Skoda Octavia II · Facelift 2009
Car comparison
Skoda Octavia II · Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSIvsRenault Clio III (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Clio III (PHASE II)
RS 2.0 16V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Octavia II Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSI
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph
- Highest torque280 Nm207 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range733 km456 mi
- Largest trunk585 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score87/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Renault Clio III (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Most powerful201 hp150 kW
- Lightest1,204 kg2,654 lb
- Best power-to-weight167 hp/t124 kW/t6.0 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaOctavia IIFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI | RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 201hp150kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 215Nm159lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,450kg3,197lb | 1,204kg2,654lb |
| Gross weight | 1,930kg4,255lb | 1,690kg3,726lb |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 86.2s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 73.8s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.1s Calculated | 31.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | 11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 138hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated | 167hp/t124kW/t76hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 193Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated | 179Nm/t119lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 733km456mi Calculated | 671km417mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,569mm180in | 4,017mm158in |
| Width | 1,769mm70in | 1,769mm70in |
| Height | 1,462mm58in | 1,484mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,578mm101in | 2,585mm102in |
| Front track | 1,541mm61in | 1,520mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,514mm60in | 1,520mm60in |
| Ground clearance | - | 120mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 585L | 288L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,455L | 1,038L |
| Doors | 5 | 3 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 55L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Octavia II Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Renault Clio III (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI | 5,100 rpm | 1,800 rpm | 5,350 rpm |
| RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | 7,100 rpm | 5,400 rpm | 7,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaOctavia IIFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI | RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.1 s | 31.5 s |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 14.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 95 mph | 154 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
| RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | 201 hp 150 kW |
Renault Clio III (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V has 1 hp more than Skoda Octavia II Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Skoda Octavia II Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSI and Renault Clio III (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V: 1 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | 215 Nm 159 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb |
| RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | 1,204 kg 2,654 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | 225 km/h 140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI | 7.3 s |
| RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | 6.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Renault Clio III (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V and Skoda Octavia II Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSI: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Skoda Octavia II Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSI and Renault Clio III (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
| RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | 167 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI | 733 km 456 mi |
| RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | 671 km 417 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.3 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | 201 hp 150 kW | 6.9 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V |
| 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Skoda Octavia II Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
| RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | 167 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaOctavia IIFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI | RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 201 hp 150 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 215 Nm 159 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb | 1,204 kg 2,654 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 733 km 456 mi | 671 km 417 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 585 L 20.7 cu ft | 288 L 10.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 167 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Octavia II Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSI | Renault Clio III (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK | 8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.13 LC100 km | 14.35 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi | 23.09 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal | 1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,969 LC/year | 2,153 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Octavia II Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSI
- Has 65 Nm more
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 63 km (39 mi) more estimated range
- Has 297 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Renault Clio III (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V
- Has 1 hp more
- Is 246 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 29 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























