Car comparison

Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0vsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 T5

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Porsche Macan I (95B)

2.0

252 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2016-2018
VS

Volvo XC60 II

2.0 T5

250 hp1969 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2019

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    229 km/h
    142 mph
  • Most powerful
    252 hp
    188 kW
  • Highest torque
    370 Nm
    273 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,770 kg
    3,902 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    142 hp/t
    106 kW/t
    7.0 kg/hp
  • Lowest city consumption
    8.6 L/100 km
    27.4 mpg US
    32.8 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    878 km
    546 mi
  • Best overall score
    64/100
  • Best performance score
    55/100
  • Best economy score
    87/100

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5

  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.3 L/100 km
    32.2 mpg US
    38.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.2 L/100 km
    37.9 mpg US
    45.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    169 g/km
  • Largest trunk
    505 L
  • Best practicality score
    85/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelPorscheMacan I (95B)2.0VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
Power
252hp188kW
250hp186kW
Torque
370Nm273lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
1,770kg3,902lb
1,927kg4,248lb
Gross weight
2,445kg5,390lb
-
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
80.4s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
76.0s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.7s
6.9s
0-200 km/h
30.9s
Calculated
35.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.3s
Calculated
6.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK
9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.8s
Calculated
15.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
142hp/t106kW/t65hp/1000 lb
Calculated
130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
209Nm/t140lb-ft/ton
Calculated
182Nm/t122lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
878km546mi
Calculated
822km511mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,697mm185in
4,688mm185in
Width
1,923mm76in
1,902mm75in
Height
1,624mm64in
1,658mm65in
Wheelbase
2,807mm111in
2,865mm113in
Front track
1,655mm65in
1,668mm66in
Rear track
1,651mm65in
1,673mm66in
Ground clearance
185mm7in
216mm9in
Trunk volume
500L
505L
Max trunk volume
1,500L
1,432L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
65L
60L
CO2 emissions
172g/km
169g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5PowerTorque
  • Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.05,000-6,800 rpm1,600-4,500 rpm7,050 rpm
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T55,500 rpm1,800-4,800 rpm6,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricPorscheMacan I (95B)2.0VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.3 s
6.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.7 s
6.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
30.9 s
35.1 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.4 s
6.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.6 s
9.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.4 s
12.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.8 s
15.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
154 km/h
96 mph
151 km/h
94 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
252 hp
188 kW
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
250 hp
186 kW

Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0 has 2 hp more than Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5.

The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 and Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0: 2 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
370 Nm
273 lb-ft
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
1,770 kg
3,902 lb
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
1,927 kg
4,248 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
229 km/h
142 mph
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.06.7 s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T56.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0 and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
142 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
878 km
546 mi
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
822 km
511 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
252 hp
188 kW
6.7 s
229 km/h
142 mph
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
250 hp
186 kW
6.9 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
Power
252 hp
188 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,697 mm
184.9 in
Height
1,624 mm
63.9 in
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
Power
252 hp
188 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK

Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
6.7 s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
6.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
142 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehiclePorscheMacan I (95B)2.0VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
Power
252 hp
188 kW
250 hp
186 kW
Torque
370 Nm
273 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.7 s
6.9 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Lightness
1,770 kg
3,902 lb
1,927 kg
4,248 lb
Fuel consumption
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,697 mm
184.9 in
Height
1,624 mm
63.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
Range score
878 km
546 mi
822 km
511 mi
CO2 score
172 g/km
169 g/km
Trunk score
500 L
17.7 cu ft
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
142 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehiclePorsche Macan I (95B) 2.0Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5
Consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.95 LC100 km12.78 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi20.84 LC100 mi20.56 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,943 LC/year1,916 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0

  • Has 2 hp more
  • Has 20 Nm more
  • Is 157 kg lighter
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 56 km (35 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5

  • Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 5 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 3 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0
2.0
VS
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0vsPorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
2.0 T5
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
2.0
2.0
VS
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0vsPorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20212.0
2.0 T5
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsVolvoXC402.0 T5
2.0
3.0 diesel V6
VS
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0vsPorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.0 diesel V6
2.0 T5
25t
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsJaguarF-Pace25t
2.0
2.0 TFSI
VS
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TFSI
2.0 T5
2.0 P250
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsJaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
2.0
2.0 BiTDI
VS
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0vsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
2.0 T5
2.0i
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
2.0 T5
300
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsLexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
2.0
2.0 T5
VS
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0vsVolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0 vs Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 - car comparison - FastVsFaster