Skoda Superb III Combi
Car comparison
Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TSIvsRenault Megane IV Grandtour GT 1.6 Energy TCe
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Megane IV Grandtour
GT 1.6 Energy TCe
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Fastest top speed243 km/h151 mph
- Most powerful220 hp164 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight149 hp/t111 kW/t6.7 kg/hp
- Best estimated range1,015 km631 mi
- Largest trunk660 L
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score55/100
- Best practicality score90/100
Renault Megane IV Grandtour GT 1.6 Energy TCe
- Lightest1,392 kg3,069 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Best economy score91/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TSI | RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy TCe |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 220hp164kW | 205hp153kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,475kg3,252lb | 1,392kg3,069lb |
| Gross weight | 2,130kg4,696lb | 1,924kg4,242lb |
| Top speed | 243 km/h 151 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 72.1s99% target: 241 km/h / 149 mph Calculated | 69.0s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.1s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.3s Calculated | 28.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.0s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 149hp/t111kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated | 147hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 237Nm/t159lb-ft/ton Calculated | 201Nm/t135lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,015km631mi Calculated | 833km518mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,618cc99cu in |
| Length | 4,856mm191in | 4,626mm182in |
| Width | 1,864mm73in | 1,814mm71in |
| Height | 1,477mm58in | 1,457mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,841mm112in | 2,712mm107in |
| Front track | 1,586mm62in | 1,591mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,574mm62in | 1,586mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 149mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 660L | 521L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,950L | 1,504L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 134g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Renault Megane IV Grandtour GT 1.6 Energy TCe: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TSI | 4,500-6,200 rpm | 1,500-4,400 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy TCe | 6,000 rpm | 2,400 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TSI | RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy TCe |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.8 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.1 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.3 s | 28.9 s |
| Top speed | 243 km/h 151 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.0 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 159 km/h 99 mph | 155 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TSI | 220 hp 164 kW |
| RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy TCe | 205 hp 153 kW |
Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TSI has 15 hp more than Renault Megane IV Grandtour GT 1.6 Energy TCe.
The biggest power difference is between Renault Megane IV Grandtour GT 1.6 Energy TCe and Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TSI: 15 hp (11 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy TCe | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TSI | 1,475 kg 3,252 lb |
| RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy TCe | 1,392 kg 3,069 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TSI | 243 km/h 151 mph |
| RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy TCe | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TSI | 7.1 s |
| RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy TCe | 7.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TSI and Renault Megane IV Grandtour GT 1.6 Energy TCe: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TSI | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
| RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy TCe | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Renault Megane IV Grandtour GT 1.6 Energy TCe and Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TSI: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TSI | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
| RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy TCe | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TSI | 1,015 km 631 mi |
| RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy TCe | 833 km 518 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TSI | 220 hp 164 kW | 7.1 s | 243 km/h 151 mph |
| RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy TCe | 205 hp 153 kW | 7.4 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy TCe |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TSI |
| 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy TCe |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TSI | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
| RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy TCe | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TSI | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
| RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy TCe | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TSI | RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy TCe | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 220 hp 164 kW | 205 hp 153 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.1 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 243 km/h 151 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,475 kg 3,252 lb | 1,392 kg 3,069 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,015 km 631 mi | 833 km 518 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 134 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 660 L 23.3 cu ft | 521 L 18.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TSI | Renault Megane IV Grandtour GT 1.6 Energy TCe |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.38 LC100 km | 10.50 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,706 LC/year | 1,575 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TSI
- Has 15 hp more
- Has 70 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 182 km (113 mi) more estimated range
- Has 139 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Renault Megane IV Grandtour GT 1.6 Energy TCe
- Is 83 kg lighter
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























