Car comparison

Xiaomi SU7 Max 101 kWhvsPolestar 5 112 kWh

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Xiaomi SU7

Max 101 kWh

673 hpElectricAWDAutomaticSedan2023-2026
VS

Polestar 5

112 kWh

884 hpElectricAWDAutomaticSedan2025-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Xiaomi SU7 Max 101 kWh

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    2.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    265 km/h
    165 mph
  • Lightest
    2,205 kg
    4,861 lb
  • Largest trunk
    517 L
  • Best overall score
    85/100
  • Best performance score
    89/100
  • Best economy score
    0/100
  • Best practicality score
    76/100

Polestar 5 112 kWh

  • Most powerful
    884 hp
    659 kW
  • Highest torque
    1,015 Nm
    749 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    353 hp/t
    263 kW/t
    2.8 kg/hp

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelXiaomiSU7Max 101 kWhPolestar5112 kWh
Power
673hp502kW
884hp659kW
Torque
838Nm618lb-ft
1,015Nm749lb-ft
Curb weight
2,205kg4,861lb
2,503kg5,518lb
Gross weight
2,655kg5,853lb
-
Top speed
265 km/h
165 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
46.3s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
26.1s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
2.8s
3.2s
0-200 km/h
10.7s
8.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
2.6s
Calculated
3.1s
Calculated
Quarter mile
10.8s
Calculated
10.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
305hp/t228kW/t138hp/1000 lb
Calculated
353hp/t263kW/t160hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
380Nm/t254lb-ft/ton
Calculated
406Nm/t271lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Length
4,997mm197in
5,087mm200in
Width
1,963mm77in
-
Height
1,440mm57in
1,419mm56in
Wheelbase
3,000mm118in
3,054mm120in
Front track
1,693mm67in
1,716mm68in
Rear track
1,699mm67in
1,684mm66in
Ground clearance-
153mm6in
Trunk volume
517L
365L
Max trunk volume-
1,128L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
4

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricXiaomiSU7Max 101 kWhPolestar5112 kWh
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
2.6 s
3.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
2.8 s
3.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
10.7 s
8.7 s
Top speed
265 km/h
165 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.6 s
2.0 s
330 ft
101 m
4.5 s
4.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
6.9 s
7.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
9.0 s
9.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
10.8 s
10.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
201 km/h
125 mph
219 km/h
136 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
XiaomiSU7Max 101 kWh
673 hp
502 kW
Polestar5112 kWh
884 hp
659 kW

Polestar 5 112 kWh has 211 hp more than Xiaomi SU7 Max 101 kWh.

The biggest power difference is between Xiaomi SU7 Max 101 kWh and Polestar 5 112 kWh: 211 hp (157 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
XiaomiSU7Max 101 kWh
838 Nm
618 lb-ft
Polestar5112 kWh
1,015 Nm
749 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
XiaomiSU7Max 101 kWh
2,205 kg
4,861 lb
Polestar5112 kWh
2,503 kg
5,518 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
XiaomiSU7Max 101 kWh
265 km/h
165 mph
Polestar5112 kWh
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
XiaomiSU7Max 101 kWh2.8 s
Polestar5112 kWh3.2 s

Although Polestar 5 112 kWh has more power, Xiaomi SU7 Max 101 kWh is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Xiaomi SU7 Max 101 kWh and Polestar 5 112 kWh: 0.4 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
XiaomiSU7Max 101 kWh
305 hp/t
228 kW/t
3.3 kg/hp
Polestar5112 kWh
353 hp/t
263 kW/t
2.8 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
XiaomiSU7Max 101 kWh
673 hp
502 kW
2.8 s
265 km/h
165 mph
Polestar5112 kWh
884 hp
659 kW
3.2 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
XiaomiSU7Max 101 kWh
Power
673 hp
502 kW
0-100 km/h2.8 s
Top speed
265 km/h
165 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
517 L
18.3 cu ft
Length
4,997 mm
196.7 in
Height
1,440 mm
56.7 in
Polestar5112 kWh
Power
884 hp
659 kW
0-100 km/h3.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk
365 L
12.9 cu ft
Length
5,087 mm
200.3 in
Height
1,419 mm
55.9 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleXiaomiSU7Max 101 kWhPolestar5112 kWh
Power
673 hp
502 kW
884 hp
659 kW
Torque
838 Nm
618 lb-ft
1,015 Nm
749 lb-ft
Acceleration
2.8 s
3.2 s
Top speed
265 km/h
165 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
2,205 kg
4,861 lb
2,503 kg
5,518 lb
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
517 L
18.3 cu ft
Length
4,997 mm
196.7 in
Height
1,440 mm
56.7 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk
365 L
12.9 cu ft
Length
5,087 mm
200.3 in
Height
1,419 mm
55.9 in
Trunk score
517 L
18.3 cu ft
365 L
12.9 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
305 hp/t
228 kW/t
3.3 kg/hp
353 hp/t
263 kW/t
2.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Head-to-head comparisons

Xiaomi SU7 Max 101 kWh

  • Is 298 kg lighter
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 152 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power

Polestar 5 112 kWh

  • Has 211 hp more
  • Has 177 Nm more
  • Has 48 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Xiaomi SU7 Max 101 kWh
Polestar 5 112 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Max 101 kWh
M70 105.7 kWh
VS
XiaomiSU7Max 101 kWhvsBMWi7 (G70)M70 105.7 kWh
Max 101 kWh
112 kWh
VS
XiaomiSU7Max 101 kWhvsPolestar5112 kWh
112 kWh
AMG EQE 53 100 kWh
VS
Polestar5112 kWhvsMercedes-BenzEQE (V295)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh
112 kWh
Competition 4.4 V8
VS
Polestar5112 kWhvsBMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 2020Competition 4.4 V8
Max 101 kWh
S 680 V12
VS
XiaomiSU7Max 101 kWhvsMercedes-BenzMaybach S-class (Z223)S 680 V12
112 kWh
S 680 V8
VS
Polestar5112 kWhvsMercedes-BenzMaybach S-class (Z223)Facelift 2026S 680 V8
112 kWh
Competition 3.0
VS
Polestar5112 kWhvsBMWM3 (G80 LCI)Facelift 2024Competition 3.0
112 kWh
Competition 4.4 V8
VS
Polestar5112 kWhvsBMWM5 (F90)Competition 4.4 V8
Max 101 kWh
AMG E 63 S
VS
XiaomiSU7Max 101 kWhvsMercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020AMG E 63 S
112 kWh
2.5 TFSI
VS
Polestar5112 kWhvsAUDIRS3 Sedan (8Y)Facelift 20242.5 TFSI
Max 101 kWh
CS 3.0
VS
XiaomiSU7Max 101 kWhvsBMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0
112 kWh
Performance 79 kWh
VS
Polestar5112 kWhvsTeslaModel 3 HighlandFacelift 2023Performance 79 kWh
Xiaomi SU7 Max 101 kWh vs Polestar 5 112 kWh - car comparison - FastVsFaster