | 11.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 187 km/h 116 mph | 187 km/h 116 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Long Range 100 kWh | 541 hp 403 kW |
| SAICZ7100 kWh | 590 hp 440 kW |
SAIC Z7 100 kWh has 49 hp more than Tesla Model S Facelift 2016 Long Range 100 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between Tesla Model S Facelift 2016 Long Range 100 kWh and SAIC Z7 100 kWh: 49 hp (37 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Long Range 100 kWh | 755 Nm 557 lb-ft |
| SAICZ7100 kWh | 760 Nm 561 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Long Range 100 kWh | 2,201 kg 4,852 lb |
| SAICZ7100 kWh | 2,300 kg 5,071 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Long Range 100 kWh | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| SAICZ7100 kWh | 239 km/h 149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Long Range 100 kWh | 3.8 s |
| SAICZ7100 kWh | 3.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between SAIC Z7 100 kWh and Tesla Model S Facelift 2016 Long Range 100 kWh: 0.4 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Long Range 100 kWh | 246 hp/t 183 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp |
| SAICZ7100 kWh | 257 hp/t 191 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Long Range 100 kWh | 541 hp 403 kW | 3.8 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| SAICZ7100 kWh | 590 hp 440 kW | 3.4 s | 239 km/h 149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Long Range 100 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SAICZ7100 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Long Range 100 kWh | SAICZ7100 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 541 hp 403 kW | 590 hp 440 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 755 Nm 557 lb-ft | 760 Nm 561 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.8 s | 3.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 239 km/h 149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,201 kg 4,852 lb | 2,300 kg 5,071 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 745 L 26.3 cu ft | 476 L 16.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 246 hp/t 183 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 257 hp/t 191 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
Tesla Model S Facelift 2016 Long Range 100 kWh
- Is 99 kg lighter
- Has 21 km/h (13 mph) higher top speed
- Has 269 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
SAIC Z7 100 kWh
- Has 49 hp more
- Has 5 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Tesla Model S Long Range 100 kWh
SAIC Z7 100 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected
Popular comparisons
TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Long Range 100 kWhvsTeslaModel SFacelift 2021Long Range 100 kWh
SAICZ7100 kWhvsMercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2026EQS 580 122 kWh
TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Long Range 100 kWhvsTeslaModel SP90D 90 kWh
SAICZ7100 kWhvsLotusEmeya102 kWh
TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Long Range 100 kWhvsAston MartinRapide E65 kWh
SAICZ7100 kWhvsMercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2024AMG EQS 53 125 kWh
TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Long Range 100 kWhvsAUDIRS5 Sportback (F5)2.9 TFSI V6
SAICZ7100 kWhvsAUDIRS7 Sportback (C8)4.0 TFSI V8
SAICZ7100 kWhvsAUDIE5 Sportback83 kWh
TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Long Range 100 kWhvsMercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 580 120 kWh
TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Long Range 100 kWhvsFordMustang VIFacelift 2017Mach 1 5.0 Ti-VCT V8
SAICZ7100 kWhvsTeslaModel SFacelift 2016Performance 100 kWh