Renault Megane III
Car comparison
Renault Megane III GT 2.0 TCevsToyota Auris I 2.2 D-4D
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonToyota Auris I
2.2 D-4D
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Renault Megane III GT 2.0 TCe
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.8 s
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph
- Most powerful180 hp134 kW
- Lightest1,320 kg2,910 lb
- Best power-to-weight136 hp/t102 kW/t7.3 kg/hp
- Largest trunk405 L
- Best overall score57/100
- Best practicality score75/100
Toyota Auris I 2.2 D-4D
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range887 km551 mi
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score90/100
Specification comparison
| Model | RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe | ToyotaAuris I2.2 D-4D |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 180hp134kW | 177hp132kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,320kg2,910lb | 1,435kg3,164lb |
| Gross weight | 1,830kg4,034lb | 1,920kg4,233lb |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 88.4s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 85.1s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 8.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 34.3s Calculated | 39.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 7.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 136hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated | 123hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 227Nm/t152lb-ft/ton Calculated | 279Nm/t187lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 779km484mi Calculated | 887km551mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 2,231cc136cu in |
| Length | 4,295mm169in | 4,220mm166in |
| Width | 1,808mm71in | 1,760mm69in |
| Height | 1,471mm58in | 1,515mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,641mm104in | 2,600mm102in |
| Front track | 1,546mm61in | 1,524mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,547mm61in | 1,522mm60in |
| Ground clearance | 120mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 405L | 354L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,162L | 761L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 178g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Renault Megane III GT 2.0 TCe: Power / Torque
- Toyota Auris I 2.2 D-4D: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe | 5,500 rpm | 2,250 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| ToyotaAuris I2.2 D-4D | 3,600 rpm | 2,000-2,600 rpm | 3,850 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe | ToyotaAuris I2.2 D-4D |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 7.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 8.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 34.3 s | 39.9 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 149 km/h 92 mph | 146 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe | 180 hp 134 kW |
| ToyotaAuris I2.2 D-4D | 177 hp 132 kW |
Renault Megane III GT 2.0 TCe has 3 hp more than Toyota Auris I 2.2 D-4D.
The biggest power difference is between Toyota Auris I 2.2 D-4D and Renault Megane III GT 2.0 TCe: 3 hp (2 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| ToyotaAuris I2.2 D-4D | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb |
| ToyotaAuris I2.2 D-4D | 1,435 kg 3,164 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| ToyotaAuris I2.2 D-4D | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe | 7.8 s |
| ToyotaAuris I2.2 D-4D | 8.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Renault Megane III GT 2.0 TCe and Toyota Auris I 2.2 D-4D: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| ToyotaAuris I2.2 D-4D | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Toyota Auris I 2.2 D-4D and Renault Megane III GT 2.0 TCe: 1.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe | 136 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
| ToyotaAuris I2.2 D-4D | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe | 779 km 484 mi |
| ToyotaAuris I2.2 D-4D | 887 km 551 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe | 180 hp 134 kW | 7.8 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| ToyotaAuris I2.2 D-4D | 177 hp 132 kW | 8.1 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| ToyotaAuris I2.2 D-4D |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| ToyotaAuris I2.2 D-4D |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Toyota Auris I 2.2 D-4D is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
| ToyotaAuris I2.2 D-4D | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 8.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe | 136 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| ToyotaAuris I2.2 D-4D | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe | ToyotaAuris I2.2 D-4D | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 180 hp 134 kW | 177 hp 132 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 8.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb | 1,435 kg 3,164 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 779 km 484 mi | 887 km 551 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 178 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 405 L 14.3 cu ft | 354 L 12.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 136 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Renault Megane III GT 2.0 TCe | Toyota Auris I 2.2 D-4D |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.48 LC100 km | 10.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,021 LC/year | 1,628 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Renault Megane III GT 2.0 TCe
- Has 3 hp more
- Is 115 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 51 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Toyota Auris I 2.2 D-4D
- Has 100 Nm more
- Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 108 km (67 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























