Porsche 718 Cayman (982)
Car comparison
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) 2.0vsPorsche Cayman (981C) S 3.4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPorsche Cayman (981C)
S 3.4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche Cayman (981C) S 3.4
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.9 s
- Most powerful325 hp242 kW
- Best power-to-weight237 hp/t177 kW/t4.2 kg/hp
- Best estimated range780 km485 mi
- Largest trunk425 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score71/100
- Best practicality score42/100
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) 2.0
- Fastest top speed285 km/h177 mph Unrestricted275 km/h171 mph Restricted
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lightest1,335 kg2,943 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions168 g/km
- Best economy score87/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 | PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300hp224kW | 325hp242kW |
| Torque | 380Nm280lb-ft | 370Nm273lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,335kg2,943lb | 1,370kg3,020lb |
| Gross weight | 1,655kg3,649lb | 1,695kg3,737lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph Calculated | 281 km/h 175 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 96.1s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph Calculated | 65.6s99% target: 278 km/h / 173 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.1s | 4.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.3s | 15.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.8s Calculated | 4.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK | 11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.3s Calculated | 12.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 225hp/t168kW/t102hp/1000 lb Calculated | 237hp/t177kW/t108hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 285Nm/t190lb-ft/ton Calculated | 270Nm/t181lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 730km453mi Calculated | 780km485mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,988cc121cu in | 3,436cc210cu in |
| Length | 4,379mm172in | 4,380mm172in |
| Width | 1,801mm71in | 1,801mm71in |
| Height | 1,286mm51in | 1,295mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,475mm97in | 2,475mm97in |
| Front track | 1,515mm60in | - |
| Rear track | 1,532mm60in | - |
| Trunk volume | 334L | 425L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 54L | 64L |
| CO2 emissions | 168g/km | 190g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche 718 Cayman (982) 2.0: Power / Torque
- Porsche Cayman (981C) S 3.4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 | 6,500 rpm | 1,950-4,500 rpm | 7,500 rpm |
| PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 | 7,400 rpm | 4,500-5,800 rpm | 7,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 | PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.8 s | 4.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.1 s | 4.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.3 s | 15.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph Likely limited | 281 km/h 175 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 5.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.6 s | 8.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.1 s | 10.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.3 s | 12.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 173 km/h 107 mph | 183 km/h 114 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 | 300 hp 224 kW |
| PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 | 325 hp 242 kW |
Porsche Cayman (981C) S 3.4 has 25 hp more than Porsche 718 Cayman (982) 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche 718 Cayman (982) 2.0 and Porsche Cayman (981C) S 3.4: 25 hp (19 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
| PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 | 1,335 kg 2,943 lb |
| PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 | 1,370 kg 3,020 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph |
| PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 | 281 km/h 175 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 | 5.1 s |
| PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 | 4.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche Cayman (981C) S 3.4 and Porsche 718 Cayman (982) 2.0: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
| PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche 718 Cayman (982) 2.0 and Porsche Cayman (981C) S 3.4: 0.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 | 225 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
| PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 | 237 hp/t 177 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 | 730 km 453 mi |
| PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 | 780 km 485 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 | 300 hp 224 kW | 5.1 s | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph |
| PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 | 325 hp 242 kW | 4.9 s | 281 km/h 175 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 |
| 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 |
| 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche Cayman (981C) S 3.4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 5.1 s |
| PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 | 225 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
| PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 | 237 hp/t 177 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 | PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp 224 kW | 325 hp 242 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.1 s | 4.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph | 281 km/h 175 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,335 kg 2,943 lb | 1,370 kg 3,020 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 730 km 453 mi | 780 km 485 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 168 g/km | 190 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 334 L 11.8 cu ft | 425 L 15.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 225 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 237 hp/t 177 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche 718 Cayman (982) 2.0 | Porsche Cayman (981C) S 3.4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK | 8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.95 LC100 km | 14.35 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.84 LC100 mi | 23.09 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal | 1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,943 LC/year | 2,153 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) 2.0
- Has 10 Nm more
- Is 35 kg lighter
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Emits 22 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Porsche Cayman (981C) S 3.4
- Has 25 hp more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 51 km (32 mi) more estimated range
- Has 91 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























