Porsche 911 (992)
Car comparison
Porsche 911 (992) Carrera T 3.0vsPorsche 911 Cabriolet (992) Carrera 4 3.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPorsche 911 Cabriolet (992)
Carrera 4 3.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche 911 (992) Carrera T 3.0
- Fastest top speed291 km/h181 mph
- Most powerful385 hp287 kW
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lightest1,470 kg3,241 lb
- Best power-to-weight262 hp/t195 kW/t3.8 kg/hp
- Largest trunk132 L
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score77/100
- Best practicality score41/100
Porsche 911 Cabriolet (992) Carrera 4 3.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.4 s
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.2 L/100 km17.8 mpg US21.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range728 km453 mi
- Best economy score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 | Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Carrera 4 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 385hp287kW | 385hp287kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,470kg3,241lb | 1,625kg3,583lb |
| Gross weight | 1,850kg4,079lb | 2,040kg4,497lb |
| Top speed | 291 km/h 181 mph | 289 km/h 180 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 77.9s99% target: 288 km/h / 179 mph Calculated | 84.7s99% target: 286 km/h / 178 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.5s | 4.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.1s | 15.6s |
| 0-60 mph | 4.3s Calculated | 4.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15L/100 km15.7mpg US18.8mpg UK | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.6s Calculated | 12.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 262hp/t195kW/t119hp/1000 lb Calculated | 237hp/t177kW/t107hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 306Nm/t205lb-ft/ton Calculated | 277Nm/t185lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 627km390mi Calculated | 728km453mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,981cc182cu in | 2,981cc182cu in |
| Length | 4,530mm178in | 4,519mm178in |
| Width | 1,852mm73in | 1,852mm73in |
| Height | 1,293mm51in | 1,297mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,450mm96in | 2,450mm96in |
| Front track | - | 1,591mm63in |
| Rear track | - | 1,557mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 115mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 132L | 132L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 67L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 211g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche 911 (992) Carrera T 3.0: Power / Torque
- Porsche 911 Cabriolet (992) Carrera 4 3.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 | 6,500 rpm | 1,950-5,000 rpm | 7,500 rpm |
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Carrera 4 3.0 | 6,500 rpm | 1,950-5,000 rpm | 7,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 | Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Carrera 4 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.3 s | 4.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.5 s | 4.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.1 s | 15.6 s |
| Top speed | 291 km/h 181 mph | 289 km/h 180 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 5.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.2 s | 8.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.6 s | 10.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.6 s | 12.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 184 km/h 114 mph | 181 km/h 113 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 | 385 hp 287 kW |
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Carrera 4 3.0 | 385 hp 287 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Carrera 4 3.0 | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb |
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Carrera 4 3.0 | 1,625 kg 3,583 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 | 291 km/h 181 mph |
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Carrera 4 3.0 | 289 km/h 180 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 | 4.5 s |
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Carrera 4 3.0 | 4.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche 911 Cabriolet (992) Carrera 4 3.0 and Porsche 911 (992) Carrera T 3.0: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Carrera 4 3.0 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche 911 Cabriolet (992) Carrera 4 3.0 and Porsche 911 (992) Carrera T 3.0: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 | 262 hp/t 195 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp |
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Carrera 4 3.0 | 237 hp/t 177 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 | 627 km 390 mi |
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Carrera 4 3.0 | 728 km 453 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 | 385 hp 287 kW | 4.5 s | 291 km/h 181 mph |
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Carrera 4 3.0 | 385 hp 287 kW | 4.4 s | 289 km/h 180 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Carrera 4 3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 |
| 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Carrera 4 3.0 |
| 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche 911 Cabriolet (992) Carrera 4 3.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | 4.5 s |
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Carrera 4 3.0 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 4.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 | 262 hp/t 195 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Carrera 4 3.0 | 237 hp/t 177 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 | Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Carrera 4 3.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 385 hp 287 kW | 385 hp 287 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.5 s | 4.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 291 km/h 181 mph | 289 km/h 180 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb | 1,625 kg 3,583 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 627 km 390 mi | 728 km 453 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 211 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 132 L 4.7 cu ft | 132 L 4.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 262 hp/t 195 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 237 hp/t 177 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche 911 (992) Carrera T 3.0 | Porsche 911 Cabriolet (992) Carrera 4 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK | 9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.85 LC100 km | 16.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.73 LC100 mi | 25.91 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,530 L404 US gal337 UK gal | 1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,678 LC/year | 2,415 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche 911 (992) Carrera T 3.0
- Is 155 kg lighter
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 25 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Porsche 911 Cabriolet (992) Carrera 4 3.0
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 101 km (63 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























