Renault Megane III Grandtour
Car comparison
Renault Megane III Grandtour GT 2.0 TCevsSeat Exeo ST 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSeat Exeo ST
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Renault Megane III Grandtour GT 2.0 TCe
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.0 s
- Fastest top speed225 km/h140 mph
- Most powerful180 hp134 kW
- Lightest1,391 kg3,067 lb
- Best power-to-weight129 hp/t96 kW/t7.7 kg/hp
- Largest trunk524 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score48/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TDI
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.1 L/100 km29.0 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,186 km737 mi
- Best economy score91/100
Specification comparison
| Model | RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe | SeatExeo ST2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 180hp134kW | 170hp127kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,391kg3,067lb | 1,515kg3,340lb |
| Gross weight | 1,884kg4,154lb | 2,075kg4,575lb |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 73.9s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 80.6s99% target: 222 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.0s | 8.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 33.2s Calculated | 36.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.6s Calculated | 8.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.8s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 129hp/t96kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated | 112hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 216Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated | 231Nm/t155lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 779km484mi Calculated | 1,186km737mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,559mm179in | 4,670mm184in |
| Width | 1,766mm70in | 1,772mm70in |
| Height | 1,461mm58in | 1,430mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,703mm106in | 2,642mm104in |
| Front track | 1,546mm61in | 1,522mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,547mm61in | 1,523mm60in |
| Ground clearance | 120mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 524L | 442L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,595L | 1,354L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 178g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Renault Megane III Grandtour GT 2.0 TCe: Power / Torque
- Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe | 5,500 rpm | 2,250 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TDI | 4,200 rpm | 1,800 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe | SeatExeo ST2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.6 s | 8.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.0 s | 8.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 33.2 s | 36.6 s |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.4 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.8 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 146 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe | 180 hp 134 kW |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TDI | 170 hp 127 kW |
Renault Megane III Grandtour GT 2.0 TCe has 10 hp more than Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TDI and Renault Megane III Grandtour GT 2.0 TCe: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TDI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe | 1,391 kg 3,067 lb |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TDI | 1,515 kg 3,340 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TDI | 224 km/h 139 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe | 8.0 s |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TDI | 8.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Renault Megane III Grandtour GT 2.0 TCe and Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TDI: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TDI | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TDI and Renault Megane III Grandtour GT 2.0 TCe: 1.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TDI | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe | 779 km 484 mi |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TDI | 1,186 km 737 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe | 180 hp 134 kW | 8.0 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TDI | 170 hp 127 kW | 8.6 s | 224 km/h 139 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TDI |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Renault Megane III Grandtour GT 2.0 TCe is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TDI | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TDI | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe | SeatExeo ST2.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 180 hp 134 kW | 170 hp 127 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.0 s | 8.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 224 km/h 139 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,391 kg 3,067 lb | 1,515 kg 3,340 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 779 km 484 mi | 1,186 km 737 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 178 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 524 L 18.5 cu ft | 442 L 15.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Renault Megane III Grandtour GT 2.0 TCe | Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.48 LC100 km | 10.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,021 LC/year | 1,549 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Renault Megane III Grandtour GT 2.0 TCe
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 124 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 82 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TDI
- Has 50 Nm more
- Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 407 km (253 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























