Porsche 718 Cayman (982)
Car comparison
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) 2.0vsPorsche Cayman (981C) 2.7
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPorsche Cayman (981C)
2.7
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.9 s
- Fastest top speed285 km/h177 mph Unrestricted275 km/h171 mph Restricted
- Most powerful300 hp224 kW
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight220 hp/t164 kW/t4.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.0 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions158 g/km
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score70/100
- Best economy score88/100
Porsche Cayman (981C) 2.7
- Lightest1,360 kg2,998 lb
- Best estimated range810 km503 mi
- Largest trunk425 L
- Best practicality score42/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 | PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300hp224kW | 275hp205kW |
| Torque | 380Nm280lb-ft | 290Nm214lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,365kg3,009lb | 1,360kg2,998lb |
| Gross weight | 1,685kg3,715lb | 1,685kg3,715lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph Calculated | 264 km/h 164 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 98.7s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph Calculated | 71.9s99% target: 261 km/h / 162 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.9s | 5.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.1s | 19.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.6s Calculated | 5.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.1s Calculated | 13.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 220hp/t164kW/t100hp/1000 lb Calculated | 202hp/t151kW/t92hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 278Nm/t186lb-ft/ton Calculated | 213Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 783km486mi Calculated | 810km503mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,988cc121cu in | 2,706cc165cu in |
| Length | 4,379mm172in | 4,380mm172in |
| Width | 1,801mm71in | 1,801mm71in |
| Height | 1,286mm51in | 1,294mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,475mm97in | 2,475mm97in |
| Front track | 1,515mm60in | - |
| Rear track | 1,532mm60in | - |
| Trunk volume | 334L | 425L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 54L | 64L |
| CO2 emissions | 158g/km | 183g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche 718 Cayman (982) 2.0: Power / Torque
- Porsche Cayman (981C) 2.7: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 | 6,500 rpm | 1,950-4,500 rpm | 7,500 rpm |
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 7,400 rpm | 4,500-6,500 rpm | 7,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 | PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.6 s | 5.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.9 s | 5.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.1 s | 19.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph Likely limited | 264 km/h 164 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 9.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.0 s | 11.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.1 s | 13.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 173 km/h 108 mph | 172 km/h 107 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 | 300 hp 224 kW |
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 275 hp 205 kW |
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) 2.0 has 25 hp more than Porsche Cayman (981C) 2.7.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche Cayman (981C) 2.7 and Porsche 718 Cayman (982) 2.0: 25 hp (19 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 290 Nm 214 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 | 1,365 kg 3,009 lb |
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph |
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 264 km/h 164 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 | 4.9 s |
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 5.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche 718 Cayman (982) 2.0 and Porsche Cayman (981C) 2.7: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche 718 Cayman (982) 2.0 and Porsche Cayman (981C) 2.7: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 | 220 hp/t 164 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 202 hp/t 151 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 | 783 km 486 mi |
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 810 km 503 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 | 300 hp 224 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph |
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 275 hp 205 kW | 5.6 s | 264 km/h 164 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 |
| 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 |
| 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 5.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 | 220 hp/t 164 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 202 hp/t 151 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Porsche718 Cayman (982)2.0 | PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp 224 kW | 275 hp 205 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | 290 Nm 214 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.9 s | 5.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph | 264 km/h 164 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,365 kg 3,009 lb | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 783 km 486 mi | 810 km 503 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 158 g/km | 183 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 334 L 11.8 cu ft | 425 L 15.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 220 hp/t 164 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 202 hp/t 151 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche 718 Cayman (982) 2.0 | Porsche Cayman (981C) 2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.08 LC100 km | 13.83 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,811 LC/year | 2,074 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) 2.0
- Has 25 hp more
- Has 90 Nm more
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 21 km/h (13 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 25 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Porsche Cayman (981C) 2.7
- Is 5 kg lighter
- Has 28 km (17 mi) more estimated range
- Has 91 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























