Porsche Cayman (981C)
Car comparison
Porsche Cayman (981C) 2.7vsSeat Leon III SC Cupra 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSeat Leon III SC
Cupra 2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Seat Leon III SC Cupra 2.0 TSI
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lightest1,300 kg2,866 lb
- Best power-to-weight204 hp/t152 kW/t4.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.7 L/100 km27.0 mpg US32.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Best overall score61/100
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score58/100
Porsche Cayman (981C) 2.7
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.6 s
- Fastest top speed264 km/h164 mph
- Most powerful275 hp205 kW
- Best estimated range810 km503 mi
- Largest trunk425 L
- Best performance score63/100
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | SeatLeon III SCCupra 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 275hp205kW | 265hp198kW |
| Torque | 290Nm214lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,360kg2,998lb | 1,300kg2,866lb |
| Gross weight | 1,685kg3,715lb | 1,870kg4,123lb |
| Top speed | 264 km/h 164 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 71.9s99% target: 261 km/h / 162 mph Calculated | 76.9s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.6s | 5.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.1s Calculated | 20.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.3s Calculated | 5.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.7s Calculated | 14.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 202hp/t151kW/t92hp/1000 lb Calculated | 204hp/t152kW/t92hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 213Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated | 269Nm/t180lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 810km503mi Calculated | 758km471mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,706cc165cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,380mm172in | 4,236mm167in |
| Width | 1,801mm71in | 1,810mm71in |
| Height | 1,294mm51in | 1,423mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,475mm97in | 2,596mm102in |
| Front track | - | 1,534mm60in |
| Rear track | - | 1,508mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 425L | 380L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,150L |
| Doors | 2 | 3 |
| Seats | 2 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | 183g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Cayman (981C) 2.7: Power / Torque
- Seat Leon III SC Cupra 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 7,400 rpm | 4,500-6,500 rpm | 7,650 rpm |
| SeatLeon III SCCupra 2.0 TSI | 5,350-6,600 rpm | 1,700-5,300 rpm | 6,850 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | SeatLeon III SCCupra 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.3 s | 5.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.6 s | 5.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.1 s | 20.8 s |
| Top speed | 264 km/h 164 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.0 s | 9.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.5 s | 11.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.7 s | 14.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 172 km/h 107 mph | 168 km/h 104 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 275 hp 205 kW |
| SeatLeon III SCCupra 2.0 TSI | 265 hp 198 kW |
Porsche Cayman (981C) 2.7 has 10 hp more than Seat Leon III SC Cupra 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Seat Leon III SC Cupra 2.0 TSI and Porsche Cayman (981C) 2.7: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 290 Nm 214 lb-ft |
| SeatLeon III SCCupra 2.0 TSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb |
| SeatLeon III SCCupra 2.0 TSI | 1,300 kg 2,866 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 264 km/h 164 mph |
| SeatLeon III SCCupra 2.0 TSI | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 5.6 s |
| SeatLeon III SCCupra 2.0 TSI | 5.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche Cayman (981C) 2.7 and Seat Leon III SC Cupra 2.0 TSI: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| SeatLeon III SCCupra 2.0 TSI | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Seat Leon III SC Cupra 2.0 TSI and Porsche Cayman (981C) 2.7: 1.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 202 hp/t 151 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp |
| SeatLeon III SCCupra 2.0 TSI | 204 hp/t 152 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 810 km 503 mi |
| SeatLeon III SCCupra 2.0 TSI | 758 km 471 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 275 hp 205 kW | 5.6 s | 264 km/h 164 mph |
| SeatLeon III SCCupra 2.0 TSI | 265 hp 198 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SeatLeon III SCCupra 2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 |
| 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| SeatLeon III SCCupra 2.0 TSI |
| 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Seat Leon III SC Cupra 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 5.6 s |
| SeatLeon III SCCupra 2.0 TSI | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 202 hp/t 151 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| SeatLeon III SCCupra 2.0 TSI | 204 hp/t 152 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | SeatLeon III SCCupra 2.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 275 hp 205 kW | 265 hp 198 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 290 Nm 214 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.6 s | 5.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 264 km/h 164 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb | 1,300 kg 2,866 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 810 km 503 mi | 758 km 471 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 183 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 425 L 15.0 cu ft | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 202 hp/t 151 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | 204 hp/t 152 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Cayman (981C) 2.7 | Seat Leon III SC Cupra 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK | 6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.83 LC100 km | 11.55 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi | 18.59 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal | 990 L262 US gal218 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,074 LC/year | 1,733 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Cayman (981C) 2.7
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 53 km (33 mi) more estimated range
- Has 45 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Seat Leon III SC Cupra 2.0 TSI
- Has 60 Nm more
- Is 60 kg lighter
- Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























