Renault Clio Sport (PHASE II)
Car comparison
Renault Clio Sport (PHASE II) 3.0i V6 24VvsRenault Vel Satis 3.5 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Vel Satis
3.5 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Renault Vel Satis 3.5 V6
- Highest torque330 Nm243 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range696 km432 mi
- Largest trunk460 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best economy score76/100
- Best practicality score79/100
Renault Clio Sport (PHASE II) 3.0i V6 24V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.8 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph
- Most powerful254 hp189 kW
- Lightest1,400 kg3,086 lb
- Best power-to-weight181 hp/t135 kW/t5.5 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption15.6 L/100 km15.1 mpg US18.1 mpg UK
- Best performance score60/100
Specification comparison
| Model | RenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24V | RenaultVel Satis3.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 254hp189kW | 241hp180kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 330Nm243lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,400kg3,086lb | 1,720kg3,792lb |
| Gross weight | 1,610kg3,549lb | 2,270kg5,004lb |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 69.8s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 104.6s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.8s | 8.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.3s Calculated | 36.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.5s Calculated | 7.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.6L/100 km15.1mpg US18.1mpg UK | 16.8L/100 km14mpg US16.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.9s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 181hp/t135kW/t82hp/1000 lb Calculated | 140hp/t104kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 214Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated | 192Nm/t128lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 513km319mi Calculated | 696km432mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,946cc180cu in | 3,498cc213cu in |
| Length | 3,841mm151in | 4,860mm191in |
| Width | 1,830mm72in | 1,860mm73in |
| Height | 1,351mm53in | 1,575mm62in |
| Wheelbase | 2,532mm100in | 2,840mm112in |
| Front track | 1,518mm60in | 1,575mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,470mm58in | 1,550mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 45L | 460L |
| Max trunk volume | 67L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 5 |
| Seats | 2 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 61L | 80L |
| CO2 emissions | 285g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Renault Clio Sport (PHASE II) 3.0i V6 24V: Power / Torque
- Renault Vel Satis 3.5 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24V | 7,150 rpm | 4,650 rpm | 7,400 rpm |
| RenaultVel Satis3.5 V6 | 6,000 rpm | 3,600 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | RenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24V | RenaultVel Satis3.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.5 s | 7.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.8 s | 8.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.3 s | 36.4 s |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.7 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.9 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 167 km/h 104 mph | 145 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24V | 254 hp 189 kW |
| RenaultVel Satis3.5 V6 | 241 hp 180 kW |
Renault Clio Sport (PHASE II) 3.0i V6 24V has 13 hp more than Renault Vel Satis 3.5 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Renault Vel Satis 3.5 V6 and Renault Clio Sport (PHASE II) 3.0i V6 24V: 13 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24V | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| RenaultVel Satis3.5 V6 | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24V | 1,400 kg 3,086 lb |
| RenaultVel Satis3.5 V6 | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24V | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| RenaultVel Satis3.5 V6 | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24V | 5.8 s |
| RenaultVel Satis3.5 V6 | 8.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Renault Clio Sport (PHASE II) 3.0i V6 24V and Renault Vel Satis 3.5 V6: 2.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24V | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK |
| RenaultVel Satis3.5 V6 | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24V | 181 hp/t 135 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
| RenaultVel Satis3.5 V6 | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24V | 513 km 319 mi |
| RenaultVel Satis3.5 V6 | 696 km 432 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24V | 254 hp 189 kW | 5.8 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| RenaultVel Satis3.5 V6 | 241 hp 180 kW | 8.3 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultVel Satis3.5 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24V |
| 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| RenaultVel Satis3.5 V6 |
| 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Renault Clio Sport (PHASE II) 3.0i V6 24V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24V | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | 5.8 s |
| RenaultVel Satis3.5 V6 | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24V | 181 hp/t 135 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK |
| RenaultVel Satis3.5 V6 | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | RenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24V | RenaultVel Satis3.5 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 254 hp 189 kW | 241 hp 180 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.8 s | 8.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,400 kg 3,086 lb | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 513 km 319 mi | 696 km 432 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 285 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 45 L 1.6 cu ft | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 181 hp/t 135 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Renault Clio Sport (PHASE II) 3.0i V6 24V | Renault Vel Satis 3.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.9 L/100 km19.8 mpg US23.7 mpg UK | 11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.83 LC100 km | 20.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 33.51 LC100 mi | 32.39 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,785 L472 US gal393 UK gal | 1,725 L456 US gal379 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,124 LC/year | 3,019 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Renault Clio Sport (PHASE II) 3.0i V6 24V
- Has 13 hp more
- Is 320 kg lighter
- Is 2.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 41 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Renault Vel Satis 3.5 V6
- Has 30 Nm more
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 183 km (114 mi) more estimated range
- Has 415 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























