Porsche 911 (991 II)
Car comparison
Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera T 3.0vsPorsche 911 (992) Carrera 4 3.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPorsche 911 (992)
Carrera 4 3.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera T 3.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.2 s
- Fastest top speed291 km/h181 mph
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lightest1,445 kg3,186 lb
- Best power-to-weight256 hp/t191 kW/t3.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions193 g/km
- Best estimated range753 km468 mi
- Largest trunk145 L
- Best economy score84/100
- Best practicality score41/100
Porsche 911 (992) Carrera 4 3.0
- Most powerful385 hp287 kW
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score78/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 | Porsche911 (992)Carrera 4 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 370hp276kW | 385hp287kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,445kg3,186lb | 1,555kg3,428lb |
| Gross weight | 1,890kg4,167lb | 1,985kg4,376lb |
| Top speed | 291 km/h 181 mph | 291 km/h 181 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 58.9s99% target: 288 km/h / 179 mph Calculated | 82.9s99% target: 288 km/h / 179 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.2s | 4.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.9s Calculated | 14.9s |
| 0-60 mph | 4.0s Calculated | 4.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.1s Calculated | 12.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 256hp/t191kW/t116hp/1000 lb Calculated | 248hp/t185kW/t112hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 311Nm/t208lb-ft/ton Calculated | 289Nm/t194lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 753km468mi Calculated | 728km453mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,981cc182cu in | 2,981cc182cu in |
| Length | 4,527mm178in | 4,519mm178in |
| Width | 1,808mm71in | 1,852mm73in |
| Height | 1,285mm51in | 1,298mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,450mm96in | 2,450mm96in |
| Front track | - | 1,591mm63in |
| Rear track | - | 1,557mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 145L | 132L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 67L |
| CO2 emissions | 193g/km | 210g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera T 3.0: Power / Torque
- Porsche 911 (992) Carrera 4 3.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 | 6,500 rpm | 1,700-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera 4 3.0 | 6,500 rpm | 1,950-5,000 rpm | 7,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 | Porsche911 (992)Carrera 4 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.0 s | 4.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.2 s | 4.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.9 s | 14.9 s |
| Top speed | 291 km/h 181 mph | 291 km/h 181 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 1.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 5.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.0 s | 8.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.2 s | 10.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.1 s | 12.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 194 km/h 121 mph | 184 km/h 114 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 | 370 hp 276 kW |
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera 4 3.0 | 385 hp 287 kW |
Porsche 911 (992) Carrera 4 3.0 has 15 hp more than Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera T 3.0.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera T 3.0 and Porsche 911 (992) Carrera 4 3.0: 15 hp (11 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera 4 3.0 | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 | 1,445 kg 3,186 lb |
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera 4 3.0 | 1,555 kg 3,428 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 | 291 km/h 181 mph |
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera 4 3.0 | 291 km/h 181 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 | 4.2 s |
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera 4 3.0 | 4.2 s |
Although Porsche 911 (992) Carrera 4 3.0 has more power, Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera T 3.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera 4 3.0 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera T 3.0 and Porsche 911 (992) Carrera 4 3.0: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 | 256 hp/t 191 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera 4 3.0 | 248 hp/t 185 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 | 753 km 468 mi |
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera 4 3.0 | 728 km 453 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 | 370 hp 276 kW | 4.2 s | 291 km/h 181 mph |
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera 4 3.0 | 385 hp 287 kW | 4.2 s | 291 km/h 181 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera 4 3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 |
| 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera 4 3.0 |
| 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera T 3.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera 4 3.0 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 | 256 hp/t 191 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera 4 3.0 | 248 hp/t 185 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 | Porsche911 (992)Carrera 4 3.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 370 hp 276 kW | 385 hp 287 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.2 s | 4.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 291 km/h 181 mph | 291 km/h 181 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,445 kg 3,186 lb | 1,555 kg 3,428 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 753 km 468 mi | 728 km 453 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 193 g/km | 210 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 145 L 5.1 cu ft | 132 L 4.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 256 hp/t 191 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 248 hp/t 185 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera T 3.0 | Porsche 911 (992) Carrera 4 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK | 9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.88 LC100 km | 16.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.94 LC100 mi | 25.91 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,275 L337 US gal280 UK gal | 1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,231 LC/year | 2,415 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera T 3.0
- Is 110 kg lighter
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 25 km (15 mi) more estimated range
- Has 13 L more trunk volume
- Emits 17 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Porsche 911 (992) Carrera 4 3.0
- Has 15 hp more
Pros
- Most powerful
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























