Renault Vel Satis
Car comparison
Renault Vel Satis 3.5 V6vsRenault Megane III GT 2.0 TCe
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Megane III
GT 2.0 TCe
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Renault Vel Satis 3.5 V6
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Most powerful241 hp180 kW
- Highest torque330 Nm243 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight140 hp/t104 kW/t7.1 kg/hp
- Largest trunk460 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best practicality score79/100
Renault Megane III GT 2.0 TCe
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.8 s
- Lightest1,320 kg2,910 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range779 km484 mi
- Best economy score86/100
Specification comparison
| Model | RenaultVel Satis3.5 V6 | RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 241hp180kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 330Nm243lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,720kg3,792lb | 1,320kg2,910lb |
| Gross weight | 2,270kg5,004lb | 1,830kg4,034lb |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 104.6s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 88.4s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.3s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 36.4s Calculated | 34.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.9s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.8L/100 km14mpg US16.8mpg UK | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.0s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 140hp/t104kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated | 136hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 192Nm/t128lb-ft/ton Calculated | 227Nm/t152lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 696km432mi Calculated | 779km484mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,498cc213cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,860mm191in | 4,295mm169in |
| Width | 1,860mm73in | 1,808mm71in |
| Height | 1,575mm62in | 1,471mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,840mm112in | 2,641mm104in |
| Front track | 1,575mm62in | 1,546mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,555mm61in | 1,547mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 120mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 460L | 405L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,162L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 178g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Renault Vel Satis 3.5 V6: Power / Torque
- Renault Megane III GT 2.0 TCe: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultVel Satis3.5 V6 | 6,000 rpm | 3,600 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe | 5,500 rpm | 2,250 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | RenaultVel Satis3.5 V6 | RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.9 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.3 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 36.4 s | 34.3 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.0 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 145 km/h 90 mph | 149 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultVel Satis3.5 V6 | 241 hp 180 kW |
| RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe | 180 hp 134 kW |
Renault Vel Satis 3.5 V6 has 61 hp more than Renault Megane III GT 2.0 TCe.
The biggest power difference is between Renault Megane III GT 2.0 TCe and Renault Vel Satis 3.5 V6: 61 hp (45 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultVel Satis3.5 V6 | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
| RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultVel Satis3.5 V6 | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb |
| RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultVel Satis3.5 V6 | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultVel Satis3.5 V6 | 8.3 s |
| RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe | 7.8 s |
Although Renault Vel Satis 3.5 V6 has more power, Renault Megane III GT 2.0 TCe is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Renault Megane III GT 2.0 TCe and Renault Vel Satis 3.5 V6: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultVel Satis3.5 V6 | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
| RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Renault Megane III GT 2.0 TCe and Renault Vel Satis 3.5 V6: 3.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultVel Satis3.5 V6 | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
| RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe | 136 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultVel Satis3.5 V6 | 696 km 432 mi |
| RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe | 779 km 484 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultVel Satis3.5 V6 | 241 hp 180 kW | 8.3 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe | 180 hp 134 kW | 7.8 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultVel Satis3.5 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultVel Satis3.5 V6 |
| 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Renault Megane III GT 2.0 TCe is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultVel Satis3.5 V6 | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
| RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultVel Satis3.5 V6 | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
| RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe | 136 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | RenaultVel Satis3.5 V6 | RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 241 hp 180 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.3 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 696 km 432 mi | 779 km 484 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 178 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | 405 L 14.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 136 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Renault Vel Satis 3.5 V6 | Renault Megane III GT 2.0 TCe |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.13 LC100 km | 13.48 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.39 LC100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,725 L456 US gal379 UK gal | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,019 LC/year | 2,021 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Renault Vel Satis 3.5 V6
- Has 61 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 55 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Renault Megane III GT 2.0 TCe
- Is 400 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 3.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 84 km (52 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























