Renault Megane II
Car comparison
Renault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16VvsRenault Vel Satis 3.5 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Vel Satis
3.5 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Renault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Fastest top speed236 km/h147 mph
- Lightest1,375 kg3,031 lb
- Best power-to-weight163 hp/t121 kW/t6.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.0 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score56/100
- Best economy score83/100
Renault Vel Satis 3.5 V6
- Most powerful241 hp180 kW
- Highest torque330 Nm243 lb-ft
- Best estimated range696 km432 mi
- Largest trunk460 L
- Best practicality score79/100
Specification comparison
| Model | RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | RenaultVel Satis3.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 224hp167kW | 241hp180kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 330Nm243lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,375kg3,031lb | 1,720kg3,792lb |
| Gross weight | 1,820kg4,012lb | 2,270kg5,004lb |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 76.7s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 104.6s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 8.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.1s Calculated | 36.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 7.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK | 16.8L/100 km14mpg US16.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 163hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated | 140hp/t104kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 218Nm/t146lb-ft/ton Calculated | 192Nm/t128lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 682km424mi Calculated | 696km432mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 3,498cc213cu in |
| Length | 4,228mm166in | 4,860mm191in |
| Width | 2,026mm80in | 1,860mm73in |
| Height | 1,436mm57in | 1,575mm62in |
| Wheelbase | 2,617mm103in | 2,840mm112in |
| Front track | 1,517mm60in | 1,575mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,521mm60in | 1,555mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 330L | 460L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,190L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 80L |
| CO2 emissions | 209g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Renault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16V: Power / Torque
- Renault Vel Satis 3.5 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 5,500 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| RenaultVel Satis3.5 V6 | 6,000 rpm | 3,600 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | RenaultVel Satis3.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 7.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 8.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.1 s | 36.4 s |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 145 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 224 hp 167 kW |
| RenaultVel Satis3.5 V6 | 241 hp 180 kW |
Renault Vel Satis 3.5 V6 has 17 hp more than Renault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16V.
The biggest power difference is between Renault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16V and Renault Vel Satis 3.5 V6: 17 hp (13 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| RenaultVel Satis3.5 V6 | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 1,375 kg 3,031 lb |
| RenaultVel Satis3.5 V6 | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| RenaultVel Satis3.5 V6 | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 6.5 s |
| RenaultVel Satis3.5 V6 | 8.3 s |
Although Renault Vel Satis 3.5 V6 has more power, Renault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Renault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16V and Renault Vel Satis 3.5 V6: 1.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK |
| RenaultVel Satis3.5 V6 | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Renault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16V and Renault Vel Satis 3.5 V6: 2.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
| RenaultVel Satis3.5 V6 | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 682 km 424 mi |
| RenaultVel Satis3.5 V6 | 696 km 432 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 224 hp 167 kW | 6.5 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| RenaultVel Satis3.5 V6 | 241 hp 180 kW | 8.3 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultVel Satis3.5 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V |
| 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| RenaultVel Satis3.5 V6 |
| 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Renault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
| RenaultVel Satis3.5 V6 | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK |
| RenaultVel Satis3.5 V6 | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | RenaultVel Satis3.5 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 224 hp 167 kW | 241 hp 180 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 8.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,375 kg 3,031 lb | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 682 km 424 mi | 696 km 432 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 209 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 330 L 11.7 cu ft | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Renault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16V | Renault Vel Satis 3.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK | 11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.40 LC100 km | 20.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 24.78 LC100 mi | 32.39 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,320 L349 US gal290 UK gal | 1,725 L456 US gal379 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,310 LC/year | 3,019 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Renault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
- Is 345 kg lighter
- Is 1.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 23 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Renault Vel Satis 3.5 V6
- Has 17 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Has 14 km (9 mi) more estimated range
- Has 130 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























