Car comparison

Renault Megane II (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16VvsRenault Clio II (PHASE III) 2.0 16V Sport

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Renault Megane II (PHASE II)

RS 2.0 16V

224 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedHatchback2006-2008
VS

Renault Clio II (PHASE III)

2.0 16V Sport

179 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDManualNaturally aspiratedHatchback2003-2006

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Renault Megane II (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.5 s
  • Fastest top speed
    236 km/h
    147 mph
  • Most powerful
    224 hp
    167 kW
  • Highest torque
    300 Nm
    221 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    163 hp/t
    121 kW/t
    6.1 kg/hp
  • Best estimated range
    714 km
    444 mi
  • Largest trunk
    330 L
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best performance score
    56/100
  • Best practicality score
    72/100

Renault Clio II (PHASE III) 2.0 16V Sport

  • Lightest
    1,110 kg
    2,447 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.1 L/100 km
    29.0 mpg US
    34.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    11.3 L/100 km
    20.8 mpg US
    25.0 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.2 L/100 km
    37.9 mpg US
    45.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    194 g/km
  • Best economy score
    85/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelRenaultMegane II (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16VRenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport
Power
224hp167kW
179hp133kW
Torque
300Nm221lb-ft
200Nm148lb-ft
Curb weight
1,375kg3,031lb
1,110kg2,447lb
Gross weight
1,820kg4,012lb
-
Top speed
236 km/h
147 mph
222 km/h
138 mph
To 99% top speed
72.5s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
70.6s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.5s
7.1s
0-200 km/h
26.2s
Calculated
32.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.2s
Calculated
6.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK
11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.6s
Calculated
15.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
163hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb
Calculated
161hp/t120kW/t73hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
218Nm/t146lb-ft/ton
Calculated
180Nm/t121lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
714km444mi
Calculated
617km384mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,228mm166in
3,811mm150in
Width
1,777mm70in
1,639mm65in
Height
1,436mm57in
1,409mm55in
Wheelbase
2,617mm103in
2,471mm97in
Front track
1,517mm60in
1,418mm56in
Rear track
1,521mm60in
1,392mm55in
Trunk volume
330L
255L
Max trunk volume
1,190L
1,037L
Doors
5
3
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
60L
50L
CO2 emissions
199g/km
194g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Renault Megane II (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16VRenault Clio II (PHASE III) 2.0 16V SportPowerTorque
  • Renault Megane II (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V: Power / Torque
  • Renault Clio II (PHASE III) 2.0 16V Sport: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
RenaultMegane II (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V5,500 rpm3,000 rpm5,750 rpm
RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport6,500 rpm5,250 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricRenaultMegane II (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16VRenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.2 s
6.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.5 s
7.1 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
26.2 s
32.5 s
Top speed
236 km/h
147 mph
222 km/h
138 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.4 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.5 s
9.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.3 s
12.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.6 s
15.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
159 km/h
99 mph
153 km/h
95 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultMegane II (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V
224 hp
167 kW
RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport
179 hp
133 kW

Renault Megane II (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V has 45 hp more than Renault Clio II (PHASE III) 2.0 16V Sport.

The biggest power difference is between Renault Clio II (PHASE III) 2.0 16V Sport and Renault Megane II (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V: 45 hp (34 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultMegane II (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport
200 Nm
148 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultMegane II (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V
1,375 kg
3,031 lb
RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport
1,110 kg
2,447 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultMegane II (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V
236 km/h
147 mph
RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport
222 km/h
138 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultMegane II (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V6.5 s
RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport7.1 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Renault Megane II (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V and Renault Clio II (PHASE III) 2.0 16V Sport: 0.6 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultMegane II (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultMegane II (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V
163 hp/t
121 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp
RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport
161 hp/t
120 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultMegane II (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V
714 km
444 mi
RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport
617 km
384 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
RenaultMegane II (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V
224 hp
167 kW
6.5 s
236 km/h
147 mph
RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport
179 hp
133 kW
7.1 s
222 km/h
138 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
RenaultMegane II (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V
Power
224 hp
167 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
236 km/h
147 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
330 L
11.7 cu ft
Length
4,228 mm
166.5 in
Height
1,436 mm
56.5 in
RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport
Power
179 hp
133 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
5 seats
Trunk
255 L
9.0 cu ft
Length
3,811 mm
150.0 in
Height
1,409 mm
55.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
RenaultMegane II (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V
Power
224 hp
167 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
236 km/h
147 mph
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport
Power
179 hp
133 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK

Renault Megane II (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
RenaultMegane II (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
6.5 s
RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
7.1 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
RenaultMegane II (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V
163 hp/t
121 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport
161 hp/t
120 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleRenaultMegane II (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16VRenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport
Power
224 hp
167 kW
179 hp
133 kW
Torque
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
200 Nm
148 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.5 s
7.1 s
Top speed
236 km/h
147 mph
222 km/h
138 mph
Lightness
1,375 kg
3,031 lb
1,110 kg
2,447 lb
Fuel consumption
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
330 L
11.7 cu ft
Length
4,228 mm
166.5 in
Height
1,436 mm
56.5 in
Doors/seats
3 doors
5 seats
Trunk
255 L
9.0 cu ft
Length
3,811 mm
150.0 in
Height
1,409 mm
55.5 in
Range score
714 km
444 mi
617 km
384 mi
CO2 score
199 g/km
194 g/km
Trunk score
330 L
11.7 cu ft
255 L
9.0 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
163 hp/t
121 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp
161 hp/t
120 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleRenault Megane II (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16VRenault Clio II (PHASE III) 2.0 16V Sport
Consumption8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.70 LC100 km14.17 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi23.66 LC100 mi22.81 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,205 LC/year2,126 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Renault Megane II (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V

  • Has 45 hp more
  • Has 100 Nm more
  • Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 14 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 97 km (60 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 75 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Renault Clio II (PHASE III) 2.0 16V Sport

  • Is 265 kg lighter
  • Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Emits 5 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Renault Megane II (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V
Renault Clio II (PHASE III) 2.0 16V Sport
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

RS 2.0 16V
RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
VS
RenaultMegane II (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16VvsRenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V
2.0 16V Sport
RS 2.0 16V
VS
RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V SportvsRenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
RS 2.0 16V
GT 2.0 TCe
VS
RenaultMegane II (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16VvsRenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe
2.0 16V Sport
RS 2.0 16V
VS
RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V SportvsRenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V
RS 2.0 16V
RS 2.0 16V
VS
RenaultMegane II (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16VvsRenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V
2.0 16V Sport
3.0 V6
VS
RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V SportvsRenaultClio Sport (PHASE I)3.0 V6
RS 2.0 16V
GT 2.0 TCe
VS
RenaultMegane II (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16VvsRenaultMegane III (PHASE II)GT 2.0 TCe
2.0 16V Sport
3.0i V6 24V
VS
RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V SportvsRenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24V
RS 2.0 16V
GT 1.6 Energy TCe
VS
RenaultMegane II (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16VvsRenaultMegane IVGT 1.6 Energy TCe
2.0 16V Sport
2.0 i 16V GT
VS
RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V SportvsRenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GT
RS 2.0 16V
RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
VS
RenaultMegane II (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16VvsRenaultMegane II CoupeRS 2.0 Turbo 16V
RS 2.0 16V
RS 2.0 16V
VS
RenaultMegane II (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16VvsRenaultMegane III CoupeRS 2.0 16V
Renault Megane II (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V vs Renault Clio II (PHASE III) 2.0 16V Sport - car comparison - FastVsFaster