Toyota Auris I
Car comparison
Toyota Auris I 2.2 D-4DvsRenault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Laguna III
2.0 dCi FAP
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Toyota Auris I 2.2 D-4D
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.1 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,435 kg3,164 lb
- Best power-to-weight123 hp/t92 kW/t8.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
- Best overall score57/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score90/100
Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP
- Most powerful178 hp133 kW
- Best estimated range1,015 km631 mi
- Largest trunk450 L
- Best practicality score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | ToyotaAuris I2.2 D-4D | RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 177hp132kW | 178hp133kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,435kg3,164lb | 1,539kg3,393lb |
| Gross weight | 1,920kg4,233lb | 2,089kg4,605lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 85.1s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 92.7s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.1s | 8.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 39.9s Calculated | 44.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.7s Calculated | 8.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.9s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 123hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated | 116hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 279Nm/t187lb-ft/ton Calculated | 260Nm/t174lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 887km551mi Calculated | 1,015km631mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,231cc136cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,220mm166in | 4,695mm185in |
| Width | 1,760mm69in | 1,811mm71in |
| Height | 1,515mm60in | 1,445mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,600mm102in | 2,756mm109in |
| Front track | 1,524mm60in | 1,557mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,522mm60in | 1,512mm60in |
| Ground clearance | - | 120mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 354L | 450L |
| Max trunk volume | 761L | 1,377L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 66L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Toyota Auris I 2.2 D-4D: Power / Torque
- Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ToyotaAuris I2.2 D-4D | 3,600 rpm | 2,000-2,600 rpm | 3,850 rpm |
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | 3,750 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 4,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | ToyotaAuris I2.2 D-4D | RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.7 s | 8.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.1 s | 8.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 39.9 s | 44.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.4 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.9 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 146 km/h 90 mph | 142 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaAuris I2.2 D-4D | 177 hp 132 kW |
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | 178 hp 133 kW |
Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP has 1 hp more than Toyota Auris I 2.2 D-4D.
The biggest power difference is between Toyota Auris I 2.2 D-4D and Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP: 1 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaAuris I2.2 D-4D | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaAuris I2.2 D-4D | 1,435 kg 3,164 lb |
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | 1,539 kg 3,393 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaAuris I2.2 D-4D | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | 218 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaAuris I2.2 D-4D | 8.1 s |
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | 8.5 s |
Although Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP has more power, Toyota Auris I 2.2 D-4D is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Toyota Auris I 2.2 D-4D and Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaAuris I2.2 D-4D | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaAuris I2.2 D-4D | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | 116 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaAuris I2.2 D-4D | 887 km 551 mi |
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | 1,015 km 631 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ToyotaAuris I2.2 D-4D | 177 hp 132 kW | 8.1 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | 178 hp 133 kW | 8.5 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ToyotaAuris I2.2 D-4D |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ToyotaAuris I2.2 D-4D |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP |
| 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Toyota Auris I 2.2 D-4D is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| ToyotaAuris I2.2 D-4D | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 8.1 s |
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| ToyotaAuris I2.2 D-4D | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | 116 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | ToyotaAuris I2.2 D-4D | RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 177 hp 132 kW | 178 hp 133 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.1 s | 8.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,435 kg 3,164 lb | 1,539 kg 3,393 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 887 km 551 mi | 1,015 km 631 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 354 L 12.5 cu ft | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 116 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Toyota Auris I 2.2 D-4D | Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.85 LC100 km | 11.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,628 LC/year | 1,706 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Toyota Auris I 2.2 D-4D
- Is 104 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP
- Has 1 hp more
- Has 128 km (80 mi) more estimated range
- Has 96 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























