Renault Espace IV (PHASE II)
Car comparison
Renault Espace IV (PHASE II) 3.5 V6vsVolkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Sharan II
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSI
- Lightest1,790 kg3,946 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.4 L/100 km28.0 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions196 g/km
- Best estimated range833 km518 mi
- Largest trunk885 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best economy score84/100
- Best practicality score96/100
Renault Espace IV (PHASE II) 3.5 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.1 s
- Fastest top speed225 km/h140 mph
- Most powerful241 hp180 kW
- Highest torque330 Nm243 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight131 hp/t97 kW/t7.7 kg/hp
- Best performance score49/100
Specification comparison
| Model | RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6 | VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 241hp180kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 330Nm243lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,845kg4,068lb | 1,790kg3,946lb |
| Gross weight | 2,545kg5,611lb | 2,360kg5,203lb |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 110.5s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 100.7s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.1s | 8.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 43.2s Calculated | 47.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.6s Calculated | 7.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 17.2L/100 km13.7mpg US16.4mpg UK | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.9s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 131hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated | 112hp/t83kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 179Nm/t120lb-ft/ton Calculated | 156Nm/t105lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 692km430mi Calculated | 833km518mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,498cc213cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,656mm183in | 4,854mm191in |
| Width | 1,860mm73in | 1,904mm75in |
| Height | 1,728mm68in | 1,720mm68in |
| Wheelbase | 2,803mm110in | 2,919mm115in |
| Front track | 1,574mm62in | 1,569mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,556mm61in | 1,617mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 120mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 291L | 885L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,860L | 2,430L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 7 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 83L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 284g/km | 196g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Renault Espace IV (PHASE II) 3.5 V6: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6 | 6,000 rpm | 3,600 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI | 5,100 rpm | 1,700-5,000 rpm | 5,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6 | VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.6 s | 7.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.1 s | 8.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 43.2 s | 47.2 s |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.3 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.9 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 142 km/h 88 mph | 141 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6 | 241 hp 180 kW |
| VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
Renault Espace IV (PHASE II) 3.5 V6 has 41 hp more than Volkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSI and Renault Espace IV (PHASE II) 3.5 V6: 41 hp (31 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6 | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6 | 1,845 kg 4,068 lb |
| VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI | 1,790 kg 3,946 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6 | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI | 218 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6 | 8.1 s |
| VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI | 8.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Renault Espace IV (PHASE II) 3.5 V6 and Volkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSI: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6 | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSI and Renault Espace IV (PHASE II) 3.5 V6: 3.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6 | 131 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI | 112 hp/t 83 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6 | 692 km 430 mi |
| VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI | 833 km 518 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6 | 241 hp 180 kW | 8.1 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 8.3 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6 |
| 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6 | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | 8.1 s |
| VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6 | 131 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI | 112 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6 | VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 241 hp 180 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.1 s | 8.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,845 kg 4,068 lb | 1,790 kg 3,946 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 692 km 430 mi | 833 km 518 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 284 g/km | 196 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 291 L 10.3 cu ft | 885 L 31.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 131 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 112 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Renault Espace IV (PHASE II) 3.5 V6 | Volkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.00 LC100 km | 14.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 33.80 LC100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,800 L476 US gal396 UK gal | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,150 LC/year | 2,205 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Renault Espace IV (PHASE II) 3.5 V6
- Has 41 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSI
- Is 55 kg lighter
- Uses 3.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 142 km (88 mi) more estimated range
- Has 594 L more trunk volume
- Emits 88 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























