AUDI A1 citycarver (GB)
Car comparison
AUDI A1 citycarver (GB) 35 TFSIvsRenault Captur II 1.3 TCe
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Captur II
1.3 TCe
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A1 citycarver (GB) 35 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.2 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph
- Lightest1,205 kg2,657 lb
- Best power-to-weight124 hp/t93 kW/t8.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Best performance score46/100
- Best economy score92/100
Renault Captur II 1.3 TCe
- Most powerful154 hp115 kW
- Highest torque270 Nm199 lb-ft
- Best estimated range857 km533 mi
- Largest trunk536 L
- Best overall score56/100
- Best practicality score83/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | RenaultCaptur II1.3 TCe |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 154hp115kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 270Nm199lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,205kg2,657lb | 1,266kg2,791lb |
| Gross weight | 1,740kg3,836lb | 1,811kg3,993lb |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 202 km/h 126 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 85.6s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 83.7s99% target: 200 km/h / 124 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.2s | 8.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 40.3s Calculated | 83.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.8s Calculated | 8.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.0s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 124hp/t93kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated | 122hp/t91kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 207Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated | 213Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 741km460mi Calculated | 857km533mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,498cc91cu in | 1,333cc81cu in |
| Length | 4,046mm159in | 4,227mm166in |
| Width | 1,756mm69in | 1,797mm71in |
| Height | 1,483mm58in | 1,585mm62in |
| Wheelbase | 2,566mm101in | 2,639mm104in |
| Front track | 1,523mm60in | 1,560mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,505mm59in | 1,544mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 174mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 335L | 536L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,275L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 40L | 48L |
| CO2 emissions | 122g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A1 citycarver (GB) 35 TFSI: Power / Torque
- Renault Captur II 1.3 TCe: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,500-3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| RenaultCaptur II1.3 TCe | 5,500 rpm | 1,800 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | RenaultCaptur II1.3 TCe |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.8 s | 8.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.2 s | 8.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 40.3 s | 83.9 s |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 202 km/h 126 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.4 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.0 s | 16.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 145 km/h 90 mph | 139 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 150 hp 112 kW |
| RenaultCaptur II1.3 TCe | 154 hp 115 kW |
Renault Captur II 1.3 TCe has 4 hp more than AUDI A1 citycarver (GB) 35 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI A1 citycarver (GB) 35 TFSI and Renault Captur II 1.3 TCe: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| RenaultCaptur II1.3 TCe | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 1,205 kg 2,657 lb |
| RenaultCaptur II1.3 TCe | 1,266 kg 2,791 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| RenaultCaptur II1.3 TCe | 202 km/h 126 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 8.2 s |
| RenaultCaptur II1.3 TCe | 8.6 s |
Although Renault Captur II 1.3 TCe has more power, AUDI A1 citycarver (GB) 35 TFSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A1 citycarver (GB) 35 TFSI and Renault Captur II 1.3 TCe: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
| RenaultCaptur II1.3 TCe | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
| RenaultCaptur II1.3 TCe | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 741 km 460 mi |
| RenaultCaptur II1.3 TCe | 857 km 533 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.2 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| RenaultCaptur II1.3 TCe | 154 hp 115 kW | 8.6 s | 202 km/h 126 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultCaptur II1.3 TCe |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI |
| 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| RenaultCaptur II1.3 TCe |
| 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A1 citycarver (GB) 35 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
| RenaultCaptur II1.3 TCe | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
| RenaultCaptur II1.3 TCe | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | RenaultCaptur II1.3 TCe | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 154 hp 115 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.2 s | 8.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 202 km/h 126 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,205 kg 2,657 lb | 1,266 kg 2,791 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 741 km 460 mi | 857 km 533 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 122 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 335 L 11.8 cu ft | 536 L 18.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A1 citycarver (GB) 35 TFSI | Renault Captur II 1.3 TCe |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK | 5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.45 LC100 km | 9.80 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.21 LC100 mi | 15.77 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 810 L214 US gal178 UK gal | 840 L222 US gal185 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,418 LC/year | 1,470 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A1 citycarver (GB) 35 TFSI
- Is 61 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 18 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Renault Captur II 1.3 TCe
- Has 4 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Has 116 km (72 mi) more estimated range
- Has 201 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























