Seat Ibiza III · Facelift 2006
Car comparison
Seat Ibiza III · Facelift 2006 Cupra 1.8 TvsSeat Toledo III (5P) 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSeat Toledo III (5P)
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Seat Toledo III (5P) 2.0 TDI
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.0 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range887 km551 mi
- Largest trunk500 L
- Best overall score56/100
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score79/100
Seat Ibiza III Facelift 2006 Cupra 1.8 T
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Fastest top speed229 km/h142 mph
- Most powerful180 hp134 kW
- Lightest1,177 kg2,595 lb
- Best power-to-weight153 hp/t114 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
- Best performance score50/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SeatIbiza IIIFacelift 2006Cupra 1.8 T | SeatToledo III (5P)2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 180hp134kW | 170hp127kW |
| Torque | 245Nm181lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,177kg2,595lb | 1,454kg3,206lb |
| Gross weight | 1,649kg3,635lb | 2,054kg4,528lb |
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 211 km/h 131 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 76.6s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 90.8s99% target: 209 km/h / 130 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 8.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.0s Calculated | 53.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 8.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated | 117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated | 241Nm/t161lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 563km350mi Calculated | 887km551mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,781cc109cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 3,992mm157in | 4,458mm176in |
| Width | 1,698mm67in | 1,768mm70in |
| Height | 1,441mm57in | 1,568mm62in |
| Wheelbase | 2,460mm97in | 2,578mm101in |
| Front track | 1,423mm56in | 1,534mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,412mm56in | 1,523mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 267L | 500L |
| Max trunk volume | 960L | - |
| Doors | 3 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 45L | 55L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Seat Ibiza III Facelift 2006 Cupra 1.8 T: Power / Torque
- Seat Toledo III (5P) 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatIbiza IIIFacelift 2006Cupra 1.8 T | 5,800 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 6,050 rpm |
| SeatToledo III (5P)2.0 TDI | 4,200 rpm | 1,800 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SeatIbiza IIIFacelift 2006Cupra 1.8 T | SeatToledo III (5P)2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 8.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 8.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.0 s | 53.4 s |
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 211 km/h 131 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 153 km/h 95 mph | 140 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatIbiza IIIFacelift 2006Cupra 1.8 T | 180 hp 134 kW |
| SeatToledo III (5P)2.0 TDI | 170 hp 127 kW |
Seat Ibiza III Facelift 2006 Cupra 1.8 T has 10 hp more than Seat Toledo III (5P) 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Seat Toledo III (5P) 2.0 TDI and Seat Ibiza III Facelift 2006 Cupra 1.8 T: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatIbiza IIIFacelift 2006Cupra 1.8 T | 245 Nm 181 lb-ft |
| SeatToledo III (5P)2.0 TDI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatIbiza IIIFacelift 2006Cupra 1.8 T | 1,177 kg 2,595 lb |
| SeatToledo III (5P)2.0 TDI | 1,454 kg 3,206 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatIbiza IIIFacelift 2006Cupra 1.8 T | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| SeatToledo III (5P)2.0 TDI | 211 km/h 131 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatIbiza IIIFacelift 2006Cupra 1.8 T | 7.3 s |
| SeatToledo III (5P)2.0 TDI | 8.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Ibiza III Facelift 2006 Cupra 1.8 T and Seat Toledo III (5P) 2.0 TDI: 1.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatIbiza IIIFacelift 2006Cupra 1.8 T | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| SeatToledo III (5P)2.0 TDI | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Seat Toledo III (5P) 2.0 TDI and Seat Ibiza III Facelift 2006 Cupra 1.8 T: 1.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatIbiza IIIFacelift 2006Cupra 1.8 T | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
| SeatToledo III (5P)2.0 TDI | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatIbiza IIIFacelift 2006Cupra 1.8 T | 563 km 350 mi |
| SeatToledo III (5P)2.0 TDI | 887 km 551 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatIbiza IIIFacelift 2006Cupra 1.8 T | 180 hp 134 kW | 7.3 s | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| SeatToledo III (5P)2.0 TDI | 170 hp 127 kW | 8.6 s | 211 km/h 131 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatIbiza IIIFacelift 2006Cupra 1.8 T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SeatToledo III (5P)2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatIbiza IIIFacelift 2006Cupra 1.8 T |
| 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| SeatToledo III (5P)2.0 TDI |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Seat Ibiza III Facelift 2006 Cupra 1.8 T is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SeatIbiza IIIFacelift 2006Cupra 1.8 T | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
| SeatToledo III (5P)2.0 TDI | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SeatIbiza IIIFacelift 2006Cupra 1.8 T | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| SeatToledo III (5P)2.0 TDI | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SeatIbiza IIIFacelift 2006Cupra 1.8 T | SeatToledo III (5P)2.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 180 hp 134 kW | 170 hp 127 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 245 Nm 181 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 8.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 211 km/h 131 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,177 kg 2,595 lb | 1,454 kg 3,206 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 563 km 350 mi | 887 km 551 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 267 L 9.4 cu ft | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Seat Ibiza III Facelift 2006 Cupra 1.8 T | Seat Toledo III (5P) 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.00 LC100 km | 10.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,100 LC/year | 1,628 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Seat Ibiza III Facelift 2006 Cupra 1.8 T
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 277 kg lighter
- Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 18 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
- Has 36 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Seat Toledo III (5P) 2.0 TDI
- Has 105 Nm more
- Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 325 km (202 mi) more estimated range
- Has 233 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























