Car comparison

Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSIvsRenault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volkswagen Scirocco III

2.0 TSI

210 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedCoupe2009-2014
VS

Renault Laguna Coupe

2.0 16V Turbo

205 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedCoupe2008-2012

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    240 km/h
    149 mph
  • Most powerful
    210 hp
    157 kW
  • Lightest
    1,298 kg
    2,862 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    162 hp/t
    121 kW/t
    6.2 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.4 L/100 km
    31.8 mpg US
    38.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    10.1 L/100 km
    23.3 mpg US
    28.0 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.9 L/100 km
    39.9 mpg US
    47.9 mpg UK
  • Best overall score
    54/100
  • Best performance score
    55/100
  • Best economy score
    87/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSIRenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
Power
210hp157kW
205hp153kW
Torque
280Nm207lb-ft
300Nm221lb-ft
Curb weight
1,298kg2,862lb
1,503kg3,314lb
Gross weight
1,740kg3,836lb
1,923kg4,239lb
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
236 km/h
147 mph
To 99% top speed
84.2s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
97.2s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.9s
7.8s
0-200 km/h
28.0s
Calculated
33.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.5s
Calculated
7.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK
10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.9s
Calculated
15.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
162hp/t121kW/t73hp/1000 lb
Calculated
136hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
216Nm/t144lb-ft/ton
Calculated
200Nm/t134lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
743km462mi
Calculated
825km513mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,256mm168in
4,643mm183in
Width
1,810mm71in
1,811mm71in
Height
1,404mm55in
1,400mm55in
Wheelbase
2,578mm101in
2,690mm106in
Front track
1,569mm62in
-
Rear track
1,575mm62in
-
Ground clearance
136mm5in
-
Trunk volume
312L
423L
Max trunk volume
1,006L
-
Doors
3
2
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
55L
66L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSIRenault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V TurboPowerTorque
  • Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI5,300-6,200 rpm1,700-5,200 rpm6,450 rpm
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo5,000 rpm3,000 rpm5,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSIRenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.5 s
7.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.9 s
7.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
28.0 s
33.5 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
236 km/h
147 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.8 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.6 s
13.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.9 s
15.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
155 km/h
97 mph
148 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI
210 hp
157 kW
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
205 hp
153 kW

Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI has 5 hp more than Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo.

The biggest power difference is between Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo and Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI: 5 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
300 Nm
221 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI
1,298 kg
2,862 lb
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
1,503 kg
3,314 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI
240 km/h
149 mph
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
236 km/h
147 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI6.9 s
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo7.8 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI and Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo: 0.9 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI and Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo: 0.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI
162 hp/t
121 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
136 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI
743 km
462 mi
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
825 km
513 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI
210 hp
157 kW
6.9 s
240 km/h
149 mph
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
205 hp
153 kW
7.8 s
236 km/h
147 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI
Power
210 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
312 L
11.0 cu ft
Length
4,256 mm
167.6 in
Height
1,404 mm
55.3 in
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
Power
205 hp
153 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
236 km/h
147 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
423 L
14.9 cu ft
Length
4,643 mm
182.8 in
Height
1,400 mm
55.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI
Power
210 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
Power
205 hp
153 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
236 km/h
147 mph
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK

Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
6.9 s
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
7.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI
162 hp/t
121 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
136 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSIRenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
Power
210 hp
157 kW
205 hp
153 kW
Torque
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.9 s
7.8 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
236 km/h
147 mph
Lightness
1,298 kg
2,862 lb
1,503 kg
3,314 lb
Fuel consumption
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
312 L
11.0 cu ft
Length
4,256 mm
167.6 in
Height
1,404 mm
55.3 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
423 L
14.9 cu ft
Length
4,643 mm
182.8 in
Height
1,400 mm
55.1 in
Range score
743 km
462 mi
825 km
513 mi
Trunk score
312 L
11.0 cu ft
423 L
14.9 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
162 hp/t
121 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
136 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSIRenault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo
Consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.95 LC100 km14.00 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi20.84 LC100 mi22.53 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,943 LC/year2,100 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI

  • Has 5 hp more
  • Is 205 kg lighter
  • Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 25 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Smallest trunk

Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo

  • Has 20 Nm more
  • Has 82 km (51 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 111 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI
Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TSI
GTS 2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 2014GTS 2.0 TSI
2.0 16V Turbo
2.0 i 16V GT
VS
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V TurbovsRenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
2.0 16V Turbo
2.0 i 16V GT
VS
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V TurbovsRenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GT
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenEos2.0 TSI
2.0 16V Turbo
2.0 dCi FAP
VS
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V TurbovsRenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
2.0 TSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSIvsAUDITT Coupe (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI
2.0 16V Turbo
2.0 dCi FAP
VS
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V TurbovsRenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP
2.0 TSI
1.6 THP
VS
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSIvsPeugeotRCZ1.6 THP
2.0 16V Turbo
2.9 24V
VS
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V TurbovsRenaultLaguna2.9 24V
2.0 TSI
2.5 T5 20V
VS
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSIvsVolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V
2.0 16V Turbo
2.9 24V
VS
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V TurbovsRenaultLaguna Grandtour2.9 24V
Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI vs Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo - car comparison - FastVsFaster