Tesla Model S · Facelift 2016
Car comparison
Tesla Model S · Facelift 2016 Long Range 100 kWhvsFord Mustang VI · Facelift 2017 Mach 1 5.0 Ti-VCT V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord Mustang VI · Facelift 2017
Mach 1 5.0 Ti-VCT V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Tesla Model S Facelift 2016 Long Range 100 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.8 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful541 hp403 kW
- Highest torque755 Nm557 lb-ft
- Largest trunk745 L
- Best overall score86/100
- Best performance score86/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Ford Mustang VI Facelift 2017 Mach 1 5.0 Ti-VCT V8
- Lightest1,786 kg3,937 lb
- Best power-to-weight258 hp/t192 kW/t3.9 kg/hp
- Best economy score72/100
Specification comparison
| Model | TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Long Range 100 kWh | FordMustang VIFacelift 2017Mach 1 5.0 Ti-VCT V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 541hp403kW | 460hp343kW |
| Torque | 755Nm557lb-ft | 529Nm390lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,201kg4,852lb | 1,786kg3,937lb |
| Gross weight | 2,694kg5,939lb | 2,150kg4,740lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 249 km/h 155 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 55.3s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 57.9s99% target: 247 km/h / 153 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.8s | 4.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.2s Calculated | 17.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.6s Calculated | 4.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 13.1L/100 km18mpg US21.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 15.7L/100 km15mpg US18.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.9s Calculated | 12.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 246hp/t183kW/t111hp/1000 lb Calculated | 258hp/t192kW/t117hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 343Nm/t230lb-ft/ton Calculated | 296Nm/t198lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 466km289mi Calculated |
| Displacement | - | 5,038cc307cu in |
| Length | 4,970mm196in | 4,797mm189in |
| Width | 1,964mm77in | 1,916mm75in |
| Height | 1,445mm57in | 1,382mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,960mm117in | 2,720mm107in |
| Front track | 1,662mm65in | 1,594mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,700mm67in | 1,646mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 160mm6in | 120mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 745L | 408L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,645L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 2 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | - | 61L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Long Range 100 kWh | FordMustang VIFacelift 2017Mach 1 5.0 Ti-VCT V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.6 s | 4.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.8 s | 4.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.2 s | 17.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 249 km/h 155 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.9 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.1 s | 5.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.7 s | 8.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.0 s | 10.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.9 s | 12.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 187 km/h 116 mph | 178 km/h 111 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Long Range 100 kWh | 541 hp 403 kW |
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017Mach 1 5.0 Ti-VCT V8 | 460 hp 343 kW |
Tesla Model S Facelift 2016 Long Range 100 kWh has 81 hp more than Ford Mustang VI Facelift 2017 Mach 1 5.0 Ti-VCT V8.
The biggest power difference is between Ford Mustang VI Facelift 2017 Mach 1 5.0 Ti-VCT V8 and Tesla Model S Facelift 2016 Long Range 100 kWh: 81 hp (60 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Long Range 100 kWh | 755 Nm 557 lb-ft |
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017Mach 1 5.0 Ti-VCT V8 | 529 Nm 390 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Long Range 100 kWh | 2,201 kg 4,852 lb |
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017Mach 1 5.0 Ti-VCT V8 | 1,786 kg 3,937 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Long Range 100 kWh | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017Mach 1 5.0 Ti-VCT V8 | 249 km/h 155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Long Range 100 kWh | 3.8 s |
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017Mach 1 5.0 Ti-VCT V8 | 4.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Tesla Model S Facelift 2016 Long Range 100 kWh and Ford Mustang VI Facelift 2017 Mach 1 5.0 Ti-VCT V8: 0.6 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Long Range 100 kWh | 246 hp/t 183 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp |
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017Mach 1 5.0 Ti-VCT V8 | 258 hp/t 192 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Long Range 100 kWh | 541 hp 403 kW | 3.8 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017Mach 1 5.0 Ti-VCT V8 | 460 hp 343 kW | 4.4 s | 249 km/h 155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Long Range 100 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017Mach 1 5.0 Ti-VCT V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Long Range 100 kWh | FordMustang VIFacelift 2017Mach 1 5.0 Ti-VCT V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 541 hp 403 kW | 460 hp 343 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 755 Nm 557 lb-ft | 529 Nm 390 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.8 s | 4.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 249 km/h 155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,201 kg 4,852 lb | 1,786 kg 3,937 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 466 km 289 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 745 L 26.3 cu ft | 408 L 14.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 246 hp/t 183 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 258 hp/t 192 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ford Mustang VI Facelift 2017 Mach 1 5.0 Ti-VCT V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 13.1 L/100 km18 mpg US21.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 22.93 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 36.89 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,965 L519 US gal432 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,439 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Tesla Model S Facelift 2016 Long Range 100 kWh
- Has 81 hp more
- Has 226 Nm more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 337 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Ford Mustang VI Facelift 2017 Mach 1 5.0 Ti-VCT V8
- Is 415 kg lighter
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























