Renault Megane III CC
Car comparison
Renault Megane III CC GT 2.0 TCevsRenault Megane IV 1.3 TCe
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Megane IV
1.3 TCe
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Renault Megane IV 1.3 TCe
- Lightest1,254 kg2,765 lb
- Best power-to-weight128 hp/t95 kW/t7.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions125 g/km
- Best estimated range909 km565 mi
- Largest trunk407 L
- Best overall score53/100
- Best economy score92/100
- Best practicality score75/100
Renault Megane III CC GT 2.0 TCe
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.5 s
- Fastest top speed225 km/h140 mph
- Most powerful180 hp134 kW
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Best performance score46/100
Specification comparison
| Model | RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe | RenaultMegane IV1.3 TCe |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 180hp134kW | 160hp119kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 260Nm192lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,540kg3,395lb | 1,254kg2,765lb |
| Gross weight | 1,926kg4,246lb | 1,814kg3,999lb |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 109.4s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 84.6s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.5s | 9.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 43.7s Calculated | 65.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.0s Calculated | 8.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.1s Calculated | 16.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated | 128hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 195Nm/t130lb-ft/ton Calculated | 207Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 741km460mi Calculated | 909km565mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,332cc81cu in |
| Length | 4,485mm177in | 4,359mm172in |
| Width | 1,811mm71in | 1,814mm71in |
| Height | 1,434mm56in | 1,447mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,609mm103in | 2,669mm105in |
| Front track | 1,546mm61in | 1,591mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,547mm61in | 1,586mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 120mm5in | 145mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 211L | 407L |
| Max trunk volume | 417L | 1,247L |
| Doors | 2 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | 188g/km | 125g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Renault Megane III CC GT 2.0 TCe: Power / Torque
- Renault Megane IV 1.3 TCe: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe | 5,500 rpm | 2,250 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| RenaultMegane IV1.3 TCe | 5,500 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe | RenaultMegane IV1.3 TCe |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.0 s | 8.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.5 s | 9.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 43.7 s | 65.9 s |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 13.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.1 s | 16.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 141 km/h 88 mph | 139 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe | 180 hp 134 kW |
| RenaultMegane IV1.3 TCe | 160 hp 119 kW |
Renault Megane III CC GT 2.0 TCe has 20 hp more than Renault Megane IV 1.3 TCe.
The biggest power difference is between Renault Megane IV 1.3 TCe and Renault Megane III CC GT 2.0 TCe: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| RenaultMegane IV1.3 TCe | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb |
| RenaultMegane IV1.3 TCe | 1,254 kg 2,765 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| RenaultMegane IV1.3 TCe | 205 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe | 8.5 s |
| RenaultMegane IV1.3 TCe | 9.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Renault Megane III CC GT 2.0 TCe and Renault Megane IV 1.3 TCe: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
| RenaultMegane IV1.3 TCe | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Renault Megane IV 1.3 TCe and Renault Megane III CC GT 2.0 TCe: 2.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp |
| RenaultMegane IV1.3 TCe | 128 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe | 741 km 460 mi |
| RenaultMegane IV1.3 TCe | 909 km 565 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe | 180 hp 134 kW | 8.5 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| RenaultMegane IV1.3 TCe | 160 hp 119 kW | 9.0 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultMegane IV1.3 TCe |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe |
| 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| RenaultMegane IV1.3 TCe |
| 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Renault Megane III CC GT 2.0 TCe is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
| RenaultMegane IV1.3 TCe | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 9.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
| RenaultMegane IV1.3 TCe | 128 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe | RenaultMegane IV1.3 TCe | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 180 hp 134 kW | 160 hp 119 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.5 s | 9.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb | 1,254 kg 2,765 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 741 km 460 mi | 909 km 565 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 188 g/km | 125 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 211 L 7.5 cu ft | 407 L 14.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 128 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Renault Megane III CC GT 2.0 TCe | Renault Megane IV 1.3 TCe |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.17 LC100 km | 9.63 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.81 LC100 mi | 15.49 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal | 825 L218 US gal181 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,126 LC/year | 1,444 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Renault Megane III CC GT 2.0 TCe
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 40 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Renault Megane IV 1.3 TCe
- Is 286 kg lighter
- Uses 2.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 168 km (105 mi) more estimated range
- Has 196 L more trunk volume
- Emits 63 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























