Porsche Cayenne II
Car comparison
Porsche Cayenne II Turbo S 4.8 V8vsPorsche Cayenne III 3.0 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPorsche Cayenne III
3.0 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche Cayenne III 3.0 V6
- Lightest1,985 kg4,376 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.3 L/100 km20.8 mpg US25.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.0 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions209 g/km
- Best estimated range815 km507 mi
- Largest trunk770 L
- Best economy score82/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Porsche Cayenne II Turbo S 4.8 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.5 s
- Fastest top speed283 km/h176 mph
- Most powerful550 hp410 kW
- Highest torque750 Nm553 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight248 hp/t185 kW/t4.0 kg/hp
- Best overall score86/100
- Best performance score84/100
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8 | PorscheCayenne III3.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 550hp410kW | 340hp254kW |
| Torque | 750Nm553lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,215kg4,883lb | 1,985kg4,376lb |
| Gross weight | 2,880kg6,349lb | 2,830kg6,239lb |
| Top speed | 283 km/h 176 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 63.5s99% target: 280 km/h / 174 mph Calculated | 80.1s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.5s | 6.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.4s Calculated | 24.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.3s Calculated | 5.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.8L/100 km14.9mpg US17.9mpg UK | 11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.5s Calculated | 14.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 248hp/t185kW/t113hp/1000 lb Calculated | 171hp/t128kW/t78hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 339Nm/t227lb-ft/ton Calculated | 227Nm/t152lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 739km459mi Calculated | 815km507mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,806cc293cu in | 2,995cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,846mm191in | 4,918mm194in |
| Width | 1,939mm76in | 1,983mm78in |
| Height | 1,705mm67in | 1,696mm67in |
| Wheelbase | 2,895mm114in | 2,895mm114in |
| Front track | 1,655mm65in | - |
| Rear track | 1,669mm66in | - |
| Ground clearance | 215mm8in | - |
| Trunk volume | 670L | 770L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,780L | 1,710L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 75L |
| CO2 emissions | 270g/km | 209g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Cayenne II Turbo S 4.8 V8: Power / Torque
- Porsche Cayenne III 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 2,250-4,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| PorscheCayenne III3.0 V6 | 5,300-6,400 rpm | 1,340-5,300 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8 | PorscheCayenne III3.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.3 s | 5.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.5 s | 6.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.4 s | 24.7 s |
| Top speed | 283 km/h 176 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.2 s | 9.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.6 s | 12.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.5 s | 14.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 187 km/h 116 mph | 161 km/h 100 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8 | 550 hp 410 kW |
| PorscheCayenne III3.0 V6 | 340 hp 254 kW |
Porsche Cayenne II Turbo S 4.8 V8 has 210 hp more than Porsche Cayenne III 3.0 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche Cayenne III 3.0 V6 and Porsche Cayenne II Turbo S 4.8 V8: 210 hp (157 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8 | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft |
| PorscheCayenne III3.0 V6 | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8 | 2,215 kg 4,883 lb |
| PorscheCayenne III3.0 V6 | 1,985 kg 4,376 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8 | 283 km/h 176 mph |
| PorscheCayenne III3.0 V6 | 245 km/h 152 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8 | 4.5 s |
| PorscheCayenne III3.0 V6 | 6.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche Cayenne II Turbo S 4.8 V8 and Porsche Cayenne III 3.0 V6: 1.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8 | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
| PorscheCayenne III3.0 V6 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche Cayenne III 3.0 V6 and Porsche Cayenne II Turbo S 4.8 V8: 2.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8 | 248 hp/t 185 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp |
| PorscheCayenne III3.0 V6 | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8 | 739 km 459 mi |
| PorscheCayenne III3.0 V6 | 815 km 507 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8 | 550 hp 410 kW | 4.5 s | 283 km/h 176 mph |
| PorscheCayenne III3.0 V6 | 340 hp 254 kW | 6.2 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| PorscheCayenne III3.0 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8 |
| 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| PorscheCayenne III3.0 V6 |
| 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche Cayenne II Turbo S 4.8 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8 | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | 4.5 s |
| PorscheCayenne III3.0 V6 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 6.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8 | 248 hp/t 185 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
| PorscheCayenne III3.0 V6 | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8 | PorscheCayenne III3.0 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 550 hp 410 kW | 340 hp 254 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.5 s | 6.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 283 km/h 176 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,215 kg 4,883 lb | 1,985 kg 4,376 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 739 km 459 mi | 815 km 507 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 270 g/km | 209 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 670 L 23.7 cu ft | 770 L 27.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 248 hp/t 185 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Cayenne II Turbo S 4.8 V8 | Porsche Cayenne III 3.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK | 9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.13 LC100 km | 16.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.39 LC100 mi | 25.91 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,725 L456 US gal379 UK gal | 1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,019 LC/year | 2,415 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Cayenne II Turbo S 4.8 V8
- Has 210 hp more
- Has 300 Nm more
- Is 1.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 38 km/h (24 mph) higher top speed
- Has 77 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Porsche Cayenne III 3.0 V6
- Is 230 kg lighter
- Uses 2.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 76 km (47 mi) more estimated range
- Has 100 L more trunk volume
- Emits 61 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























