Volvo V40 Cross Country · Facelift 2016
Car comparison
Volvo V40 Cross Country · Facelift 2016 2.0 T3vsRenault Captur II 1.3 TCe
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Captur II
1.3 TCe
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo V40 Cross Country Facelift 2016 2.0 T3
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.5 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,127 km700 mi
- Best performance score43/100
- Best economy score92/100
Renault Captur II 1.3 TCe
- Most powerful154 hp115 kW
- Highest torque270 Nm199 lb-ft
- Lightest1,266 kg2,791 lb
- Best power-to-weight122 hp/t91 kW/t8.2 kg/hp
- Largest trunk536 L
- Best overall score56/100
- Best practicality score83/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 T3 | RenaultCaptur II1.3 TCe |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 152hp113kW | 154hp115kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 270Nm199lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,494kg3,294lb | 1,266kg2,791lb |
| Gross weight | 1,970kg4,343lb | 1,811kg3,993lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | 202 km/h 126 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 100.2s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 83.7s99% target: 200 km/h / 124 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.5s | 8.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 45.3s Calculated | 83.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.0s Calculated | 8.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.2s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 102hp/t76kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated | 122hp/t91kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 167Nm/t112lb-ft/ton Calculated | 213Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,127km700mi Calculated | 857km533mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,333cc81cu in |
| Length | 4,370mm172in | 4,227mm166in |
| Width | 1,783mm70in | 1,797mm71in |
| Height | 1,470mm58in | 1,585mm62in |
| Wheelbase | 2,646mm104in | 2,639mm104in |
| Front track | 1,552mm61in | 1,560mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,540mm61in | 1,544mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 153mm6in | 174mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 324L | 536L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,500L | 1,275L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 48L |
| CO2 emissions | 128g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo V40 Cross Country Facelift 2016 2.0 T3: Power / Torque
- Renault Captur II 1.3 TCe: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 T3 | 5,000 rpm | 1,300-4,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| RenaultCaptur II1.3 TCe | 5,500 rpm | 1,800 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 T3 | RenaultCaptur II1.3 TCe |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.0 s | 8.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.5 s | 8.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 45.3 s | 83.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | 202 km/h 126 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.2 s | 16.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 141 km/h 88 mph | 139 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 T3 | 152 hp 113 kW |
| RenaultCaptur II1.3 TCe | 154 hp 115 kW |
Renault Captur II 1.3 TCe has 2 hp more than Volvo V40 Cross Country Facelift 2016 2.0 T3.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo V40 Cross Country Facelift 2016 2.0 T3 and Renault Captur II 1.3 TCe: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 T3 | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| RenaultCaptur II1.3 TCe | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 T3 | 1,494 kg 3,294 lb |
| RenaultCaptur II1.3 TCe | 1,266 kg 2,791 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 T3 | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| RenaultCaptur II1.3 TCe | 202 km/h 126 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 T3 | 8.5 s |
| RenaultCaptur II1.3 TCe | 8.6 s |
Although Renault Captur II 1.3 TCe has more power, Volvo V40 Cross Country Facelift 2016 2.0 T3 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo V40 Cross Country Facelift 2016 2.0 T3 and Renault Captur II 1.3 TCe: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 T3 | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
| RenaultCaptur II1.3 TCe | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 T3 | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp |
| RenaultCaptur II1.3 TCe | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 T3 | 1,127 km 700 mi |
| RenaultCaptur II1.3 TCe | 857 km 533 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 T3 | 152 hp 113 kW | 8.5 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| RenaultCaptur II1.3 TCe | 154 hp 115 kW | 8.6 s | 202 km/h 126 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 T3 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultCaptur II1.3 TCe |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 T3 |
| 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| RenaultCaptur II1.3 TCe |
| 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo V40 Cross Country Facelift 2016 2.0 T3 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 T3 | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
| RenaultCaptur II1.3 TCe | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 T3 | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
| RenaultCaptur II1.3 TCe | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 T3 | RenaultCaptur II1.3 TCe | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 152 hp 113 kW | 154 hp 115 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.5 s | 8.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | 202 km/h 126 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,494 kg 3,294 lb | 1,266 kg 2,791 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,127 km 700 mi | 857 km 533 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 128 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 324 L 11.4 cu ft | 536 L 18.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo V40 Cross Country Facelift 2016 2.0 T3 | Renault Captur II 1.3 TCe |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK | 5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.63 LC100 km | 9.80 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.49 LC100 mi | 15.77 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 825 L218 US gal181 UK gal | 840 L222 US gal185 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,444 LC/year | 1,470 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo V40 Cross Country Facelift 2016 2.0 T3
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 18 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 270 km (168 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Renault Captur II 1.3 TCe
- Has 2 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 228 kg lighter
- Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 212 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























