Porsche Boxster (987) · Facelift 2009
Car comparison
Porsche Boxster (987) · Facelift 2009 2.9vsPorsche Boxster (986) S 3.2
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPorsche Boxster (986)
S 3.2
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche Boxster (987) Facelift 2009 2.9
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.8 s
- Fastest top speed261 km/h162 mph
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31.0 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.6 L/100 km17.3 mpg US20.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range714 km444 mi
- Best performance score62/100
- Best economy score82/100
Porsche Boxster (986) S 3.2
- Most powerful260 hp194 kW
- Highest torque310 Nm229 lb-ft
- Lightest1,360 kg2,998 lb
- Best power-to-weight191 hp/t143 kW/t5.2 kg/hp
- Largest trunk260 L
- Best overall score51/100
- Best practicality score31/100
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 20092.9 | PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 255hp190kW | 260hp194kW |
| Torque | 290Nm214lb-ft | 310Nm229lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,365kg3,009lb | 1,360kg2,998lb |
| Gross weight | 1,670kg3,682lb | 1,670kg3,682lb |
| Top speed | 261 km/h 162 mph | 258 km/h 160 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 89.6s99% target: 258 km/h / 161 mph Calculated | 79.6s99% target: 255 km/h / 159 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.8s | 6.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.1s | 22.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.5s Calculated | 6.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK | 11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.6L/100 km17.3mpg US20.8mpg UK | 16.4L/100 km14.3mpg US17.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.9s Calculated | 14.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 187hp/t139kW/t85hp/1000 lb Calculated | 191hp/t143kW/t87hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 212Nm/t142lb-ft/ton Calculated | 228Nm/t153lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 714km444mi Calculated | 577km358mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,893cc177cu in | 3,179cc194cu in |
| Length | 4,342mm171in | 4,320mm170in |
| Width | 1,801mm71in | 1,780mm70in |
| Height | 1,292mm51in | 1,290mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,415mm95in | 2,415mm95in |
| Front track | 1,490mm59in | 1,455mm57in |
| Rear track | 1,534mm60in | 1,514mm60in |
| Ground clearance | 127mm5in | 121mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 130L | 260L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 64L |
| CO2 emissions | 214g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Boxster (987) Facelift 2009 2.9: Power / Torque
- Porsche Boxster (986) S 3.2: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 20092.9 | 7,200 rpm | 4,400-6,000 rpm | 7,500 rpm |
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 6,200 rpm | 4,600 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 20092.9 | PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.5 s | 6.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.8 s | 6.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.1 s | 22.4 s |
| Top speed | 261 km/h 162 mph | 258 km/h 160 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.7 s | 12.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.9 s | 14.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 165 km/h 102 mph | 164 km/h 102 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 20092.9 | 255 hp 190 kW |
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 260 hp 194 kW |
Porsche Boxster (986) S 3.2 has 5 hp more than Porsche Boxster (987) Facelift 2009 2.9.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche Boxster (987) Facelift 2009 2.9 and Porsche Boxster (986) S 3.2: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 20092.9 | 290 Nm 214 lb-ft |
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 20092.9 | 1,365 kg 3,009 lb |
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 20092.9 | 261 km/h 162 mph |
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 258 km/h 160 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 20092.9 | 5.8 s |
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 6.4 s |
Although Porsche Boxster (986) S 3.2 has more power, Porsche Boxster (987) Facelift 2009 2.9 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche Boxster (987) Facelift 2009 2.9 and Porsche Boxster (986) S 3.2: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 20092.9 | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche Boxster (987) Facelift 2009 2.9 and Porsche Boxster (986) S 3.2: 2.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 20092.9 | 187 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp |
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 191 hp/t 143 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 20092.9 | 714 km 444 mi |
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 577 km 358 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 20092.9 | 255 hp 190 kW | 5.8 s | 261 km/h 162 mph |
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 260 hp 194 kW | 6.4 s | 258 km/h 160 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 20092.9 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 20092.9 |
| 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 |
| 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche Boxster (987) Facelift 2009 2.9 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 20092.9 | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | 5.8 s |
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | 6.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 20092.9 | 187 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 191 hp/t 143 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 20092.9 | PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 255 hp 190 kW | 260 hp 194 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 290 Nm 214 lb-ft | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.8 s | 6.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 261 km/h 162 mph | 258 km/h 160 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,365 kg 3,009 lb | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 714 km 444 mi | 577 km 358 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 214 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 130 L 4.6 cu ft | 260 L 9.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 187 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 191 hp/t 143 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Boxster (987) Facelift 2009 2.9 | Porsche Boxster (986) S 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31 mpg UK | 11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.92 LC100 km | 19.43 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.63 LC100 mi | 31.26 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,365 L361 US gal300 UK gal | 1,665 L440 US gal366 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,389 LC/year | 2,914 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Boxster (987) Facelift 2009 2.9
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 138 km (86 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Porsche Boxster (986) S 3.2
- Has 5 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 5 kg lighter
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 130 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























