Renault Megane IV
Car comparison
Renault Megane IV GT 1.6 Energy TCevsVolvo V40 · Facelift 2016 2.0 D4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo V40 · Facelift 2016
2.0 D4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Renault Megane IV GT 1.6 Energy TCe
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph
- Most powerful205 hp153 kW
- Lightest1,392 kg3,069 lb
- Best power-to-weight147 hp/t110 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Largest trunk384 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.2 L/100 km56.0 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.7 L/100 km63.6 mpg US76.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions109 g/km
- Best estimated range1,476 km917 mi
- Best performance score53/100
- Best economy score95/100
Specification comparison
| Model | RenaultMegane IVGT 1.6 Energy TCe | VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 205hp153kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,392kg3,069lb | 1,503kg3,314lb |
| Gross weight | 1,924kg4,242lb | 2,005kg4,420lb |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 78.1s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 83.0s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.1s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.6s Calculated | 32.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.7s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | 3.7L/100 km63.6mpg US76.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 147hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 201Nm/t135lb-ft/ton Calculated | 266Nm/t178lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 833km518mi Calculated | 1,476km917mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,618cc99cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,359mm172in | 4,369mm172in |
| Width | 1,814mm71in | 1,783mm70in |
| Height | 1,447mm57in | 1,439mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,669mm105in | 2,647mm104in |
| Front track | 1,591mm63in | 1,559mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,586mm62in | 1,546mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 145mm6in | 144mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 384L | 335L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,247L | 1,500L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 62L |
| CO2 emissions | 134g/km | 109g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Renault Megane IV GT 1.6 Energy TCe: Power / Torque
- Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IVGT 1.6 Energy TCe | 6,000 rpm | 2,400 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 4,250 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | RenaultMegane IVGT 1.6 Energy TCe | VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.7 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.1 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.6 s | 32.0 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 153 km/h 95 mph | 152 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IVGT 1.6 Energy TCe | 205 hp 153 kW |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
Renault Megane IV GT 1.6 Energy TCe has 15 hp more than Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4 and Renault Megane IV GT 1.6 Energy TCe: 15 hp (11 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IVGT 1.6 Energy TCe | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IVGT 1.6 Energy TCe | 1,392 kg 3,069 lb |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 1,503 kg 3,314 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IVGT 1.6 Energy TCe | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IVGT 1.6 Energy TCe | 7.1 s |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Renault Megane IV GT 1.6 Energy TCe and Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IVGT 1.6 Energy TCe | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4 and Renault Megane IV GT 1.6 Energy TCe: 1.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IVGT 1.6 Energy TCe | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IVGT 1.6 Energy TCe | 833 km 518 mi |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 1,476 km 917 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IVGT 1.6 Energy TCe | 205 hp 153 kW | 7.1 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.2 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IVGT 1.6 Energy TCe |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IVGT 1.6 Energy TCe |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 |
| 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IVGT 1.6 Energy TCe | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IVGT 1.6 Energy TCe | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | RenaultMegane IVGT 1.6 Energy TCe | VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 205 hp 153 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.1 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,392 kg 3,069 lb | 1,503 kg 3,314 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 833 km 518 mi | 1,476 km 917 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 134 g/km | 109 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 384 L 13.6 cu ft | 335 L 11.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Renault Megane IV GT 1.6 Energy TCe | Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK | 4.2 L/100 km56 mpg US67.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.50 LC100 km | 7.35 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi | 11.83 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal | 630 L166 US gal139 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,575 LC/year | 1,103 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Renault Megane IV GT 1.6 Energy TCe
- Has 15 hp more
- Is 111 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 21 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 49 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4
- Has 120 Nm more
- Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 643 km (399 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 25 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























