Car comparison

Renault Megane III Coupe RS 2.0 16VvsVolvo C30 · Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Renault Megane III Coupe

RS 2.0 16V

250 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedCoupe2009-2012
VS

Volvo C30 · Facelift 2010

2.5 T5 20V

230 hp2521 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedCoupe2010-2013

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Renault Megane III Coupe RS 2.0 16V

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.1 s
  • Fastest top speed
    245 km/h
    152 mph
  • Most powerful
    250 hp
    186 kW
  • Highest torque
    340 Nm
    251 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,387 kg
    3,058 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    180 hp/t
    134 kW/t
    5.5 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.4 L/100 km
    28.0 mpg US
    33.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    11.5 L/100 km
    20.5 mpg US
    24.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    190 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    714 km
    444 mi
  • Largest trunk
    377 L
  • Best overall score
    59/100
  • Best performance score
    59/100
  • Best economy score
    84/100
  • Best practicality score
    58/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelRenaultMegane III CoupeRS 2.0 16VVolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V
Power
250hp186kW
230hp172kW
Torque
340Nm251lb-ft
320Nm236lb-ft
Curb weight
1,387kg3,058lb
1,519kg3,349lb
Gross weight
1,835kg4,045lb
1,860kg4,101lb
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
235 km/h
146 mph
To 99% top speed
81.0s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph
Calculated
87.4s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.1s
7.1s
0-200 km/h
24.6s
Calculated
30.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.8s
Calculated
6.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK
13.5L/100 km17.4mpg US20.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.2s
Calculated
15.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
180hp/t134kW/t82hp/1000 lb
Calculated
151hp/t113kW/t69hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
245Nm/t164lb-ft/ton
Calculated
211Nm/t141lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
714km444mi
Calculated
689km428mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
2,521cc154cu in
Length
4,299mm169in
4,266mm168in
Width
1,848mm73in
1,782mm70in
Height
1,435mm56in
1,447mm57in
Wheelbase
2,636mm104in
2,640mm104in
Front track
1,588mm63in
1,535mm60in
Rear track
1,545mm61in
1,531mm60in
Ground clearance
120mm5in
-
Trunk volume
377L
278L
Max trunk volume
1,024L
921L
Doors
3
3
Seats
5
4
Fuel tank
60L
62L
CO2 emissions
190g/km
211g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Renault Megane III Coupe RS 2.0 16VVolvo C30 Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20VPowerTorque
  • Renault Megane III Coupe RS 2.0 16V: Power / Torque
  • Volvo C30 Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
RenaultMegane III CoupeRS 2.0 16V5,500 rpm3,000 rpm5,750 rpm
VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V5,000 rpm1,500-5,000 rpm5,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricRenaultMegane III CoupeRS 2.0 16VVolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.8 s
6.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.1 s
7.1 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
24.6 s
30.7 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
235 km/h
146 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.1 s
6.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.3 s
9.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.0 s
12.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.2 s
15.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
161 km/h
100 mph
152 km/h
95 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultMegane III CoupeRS 2.0 16V
250 hp
186 kW
VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V
230 hp
172 kW

Renault Megane III Coupe RS 2.0 16V has 20 hp more than Volvo C30 Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V.

The biggest power difference is between Volvo C30 Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V and Renault Megane III Coupe RS 2.0 16V: 20 hp (15 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultMegane III CoupeRS 2.0 16V
340 Nm
251 lb-ft
VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V
320 Nm
236 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultMegane III CoupeRS 2.0 16V
1,387 kg
3,058 lb
VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V
1,519 kg
3,349 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultMegane III CoupeRS 2.0 16V
245 km/h
152 mph
VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V
235 km/h
146 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultMegane III CoupeRS 2.0 16V6.1 s
VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V7.1 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Renault Megane III Coupe RS 2.0 16V and Volvo C30 Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V: 1.0 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultMegane III CoupeRS 2.0 16V
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V
9.0 L/100 km
26.1 mpg US
31.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Renault Megane III Coupe RS 2.0 16V and Volvo C30 Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V: 0.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultMegane III CoupeRS 2.0 16V
180 hp/t
134 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp
VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V
151 hp/t
113 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultMegane III CoupeRS 2.0 16V
714 km
444 mi
VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V
689 km
428 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
RenaultMegane III CoupeRS 2.0 16V
250 hp
186 kW
6.1 s
245 km/h
152 mph
VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V
230 hp
172 kW
7.1 s
235 km/h
146 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
RenaultMegane III CoupeRS 2.0 16V
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.1 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
5 seats
Trunk
377 L
13.3 cu ft
Length
4,299 mm
169.3 in
Height
1,435 mm
56.5 in
VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V
Power
230 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
278 L
9.8 cu ft
Length
4,266 mm
168.0 in
Height
1,447 mm
57.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
RenaultMegane III CoupeRS 2.0 16V
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.1 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V
Power
230 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
9.0 L/100 km
26.1 mpg US
31.4 mpg UK

Renault Megane III Coupe RS 2.0 16V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
RenaultMegane III CoupeRS 2.0 16V
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
6.1 s
VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V
9.0 L/100 km
26.1 mpg US
31.4 mpg UK
7.1 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
RenaultMegane III CoupeRS 2.0 16V
180 hp/t
134 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V
151 hp/t
113 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
9.0 L/100 km
26.1 mpg US
31.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleRenaultMegane III CoupeRS 2.0 16VVolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V
Power
250 hp
186 kW
230 hp
172 kW
Torque
340 Nm
251 lb-ft
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.1 s
7.1 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
235 km/h
146 mph
Lightness
1,387 kg
3,058 lb
1,519 kg
3,349 lb
Fuel consumption
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
9.0 L/100 km
26.1 mpg US
31.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
3 doors
5 seats
Trunk
377 L
13.3 cu ft
Length
4,299 mm
169.3 in
Height
1,435 mm
56.5 in
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
278 L
9.8 cu ft
Length
4,266 mm
168.0 in
Height
1,447 mm
57.0 in
Range score
714 km
444 mi
689 km
428 mi
CO2 score
190 g/km
211 g/km
Trunk score
377 L
13.3 cu ft
278 L
9.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
180 hp/t
134 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp
151 hp/t
113 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleRenault Megane III Coupe RS 2.0 16VVolvo C30 Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V
Consumption8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK9 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.70 LC100 km15.75 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi23.66 LC100 mi25.35 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal1,350 L357 US gal297 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,205 LC/year2,363 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Renault Megane III Coupe RS 2.0 16V

  • Has 20 hp more
  • Has 20 Nm more
  • Is 132 kg lighter
  • Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 29 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 25 km (16 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 99 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 21 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Volvo C30 Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V

No measurable advantages in the available data.

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Renault Megane III Coupe RS 2.0 16V
Volvo C30 2.5 T5 20V
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

RS 2.0 16V
RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
VS
RenaultMegane III CoupeRS 2.0 16VvsRenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
2.5 T5 20V
2.5 i 20V T5
VS
VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20VvsVolvoC302.5 i 20V T5
RS 2.0 16V
RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
VS
RenaultMegane III CoupeRS 2.0 16VvsRenaultMegane II CoupeRS 2.0 Turbo 16V
2.5 T5 20V
2.0 TSI
VS
VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20VvsVolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI
RS 2.0 16V
GT 2.0 TCe
VS
RenaultMegane III CoupeRS 2.0 16VvsRenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe
2.5 T5 20V
3.0 dCi V6 FAP
VS
VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20VvsRenaultLaguna Coupe3.0 dCi V6 FAP
RS 2.0 16V
RS 2.0 16V
VS
RenaultMegane III CoupeRS 2.0 16VvsRenaultMegane II (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V
2.5 T5 20V
1.6 THP
VS
VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20VvsPeugeotRCZ1.6 THP
RS 2.0 16V
GT 2.0 TCe
VS
RenaultMegane III CoupeRS 2.0 16VvsRenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe
2.5 T5 20V
125i
VS
VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20VvsBMW1 Series Coupe (E82)125i
RS 2.0 16V
RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
VS
RenaultMegane III CoupeRS 2.0 16VvsRenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V
2.5 T5 20V
2.0 TFSI
VS
VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20VvsAUDITT Coupe (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI
Renault Megane III Coupe RS 2.0 16V vs Volvo C30 · Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V - car comparison - FastVsFaster