Skoda Octavia II · Facelift 2009
Car comparison
Skoda Octavia II · Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSIvsAUDI A3 (8P) · Facelift 2008 2.0 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI A3 (8P) · Facelift 2008
2.0 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A3 (8P) Facelift 2008 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.8 s
- Lightest1,330 kg2,932 lb
- Best power-to-weight150 hp/t112 kW/t6.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.8 L/100 km24.0 mpg US28.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range764 km475 mi
- Best performance score53/100
Skoda Octavia II Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSI
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Highest torque280 Nm207 lb-ft
- Largest trunk585 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best economy score87/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaOctavia IIFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI | AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,450kg3,197lb | 1,330kg2,932lb |
| Gross weight | 1,930kg4,255lb | 1,890kg4,167lb |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 86.2s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 78.8s99% target: 236 km/h / 146 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 6.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.1s Calculated | 27.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 138hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated | 150hp/t112kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 193Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated | 211Nm/t141lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 733km456mi Calculated | 764km475mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,569mm180in | 4,238mm167in |
| Width | 1,769mm70in | 1,765mm69in |
| Height | 1,462mm58in | 1,421mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,578mm101in | 2,578mm101in |
| Front track | 1,541mm61in | 1,534mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,514mm60in | 1,507mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 585L | 350L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,455L | 1,080L |
| Doors | 5 | 3 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 55L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Octavia II Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- AUDI A3 (8P) Facelift 2008 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI | 5,100 rpm | 1,800 rpm | 5,350 rpm |
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 5,100 rpm | 1,700-5,000 rpm | 5,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaOctavia IIFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI | AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 6.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.1 s | 27.4 s |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 95 mph | 157 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb |
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 1,330 kg 2,932 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 238 km/h 148 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI | 7.3 s |
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 6.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A3 (8P) Facelift 2008 2.0 TFSI and Skoda Octavia II Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSI: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI | 733 km 456 mi |
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 764 km 475 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.3 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 6.8 s | 238 km/h 148 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI |
| 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A3 (8P) Facelift 2008 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaOctavia IIFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI | AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 6.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 238 km/h 148 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb | 1,330 kg 2,932 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 733 km 456 mi | 764 km 475 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 585 L 20.7 cu ft | 350 L 12.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Octavia II Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSI | AUDI A3 (8P) Facelift 2008 2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK | 7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.13 LC100 km | 12.60 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi | 20.28 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal | 1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,969 LC/year | 1,890 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Octavia II Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSI
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 235 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
AUDI A3 (8P) Facelift 2008 2.0 TFSI
- Is 120 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 31 km (19 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























