Porsche 911 (992)
Car comparison
Porsche 911 (992) Carrera 4 3.0vsPorsche 718 Cayman (982) S 2.5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPorsche 718 Cayman (982)
S 2.5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) S 2.5
- Lightest1,385 kg3,053 lb
- Best power-to-weight253 hp/t188 kW/t4.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.5 L/100 km24.8 mpg US29.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions167 g/km
- Best estimated range877 km545 mi
- Largest trunk334 L
- Best economy score87/100
Porsche 911 (992) Carrera 4 3.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.2 s
- Fastest top speed291 km/h181 mph
- Most powerful385 hp287 kW
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score78/100
- Best practicality score41/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Porsche911 (992)Carrera 4 3.0 | Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 385hp287kW | 350hp261kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 420Nm310lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,555kg3,428lb | 1,385kg3,053lb |
| Gross weight | 1,985kg4,376lb | 1,695kg3,737lb |
| Top speed | 291 km/h 181 mph | 285 km/h 177 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 82.9s99% target: 288 km/h / 179 mph Calculated | 73.7s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.2s | 4.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.9s | 15.0s |
| 0-60 mph | 4.0s Calculated | 4.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.3s Calculated | 12.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 248hp/t185kW/t112hp/1000 lb Calculated | 253hp/t188kW/t115hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 289Nm/t194lb-ft/ton Calculated | 303Nm/t203lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 728km453mi Calculated | 877km545mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,981cc182cu in | 2,497cc152cu in |
| Length | 4,519mm178in | 4,379mm172in |
| Width | 1,852mm73in | 1,801mm71in |
| Height | 1,298mm51in | 1,284mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,450mm96in | 2,475mm97in |
| Front track | 1,591mm63in | 1,515mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,557mm61in | 1,540mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 132L | 334L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 67L | 64L |
| CO2 emissions | 210g/km | 167g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche 911 (992) Carrera 4 3.0: Power / Torque
- Porsche 718 Cayman (982) S 2.5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera 4 3.0 | 6,500 rpm | 1,950-5,000 rpm | 7,500 rpm |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | 6,500 rpm | 1,900-4,500 rpm | 7,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Porsche911 (992)Carrera 4 3.0 | Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.0 s | 4.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.2 s | 4.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.9 s | 15.0 s |
| Top speed | 291 km/h 181 mph | 285 km/h 177 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.9 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.3 s | 5.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.0 s | 8.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.4 s | 10.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.3 s | 12.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 184 km/h 114 mph | 184 km/h 114 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera 4 3.0 | 385 hp 287 kW |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | 350 hp 261 kW |
Porsche 911 (992) Carrera 4 3.0 has 35 hp more than Porsche 718 Cayman (982) S 2.5.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche 718 Cayman (982) S 2.5 and Porsche 911 (992) Carrera 4 3.0: 35 hp (26 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera 4 3.0 | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera 4 3.0 | 1,555 kg 3,428 lb |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | 1,385 kg 3,053 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera 4 3.0 | 291 km/h 181 mph |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | 285 km/h 177 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera 4 3.0 | 4.2 s |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | 4.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche 911 (992) Carrera 4 3.0 and Porsche 718 Cayman (982) S 2.5: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera 4 3.0 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche 718 Cayman (982) S 2.5 and Porsche 911 (992) Carrera 4 3.0: 1.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera 4 3.0 | 248 hp/t 185 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | 253 hp/t 188 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera 4 3.0 | 728 km 453 mi |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | 877 km 545 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera 4 3.0 | 385 hp 287 kW | 4.2 s | 291 km/h 181 mph |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | 350 hp 261 kW | 4.4 s | 285 km/h 177 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera 4 3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera 4 3.0 |
| 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 |
| 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) S 2.5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera 4 3.0 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 4.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera 4 3.0 | 248 hp/t 185 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | 253 hp/t 188 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Porsche911 (992)Carrera 4 3.0 | Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 385 hp 287 kW | 350 hp 261 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.2 s | 4.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 291 km/h 181 mph | 285 km/h 177 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,555 kg 3,428 lb | 1,385 kg 3,053 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 728 km 453 mi | 877 km 545 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 210 g/km | 167 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 132 L 4.7 cu ft | 334 L 11.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 248 hp/t 185 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 253 hp/t 188 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche 911 (992) Carrera 4 3.0 | Porsche 718 Cayman (982) S 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK | 7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.10 LC100 km | 12.78 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.91 LC100 mi | 20.56 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal | 1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,415 LC/year | 1,916 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche 911 (992) Carrera 4 3.0
- Has 35 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) S 2.5
- Is 170 kg lighter
- Uses 1.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 148 km (92 mi) more estimated range
- Has 202 L more trunk volume
- Emits 43 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























