Porsche 911 Targa (991)
Car comparison
Porsche 911 Targa (991) 4S 3.8vsPorsche 911 Cabriolet (991) Carrera 4S 3.8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPorsche 911 Cabriolet (991)
Carrera 4S 3.8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche 911 Cabriolet (991) Carrera 4S 3.8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.3 s
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption12.5 L/100 km18.8 mpg US22.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions214 g/km
- Best estimated range739 km459 mi
- Best performance score78/100
- Best economy score82/100
Porsche 911 Targa (991) 4S 3.8
- Fastest top speed296 km/h184 mph
- Most powerful400 hp298 kW
- Highest torque440 Nm325 lb-ft
- Lightest1,555 kg3,428 lb
- Best power-to-weight257 hp/t192 kW/t3.9 kg/hp
- Largest trunk285 L
- Best overall score69/100
- Best practicality score51/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Porsche911 Targa (991)4S 3.8 | Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Carrera 4S 3.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 400hp298kW | 400hp298kW |
| Torque | 440Nm325lb-ft | 440Nm325lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,555kg3,428lb | 1,555kg3,428lb |
| Gross weight | 1,960kg4,321lb | 1,955kg4,310lb |
| Top speed | 296 km/h 184 mph | 294 km/h 183 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 64.9s99% target: 293 km/h / 182 mph Calculated | 61.4s99% target: 291 km/h / 181 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.8s | 4.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.2s Calculated | 13.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.6s Calculated | 4.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.9L/100 km16.9mpg US20.3mpg UK | 12.5L/100 km18.8mpg US22.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.7s Calculated | 12.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 257hp/t192kW/t117hp/1000 lb Calculated | 257hp/t192kW/t117hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 283Nm/t189lb-ft/ton Calculated | 283Nm/t189lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 680km423mi Calculated | 739km459mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,800cc232cu in | 3,800cc232cu in |
| Length | 4,491mm177in | 4,491mm177in |
| Width | 1,852mm73in | 1,852mm73in |
| Height | 1,291mm51in | 1,293mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,450mm96in | 2,450mm96in |
| Front track | 1,538mm61in | 1,538mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,552mm61in | 1,552mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 285L | 285L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 68L | 68L |
| CO2 emissions | 237g/km | 214g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche 911 Targa (991) 4S 3.8: Power / Torque
- Porsche 911 Cabriolet (991) Carrera 4S 3.8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 Targa (991)4S 3.8 | 7,400 rpm | 5,600 rpm | 7,650 rpm |
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Carrera 4S 3.8 | 7,400 rpm | 5,600 rpm | 7,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Porsche911 Targa (991)4S 3.8 | Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Carrera 4S 3.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.6 s | 4.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.8 s | 4.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.2 s | 13.1 s |
| Top speed | 296 km/h 184 mph | 294 km/h 183 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 5.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.4 s | 8.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.8 s | 10.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.7 s | 12.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 189 km/h 117 mph | 193 km/h 120 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Targa (991)4S 3.8 | 400 hp 298 kW |
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Carrera 4S 3.8 | 400 hp 298 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Targa (991)4S 3.8 | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft |
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Carrera 4S 3.8 | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Targa (991)4S 3.8 | 1,555 kg 3,428 lb |
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Carrera 4S 3.8 | 1,555 kg 3,428 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Targa (991)4S 3.8 | 296 km/h 184 mph |
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Carrera 4S 3.8 | 294 km/h 183 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Targa (991)4S 3.8 | 4.8 s |
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Carrera 4S 3.8 | 4.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche 911 Cabriolet (991) Carrera 4S 3.8 and Porsche 911 Targa (991) 4S 3.8: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Targa (991)4S 3.8 | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK |
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Carrera 4S 3.8 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche 911 Cabriolet (991) Carrera 4S 3.8 and Porsche 911 Targa (991) 4S 3.8: 0.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Targa (991)4S 3.8 | 257 hp/t 192 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Carrera 4S 3.8 | 257 hp/t 192 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Targa (991)4S 3.8 | 680 km 423 mi |
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Carrera 4S 3.8 | 739 km 459 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 Targa (991)4S 3.8 | 400 hp 298 kW | 4.8 s | 296 km/h 184 mph |
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Carrera 4S 3.8 | 400 hp 298 kW | 4.3 s | 294 km/h 183 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 Targa (991)4S 3.8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Carrera 4S 3.8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 Targa (991)4S 3.8 |
| 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Carrera 4S 3.8 |
| 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche 911 Cabriolet (991) Carrera 4S 3.8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 Targa (991)4S 3.8 | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK | 4.8 s |
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Carrera 4S 3.8 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 4.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 Targa (991)4S 3.8 | 257 hp/t 192 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK |
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Carrera 4S 3.8 | 257 hp/t 192 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Porsche911 Targa (991)4S 3.8 | Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Carrera 4S 3.8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 400 hp 298 kW | 400 hp 298 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.8 s | 4.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 296 km/h 184 mph | 294 km/h 183 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,555 kg 3,428 lb | 1,555 kg 3,428 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 680 km 423 mi | 739 km 459 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 237 g/km | 214 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 285 L 10.1 cu ft | 285 L 10.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 257 hp/t 192 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 257 hp/t 192 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche 911 Targa (991) 4S 3.8 | Porsche 911 Cabriolet (991) Carrera 4S 3.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10 L/100 km23.5 mpg US28.2 mpg UK | 9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.50 LC100 km | 16.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.16 LC100 mi | 25.91 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,500 L396 US gal330 UK gal | 1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,625 LC/year | 2,415 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche 911 Targa (991) 4S 3.8
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
Porsche 911 Cabriolet (991) Carrera 4S 3.8
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 59 km (37 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 23 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























