Porsche Cayenne II
Car comparison
Porsche Cayenne II Turbo S 4.8 V8vsMercedes-Benz M-class (W166) AMG ML 63 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz M-class (W166)
AMG ML 63 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche Cayenne II Turbo S 4.8 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.5 s
- Fastest top speed283 km/h176 mph
- Most powerful550 hp410 kW
- Highest torque750 Nm553 lb-ft
- Lightest2,215 kg4,883 lb
- Best power-to-weight248 hp/t185 kW/t4.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.4 L/100 km28.0 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions270 g/km
- Best overall score86/100
- Best performance score84/100
- Best economy score76/100
Mercedes-Benz M-class (W166) AMG ML 63 V8
- Lowest city consumption15.7 L/100 km15.0 mpg US18.0 mpg UK
- Best estimated range788 km490 mi
- Largest trunk690 L
- Best practicality score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8 | Mercedes-BenzM-class (W166)AMG ML 63 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 550hp410kW | 523hp390kW |
| Torque | 750Nm553lb-ft | 700Nm516lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,215kg4,883lb | 2,345kg5,170lb |
| Gross weight | 2,880kg6,349lb | 3,050kg6,724lb |
| Top speed | 283 km/h 176 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 63.6s99% target: 280 km/h / 174 mph Calculated | 68.5s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.5s | 4.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.4s Calculated | 17.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.3s Calculated | 4.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.8L/100 km14.9mpg US17.9mpg UK | 15.7L/100 km15mpg US18.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.5s Calculated | 13.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 248hp/t185kW/t113hp/1000 lb Calculated | 223hp/t166kW/t101hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 339Nm/t227lb-ft/ton Calculated | 299Nm/t200lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 739km459mi Calculated | 788km490mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,806cc293cu in | 5,461cc333cu in |
| Length | 4,846mm191in | 4,804mm189in |
| Width | 1,939mm76in | 1,926mm76in |
| Height | 1,705mm67in | 1,796mm71in |
| Wheelbase | 2,895mm114in | 2,915mm115in |
| Front track | 1,655mm65in | 1,648mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,669mm66in | 1,663mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 215mm8in | - |
| Trunk volume | 670L | 690L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,780L | 2,010L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 93L |
| CO2 emissions | 270g/km | 276g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Cayenne II Turbo S 4.8 V8: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz M-class (W166) AMG ML 63 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 2,250-4,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzM-class (W166)AMG ML 63 V8 | 5,250-5,750 rpm | 1,750-5,000 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8 | Mercedes-BenzM-class (W166)AMG ML 63 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.3 s | 4.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.5 s | 4.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.4 s | 17.7 s |
| Top speed | 283 km/h 176 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.2 s | 8.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.6 s | 10.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.5 s | 13.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 187 km/h 116 mph | 176 km/h 109 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8 | 550 hp 410 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzM-class (W166)AMG ML 63 V8 | 523 hp 390 kW |
Porsche Cayenne II Turbo S 4.8 V8 has 27 hp more than Mercedes-Benz M-class (W166) AMG ML 63 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz M-class (W166) AMG ML 63 V8 and Porsche Cayenne II Turbo S 4.8 V8: 27 hp (20 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8 | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzM-class (W166)AMG ML 63 V8 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8 | 2,215 kg 4,883 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzM-class (W166)AMG ML 63 V8 | 2,345 kg 5,170 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8 | 283 km/h 176 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzM-class (W166)AMG ML 63 V8 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8 | 4.5 s |
| Mercedes-BenzM-class (W166)AMG ML 63 V8 | 4.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche Cayenne II Turbo S 4.8 V8 and Mercedes-Benz M-class (W166) AMG ML 63 V8: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8 | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzM-class (W166)AMG ML 63 V8 | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8 | 248 hp/t 185 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzM-class (W166)AMG ML 63 V8 | 223 hp/t 166 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8 | 739 km 459 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzM-class (W166)AMG ML 63 V8 | 788 km 490 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8 | 550 hp 410 kW | 4.5 s | 283 km/h 176 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzM-class (W166)AMG ML 63 V8 | 523 hp 390 kW | 4.8 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzM-class (W166)AMG ML 63 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8 |
| 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzM-class (W166)AMG ML 63 V8 |
| 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche Cayenne II Turbo S 4.8 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8 | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | 4.5 s |
| Mercedes-BenzM-class (W166)AMG ML 63 V8 | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | 4.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8 | 248 hp/t 185 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzM-class (W166)AMG ML 63 V8 | 223 hp/t 166 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8 | Mercedes-BenzM-class (W166)AMG ML 63 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 550 hp 410 kW | 523 hp 390 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.5 s | 4.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 283 km/h 176 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,215 kg 4,883 lb | 2,345 kg 5,170 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 739 km 459 mi | 788 km 490 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 270 g/km | 276 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 670 L 23.7 cu ft | 690 L 24.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 248 hp/t 185 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 223 hp/t 166 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Cayenne II Turbo S 4.8 V8 | Mercedes-Benz M-class (W166) AMG ML 63 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK | 11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.13 LC100 km | 20.65 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.39 LC100 mi | 33.23 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,725 L456 US gal379 UK gal | 1,770 L468 US gal389 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,019 LC/year | 3,098 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Cayenne II Turbo S 4.8 V8
- Has 27 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 130 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 23 km/h (14 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 25 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 6 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz M-class (W166) AMG ML 63 V8
- Has 49 km (30 mi) more estimated range
- Has 20 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























