Porsche 718 Cayman (982)
Car comparison
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) 2.0vsJaguar F-type Coupe · Facelift 2017 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar F-type Coupe · Facelift 2017
2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.1 s
- Fastest top speed285 km/h177 mph Unrestricted275 km/h171 mph Restricted
- Most powerful300 hp224 kW
- Lightest1,335 kg2,943 lb
- Best power-to-weight225 hp/t168 kW/t4.5 kg/hp
- Largest trunk334 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score70/100
- Best economy score87/100
- Best practicality score39/100
Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 2.0
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions163 g/km
- Best estimated range875 km544 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 | JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20172.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300hp224kW | 300hp224kW |
| Torque | 380Nm280lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,335kg2,943lb | 1,525kg3,362lb |
| Gross weight | 1,655kg3,649lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 96.1s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph Calculated | 77.7s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.1s | 5.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.3s | 19.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.8s Calculated | 5.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 13.3s Calculated | 13.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 225hp/t168kW/t102hp/1000 lb Calculated | 197hp/t147kW/t89hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 285Nm/t190lb-ft/ton Calculated | 262Nm/t176lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 730km453mi Calculated | 875km544mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,988cc121cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,379mm172in | 4,482mm176in |
| Width | 1,801mm71in | 1,923mm76in |
| Height | 1,286mm51in | 1,310mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,475mm97in | 2,622mm103in |
| Front track | 1,515mm60in | 1,597mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,532mm60in | 1,649mm65in |
| Trunk volume | 334L | 310L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 408L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 54L | 63L |
| CO2 emissions | 168g/km | 163g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche 718 Cayman (982) 2.0: Power / Torque
- Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 | 6,500 rpm | 1,950-4,500 rpm | 7,500 rpm |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20172.0 | 5,500 rpm | 1,500-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 | JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20172.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.8 s | 5.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.1 s | 5.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.3 s | 19.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.6 s | 9.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.1 s | 11.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.3 s | 13.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 173 km/h 107 mph | 170 km/h 105 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 | 300 hp 224 kW |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20172.0 | 300 hp 224 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20172.0 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 | 1,335 kg 2,943 lb |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20172.0 | 1,525 kg 3,362 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20172.0 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 | 5.1 s |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20172.0 | 5.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche 718 Cayman (982) 2.0 and Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 2.0: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20172.0 | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 | 225 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20172.0 | 197 hp/t 147 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 | 730 km 453 mi |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20172.0 | 875 km 544 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 | 300 hp 224 kW | 5.1 s | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20172.0 | 300 hp 224 kW | 5.7 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20172.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 |
| 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20172.0 |
| 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 5.1 s |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20172.0 | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 5.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 | 225 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20172.0 | 197 hp/t 147 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 | JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20172.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp 224 kW | 300 hp 224 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.1 s | 5.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,335 kg 2,943 lb | 1,525 kg 3,362 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 730 km 453 mi | 875 km 544 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 168 g/km | 163 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 334 L 11.8 cu ft | 310 L 10.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 225 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 197 hp/t 147 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche 718 Cayman (982) 2.0 | Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK | 7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.95 LC100 km | 12.60 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.84 LC100 mi | 20.28 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal | 1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,943 LC/year | 1,890 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) 2.0
- Is 190 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 28 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 24 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 2.0
- Has 20 Nm more
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 145 km (90 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 5 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























