Seat Ibiza III
Car comparison
Seat Ibiza III Cupra 1.8 i 20VvsRenault Clio II (PHASE III) 2.0 16V Sport
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Clio II (PHASE III)
2.0 16V Sport
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Seat Ibiza III Cupra 1.8 i 20V
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph
- Most powerful180 hp134 kW
- Highest torque245 Nm181 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
- Largest trunk265 L
- Best overall score54/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best practicality score63/100
Renault Clio II (PHASE III) 2.0 16V Sport
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Lightest1,110 kg2,447 lb
- Best power-to-weight161 hp/t120 kW/t6.2 kg/hp
- Best economy score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SeatIbiza IIICupra 1.8 i 20V | RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 180hp134kW | 179hp133kW |
| Torque | 245Nm181lb-ft | 200Nm148lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,177kg2,595lb | 1,110kg2,447lb |
| Gross weight | 1,650kg3,638lb | - |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 77.3s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 70.6s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 7.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.8s Calculated | 32.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 6.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK | 11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated | 161hp/t120kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated | 180Nm/t121lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 617km384mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,781cc109cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 3,955mm156in | 3,811mm150in |
| Width | 1,700mm67in | 1,639mm65in |
| Height | 1,440mm57in | 1,409mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,460mm97in | 2,471mm97in |
| Front track | 1,435mm56in | 1,418mm56in |
| Rear track | 1,425mm56in | 1,392mm55in |
| Trunk volume | 265L | 255L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,030L | 1,037L |
| Doors | 3 | 3 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 45L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 194g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Seat Ibiza III Cupra 1.8 i 20V: Power / Torque
- Renault Clio II (PHASE III) 2.0 16V Sport: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatIbiza IIICupra 1.8 i 20V | 5,800 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 6,050 rpm |
| RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport | 6,500 rpm | 5,250 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SeatIbiza IIICupra 1.8 i 20V | RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 6.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 7.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.8 s | 32.5 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 12.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 153 km/h 95 mph | 153 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatIbiza IIICupra 1.8 i 20V | 180 hp 134 kW |
| RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport | 179 hp 133 kW |
Seat Ibiza III Cupra 1.8 i 20V has 1 hp more than Renault Clio II (PHASE III) 2.0 16V Sport.
The biggest power difference is between Renault Clio II (PHASE III) 2.0 16V Sport and Seat Ibiza III Cupra 1.8 i 20V: 1 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatIbiza IIICupra 1.8 i 20V | 245 Nm 181 lb-ft |
| RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport | 200 Nm 148 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatIbiza IIICupra 1.8 i 20V | 1,177 kg 2,595 lb |
| RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport | 1,110 kg 2,447 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatIbiza IIICupra 1.8 i 20V | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport | 222 km/h 138 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatIbiza IIICupra 1.8 i 20V | 7.3 s |
| RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport | 7.1 s |
Although Seat Ibiza III Cupra 1.8 i 20V has more power, Renault Clio II (PHASE III) 2.0 16V Sport is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Renault Clio II (PHASE III) 2.0 16V Sport and Seat Ibiza III Cupra 1.8 i 20V: 0.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatIbiza IIICupra 1.8 i 20V | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
| RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatIbiza IIICupra 1.8 i 20V | 180 hp 134 kW | 7.3 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport | 179 hp 133 kW | 7.1 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatIbiza IIICupra 1.8 i 20V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SeatIbiza IIICupra 1.8 i 20V | RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 180 hp 134 kW | 179 hp 133 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 245 Nm 181 lb-ft | 200 Nm 148 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 7.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,177 kg 2,595 lb | 1,110 kg 2,447 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 617 km 384 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 194 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 265 L 9.4 cu ft | 255 L 9.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Renault Clio II (PHASE III) 2.0 16V Sport |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.17 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.81 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,126 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Seat Ibiza III Cupra 1.8 i 20V
- Has 1 hp more
- Has 45 Nm more
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
- Has 10 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Renault Clio II (PHASE III) 2.0 16V Sport
- Is 67 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























