Renault Laguna
Car comparison
Renault Laguna 2.9 24VvsRenault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Clio III (PHASE I)
RS 2.0 16V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Most powerful197 hp147 kW
- Lightest1,260 kg2,778 lb
- Best power-to-weight156 hp/t117 kW/t6.4 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption12.2 L/100 km19.3 mpg US23.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score83/100
Renault Laguna 2.9 24V
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Highest torque267 Nm197 lb-ft
- Largest trunk450 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | RenaultLaguna2.9 24V | RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 197hp147kW |
| Torque | 267Nm197lb-ft | 215Nm159lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,375kg3,031lb | 1,260kg2,778lb |
| Gross weight | 1,965kg4,332lb | 1,690kg3,726lb |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 88.7s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 69.7s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.7s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.0s Calculated | 36.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.3s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.1L/100 km14.6mpg US17.5mpg UK | 12.2L/100 km19.3mpg US23.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 138hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated | 156hp/t117kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 194Nm/t130lb-ft/ton Calculated | 171Nm/t114lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 618km384mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,946cc180cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,510mm178in | 3,991mm157in |
| Width | 1,750mm69in | 1,768mm70in |
| Height | 1,430mm56in | 1,477mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,585mm102in |
| Front track | 1,480mm58in | 1,370mm54in |
| Rear track | 1,460mm57in | 1,360mm54in |
| Ground clearance | - | 113mm4in |
| Trunk volume | 450L | 288L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,335L | 1,028L |
| Doors | 5 | 3 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 55L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Renault Laguna 2.9 24V: Power / Torque
- Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna2.9 24V | 5,750 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V | 7,250 rpm | 5,550 rpm | 7,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | RenaultLaguna2.9 24V | RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.3 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.7 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.0 s | 36.9 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 15.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 152 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna2.9 24V | 190 hp 142 kW |
| RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V | 197 hp 147 kW |
Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V has 7 hp more than Renault Laguna 2.9 24V.
The biggest power difference is between Renault Laguna 2.9 24V and Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna2.9 24V | 267 Nm 197 lb-ft |
| RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V | 215 Nm 159 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna2.9 24V | 1,375 kg 3,031 lb |
| RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V | 1,260 kg 2,778 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna2.9 24V | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V | 215 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna2.9 24V | 7.7 s |
| RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V | 6.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V and Renault Laguna 2.9 24V: 0.8 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna2.9 24V | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
| RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V | 156 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna2.9 24V | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.7 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V | 197 hp 147 kW | 6.9 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna2.9 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | RenaultLaguna2.9 24V | RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 197 hp 147 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 267 Nm 197 lb-ft | 215 Nm 159 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.7 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,375 kg 3,031 lb | 1,260 kg 2,778 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 618 km 384 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | 288 L 10.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 156 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.07 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,335 L353 US gal294 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,336 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Renault Laguna 2.9 24V
- Has 52 Nm more
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 162 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V
- Has 7 hp more
- Is 115 kg lighter
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























