Car comparison

Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TSIvsJaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Skoda Superb III Combi

2.0 TSI

220 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedWagon / estate2015-2018
VS

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260)

2.0d

240 hp1999 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedWagon / estate2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.7 s
  • Most powerful
    240 hp
    179 kW
  • Highest torque
    500 Nm
    369 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.8 L/100 km
    40.6 mpg US
    48.7 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,138 km
    707 mi
  • Best overall score
    68/100
  • Best performance score
    59/100
  • Best economy score
    91/100

Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TSI

  • Fastest top speed
    243 km/h
    151 mph
  • Lightest
    1,475 kg
    3,252 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    149 hp/t
    111 kW/t
    6.7 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    660 L
  • Best practicality score
    90/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TSIJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
Power
220hp164kW
240hp179kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
500Nm369lb-ft
Curb weight
1,475kg3,252lb
1,805kg3,979lb
Gross weight
2,130kg4,696lb
-
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
241 km/h
150 mph
To 99% top speed
72.1s99% target: 241 km/h / 149 mph
Calculated
71.8s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.1s
6.7s
0-200 km/h
25.3s
Calculated
25.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.8s
Calculated
6.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
15.0s
Calculated
14.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
149hp/t111kW/t68hp/1000 lb
Calculated
133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
237Nm/t159lb-ft/ton
Calculated
277Nm/t185lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,015km631mi
Calculated
1,138km707mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,999cc122cu in
Length
4,856mm191in
4,955mm195in
Width
1,864mm73in
1,987mm78in
Height
1,477mm58in
1,496mm59in
Wheelbase
2,841mm112in
2,960mm117in
Front track
1,586mm62in
1,605mm63in
Rear track
1,574mm62in
1,607mm63in
Ground clearance
149mm6in
116mm5in
Trunk volume
660L
565L
Max trunk volume
1,950L
1,700L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
66L
66L
CO2 emissions-
153g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TSIJaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0dPowerTorque
  • Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TSI4,500-6,200 rpm1,500-4,400 rpm6,450 rpm
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d4,000 rpm1,500 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TSIJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.8 s
6.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.1 s
6.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
25.3 s
25.0 s
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
241 km/h
150 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
6.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.0 s
9.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.7 s
12.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.0 s
14.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
159 km/h
99 mph
160 km/h
100 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TSI
220 hp
164 kW
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
240 hp
179 kW

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d has 20 hp more than Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TSI and Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d: 20 hp (15 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TSI
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
500 Nm
369 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TSI
1,475 kg
3,252 lb
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
1,805 kg
3,979 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TSI
243 km/h
151 mph
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
241 km/h
150 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TSI7.1 s
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d6.7 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d and Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TSI: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TSI
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d and Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TSI: 0.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TSI
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
133 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TSI
1,015 km
631 mi
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
1,138 km
707 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TSI
220 hp
164 kW
7.1 s
243 km/h
151 mph
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
240 hp
179 kW
6.7 s
241 km/h
150 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TSI
Power
220 hp
164 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
660 L
23.3 cu ft
Length
4,856 mm
191.2 in
Height
1,477 mm
58.1 in
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
565 L
20.0 cu ft
Length
4,955 mm
195.1 in
Height
1,496 mm
58.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TSI
Power
220 hp
164 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TSI
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
7.1 s
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
6.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TSI
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
133 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TSIJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
Power
220 hp
164 kW
240 hp
179 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.1 s
6.7 s
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
241 km/h
150 mph
Lightness
1,475 kg
3,252 lb
1,805 kg
3,979 lb
Fuel consumption
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
660 L
23.3 cu ft
Length
4,856 mm
191.2 in
Height
1,477 mm
58.1 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
565 L
20.0 cu ft
Length
4,955 mm
195.1 in
Height
1,496 mm
58.9 in
Range score
1,015 km
631 mi
1,138 km
707 mi
CO2 score
-
153 g/km
Trunk score
660 L
23.3 cu ft
565 L
20.0 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
133 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSkoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TSIJaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d
Consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.38 LC100 km10.15 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi18.31 LC100 mi16.33 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used975 L258 US gal214 UK gal870 L230 US gal191 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,706 LC/year1,523 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TSI

  • Is 330 kg lighter
  • Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 95 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d

  • Has 20 hp more
  • Has 150 Nm more
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 123 km (76 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TSI
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TSI
2.0d
2.0i
VS
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)2.0 TSI
2.0d
2.0d
VS
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF (X260)2.0d
2.0 TSI
3.0 TDI
VS
SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TSIvsAUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20163.0 TDI
2.0d
2.0i
VS
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
2.0 TSI
JCW 2.0
VS
SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TSIvsMiniClubman (F54)JCW 2.0
2.0d
5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8
2.0 TSI
3.0 TDI V6 clean diesel
VS
SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TSIvsAUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20143.0 TDI V6 clean diesel
2.0d
R-S 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
2.0 TSI
GT 1.6 Energy TCe
VS
SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TSIvsRenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy TCe
2.0 TSI
2.0
VS
SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TSIvsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0
Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TSI vs Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d - car comparison - FastVsFaster