Volvo V90
Car comparison
Volvo V90 2.0 T4vsRenault Megane IV Grandtour GT 1.6 Energy dCi
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Megane IV Grandtour
GT 1.6 Energy dCi
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Renault Megane IV Grandtour GT 1.6 Energy dCi
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lightest1,425 kg3,142 lb
- Best power-to-weight116 hp/t86 kW/t8.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions124 g/km
- Best estimated range1,000 km621 mi
- Best performance score45/100
- Best economy score94/100
Volvo V90 2.0 T4
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.9 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Largest trunk560 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoV902.0 T4 | RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy dCi |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 165hp123kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,785kg3,935lb | 1,425kg3,142lb |
| Gross weight | 2,300kg5,071lb | 1,995kg4,398lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | 214 km/h 133 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 85.4s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 78.9s99% target: 212 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.9s | 8.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 41.3s Calculated | 44.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.4s Calculated | 8.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.5s Calculated | 16.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 106hp/t79kW/t48hp/1000 lb Calculated | 116hp/t86kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 168Nm/t112lb-ft/ton Calculated | 267Nm/t178lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 809km503mi Calculated | 1,000km621mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,598cc98cu in |
| Length | 4,936mm194in | 4,626mm182in |
| Width | 1,879mm74in | 1,814mm71in |
| Height | 1,475mm58in | 1,457mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,941mm116in | 2,712mm107in |
| Front track | 1,628mm64in | 1,591mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,629mm64in | 1,586mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 560L | 521L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,504L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 47L |
| CO2 emissions | 158g/km | 124g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo V90 2.0 T4: Power / Torque
- Renault Megane IV Grandtour GT 1.6 Energy dCi: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 5,000 rpm | 1,600-4,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy dCi | 4,000 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoV902.0 T4 | RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy dCi |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.4 s | 8.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.9 s | 8.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 41.3 s | 44.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | 214 km/h 133 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.3 s | 7.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.9 s | 10.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.9 s | 13.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.5 s | 16.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 143 km/h 89 mph | 143 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
| RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy dCi | 165 hp 123 kW |
Volvo V90 2.0 T4 has 25 hp more than Renault Megane IV Grandtour GT 1.6 Energy dCi.
The biggest power difference is between Renault Megane IV Grandtour GT 1.6 Energy dCi and Volvo V90 2.0 T4: 25 hp (19 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy dCi | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 1,785 kg 3,935 lb |
| RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy dCi | 1,425 kg 3,142 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy dCi | 214 km/h 133 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 8.9 s |
| RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy dCi | 8.9 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy dCi | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Renault Megane IV Grandtour GT 1.6 Energy dCi and Volvo V90 2.0 T4: 2.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 106 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp |
| RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy dCi | 116 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 809 km 503 mi |
| RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy dCi | 1,000 km 621 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.9 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy dCi | 165 hp 123 kW | 8.9 s | 214 km/h 133 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 T4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy dCi |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 T4 |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy dCi |
| 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Renault Megane IV Grandtour GT 1.6 Energy dCi is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 8.9 s |
| RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy dCi | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 8.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 106 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy dCi | 116 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoV902.0 T4 | RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy dCi | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 165 hp 123 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.9 s | 8.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | 214 km/h 133 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,785 kg 3,935 lb | 1,425 kg 3,142 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 809 km 503 mi | 1,000 km 621 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 158 g/km | 124 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 560 L 19.8 cu ft | 521 L 18.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 106 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp | 116 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo V90 2.0 T4 | Renault Megane IV Grandtour GT 1.6 Energy dCi |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK | 4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.90 LC100 km | 8.23 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi | 13.24 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal | 705 L186 US gal155 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,785 LC/year | 1,234 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo V90 2.0 T4
- Has 25 hp more
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 39 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Renault Megane IV Grandtour GT 1.6 Energy dCi
- Has 80 Nm more
- Is 360 kg lighter
- Uses 2.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 191 km (119 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 34 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























