Renault Laguna III
Car comparison
Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAPvsSeat Toledo III (5P) 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSeat Toledo III (5P)
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Seat Toledo III (5P) 2.0 TDI
- Lightest1,454 kg3,206 lb
- Best power-to-weight117 hp/t87 kW/t8.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.0 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
- Largest trunk500 L
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score79/100
Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.5 s
- Fastest top speed218 km/h135 mph
- Most powerful178 hp133 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Best estimated range1,015 km631 mi
- Best overall score57/100
- Best performance score47/100
Specification comparison
| Model | RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | SeatToledo III (5P)2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 178hp133kW | 170hp127kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,539kg3,393lb | 1,454kg3,206lb |
| Gross weight | 2,089kg4,605lb | 2,054kg4,528lb |
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 211 km/h 131 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 93.4s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated | 90.8s99% target: 209 km/h / 130 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.5s | 8.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 45.0s Calculated | 53.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.0s Calculated | 8.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.2s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 116hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated | 117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 260Nm/t174lb-ft/ton Calculated | 241Nm/t161lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,015km631mi Calculated | 887km551mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,695mm185in | 4,458mm176in |
| Width | 1,811mm71in | 1,768mm70in |
| Height | 1,445mm57in | 1,568mm62in |
| Wheelbase | 2,756mm109in | 2,578mm101in |
| Front track | 1,557mm61in | 1,534mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,512mm60in | 1,523mm60in |
| Ground clearance | 120mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 450L | 500L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,377L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 55L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP: Power / Torque
- Seat Toledo III (5P) 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | 3,750 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 4,000 rpm |
| SeatToledo III (5P)2.0 TDI | 4,200 rpm | 1,800 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | SeatToledo III (5P)2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.0 s | 8.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.5 s | 8.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 45.0 s | 53.4 s |
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 211 km/h 131 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.2 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 142 km/h 88 mph | 140 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | 178 hp 133 kW |
| SeatToledo III (5P)2.0 TDI | 170 hp 127 kW |
Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP has 8 hp more than Seat Toledo III (5P) 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Seat Toledo III (5P) 2.0 TDI and Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP: 8 hp (6 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| SeatToledo III (5P)2.0 TDI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | 1,539 kg 3,393 lb |
| SeatToledo III (5P)2.0 TDI | 1,454 kg 3,206 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| SeatToledo III (5P)2.0 TDI | 211 km/h 131 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | 8.5 s |
| SeatToledo III (5P)2.0 TDI | 8.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP and Seat Toledo III (5P) 2.0 TDI: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
| SeatToledo III (5P)2.0 TDI | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | 116 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp |
| SeatToledo III (5P)2.0 TDI | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | 1,015 km 631 mi |
| SeatToledo III (5P)2.0 TDI | 887 km 551 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | 178 hp 133 kW | 8.5 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| SeatToledo III (5P)2.0 TDI | 170 hp 127 kW | 8.6 s | 211 km/h 131 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SeatToledo III (5P)2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP |
| 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| SeatToledo III (5P)2.0 TDI |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
| SeatToledo III (5P)2.0 TDI | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | 116 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
| SeatToledo III (5P)2.0 TDI | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | SeatToledo III (5P)2.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 178 hp 133 kW | 170 hp 127 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.5 s | 8.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 211 km/h 131 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,539 kg 3,393 lb | 1,454 kg 3,206 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,015 km 631 mi | 887 km 551 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 116 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP | Seat Toledo III (5P) 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.38 LC100 km | 10.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,706 LC/year | 1,628 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP
- Has 8 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 128 km (80 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Seat Toledo III (5P) 2.0 TDI
- Is 85 kg lighter
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 50 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























