Porsche 911 Targa (991)
Car comparison
Porsche 911 Targa (991) 4S 3.8vsPorsche 911 (991 II) Carrera 3.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPorsche 911 (991 II)
Carrera 3.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera 3.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.6 s
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lightest1,430 kg3,153 lb
- Best power-to-weight259 hp/t193 kW/t3.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34.0 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.7 L/100 km20.1 mpg US24.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions190 g/km
- Best estimated range771 km479 mi
- Best economy score85/100
Porsche 911 Targa (991) 4S 3.8
- Fastest top speed296 km/h184 mph
- Most powerful400 hp298 kW
- Largest trunk285 L
- Best overall score69/100
- Best performance score77/100
- Best practicality score51/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Porsche911 Targa (991)4S 3.8 | Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 400hp298kW | 370hp276kW |
| Torque | 440Nm325lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,555kg3,428lb | 1,430kg3,153lb |
| Gross weight | 1,960kg4,321lb | 1,875kg4,134lb |
| Top speed | 296 km/h 184 mph | 295 km/h 183 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 64.9s99% target: 293 km/h / 182 mph Calculated | 63.9s99% target: 292 km/h / 181 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.8s | 4.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.2s Calculated | 13.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.6s Calculated | 4.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.9L/100 km16.9mpg US20.3mpg UK | 11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.7s Calculated | 12.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 257hp/t192kW/t117hp/1000 lb Calculated | 259hp/t193kW/t117hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 283Nm/t189lb-ft/ton Calculated | 315Nm/t211lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 680km423mi Calculated | 771km479mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,800cc232cu in | 2,981cc182cu in |
| Length | 4,491mm177in | 4,499mm177in |
| Width | 1,852mm73in | 1,808mm71in |
| Height | 1,291mm51in | 1,294mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,450mm96in | 2,450mm96in |
| Front track | 1,538mm61in | - |
| Rear track | 1,552mm61in | - |
| Trunk volume | 285L | 145L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 68L | 64L |
| CO2 emissions | 237g/km | 190g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche 911 Targa (991) 4S 3.8: Power / Torque
- Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera 3.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 Targa (991)4S 3.8 | 7,400 rpm | 5,600 rpm | 7,650 rpm |
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera 3.0 | 6,500 rpm | 1,700-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Porsche911 Targa (991)4S 3.8 | Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.6 s | 4.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.8 s | 4.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.2 s | 13.8 s |
| Top speed | 296 km/h 184 mph | 295 km/h 183 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.4 s | 8.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.8 s | 10.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.7 s | 12.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 189 km/h 117 mph | 190 km/h 118 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Targa (991)4S 3.8 | 400 hp 298 kW |
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera 3.0 | 370 hp 276 kW |
Porsche 911 Targa (991) 4S 3.8 has 30 hp more than Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera 3.0.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera 3.0 and Porsche 911 Targa (991) 4S 3.8: 30 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Targa (991)4S 3.8 | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft |
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera 3.0 | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Targa (991)4S 3.8 | 1,555 kg 3,428 lb |
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera 3.0 | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Targa (991)4S 3.8 | 296 km/h 184 mph |
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera 3.0 | 295 km/h 183 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Targa (991)4S 3.8 | 4.8 s |
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera 3.0 | 4.6 s |
Although Porsche 911 Targa (991) 4S 3.8 has more power, Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera 3.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera 3.0 and Porsche 911 Targa (991) 4S 3.8: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Targa (991)4S 3.8 | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK |
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera 3.0 | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera 3.0 and Porsche 911 Targa (991) 4S 3.8: 1.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Targa (991)4S 3.8 | 257 hp/t 192 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera 3.0 | 259 hp/t 193 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Targa (991)4S 3.8 | 680 km 423 mi |
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera 3.0 | 771 km 479 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 Targa (991)4S 3.8 | 400 hp 298 kW | 4.8 s | 296 km/h 184 mph |
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera 3.0 | 370 hp 276 kW | 4.6 s | 295 km/h 183 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 Targa (991)4S 3.8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera 3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 Targa (991)4S 3.8 |
| 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera 3.0 |
| 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera 3.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 Targa (991)4S 3.8 | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK | 4.8 s |
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera 3.0 | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 Targa (991)4S 3.8 | 257 hp/t 192 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK |
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera 3.0 | 259 hp/t 193 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Porsche911 Targa (991)4S 3.8 | Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera 3.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 400 hp 298 kW | 370 hp 276 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.8 s | 4.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 296 km/h 184 mph | 295 km/h 183 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,555 kg 3,428 lb | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 680 km 423 mi | 771 km 479 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 237 g/km | 190 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 285 L 10.1 cu ft | 145 L 5.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 257 hp/t 192 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 259 hp/t 193 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche 911 Targa (991) 4S 3.8 | Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10 L/100 km23.5 mpg US28.2 mpg UK | 8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.50 LC100 km | 14.53 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.16 LC100 mi | 23.38 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,500 L396 US gal330 UK gal | 1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,625 LC/year | 2,179 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche 911 Targa (991) 4S 3.8
- Has 30 hp more
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 140 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera 3.0
- Has 10 Nm more
- Is 125 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 91 km (57 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 47 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























