Car comparison

XPENG P7 II 74.9 kWhvsPolestar 2 78 kWh

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

XPENG P7 II

74.9 kWh

367 hpElectricRWDAutomaticLiftback / fastback2025-present
VS

Polestar 2

78 kWh

408 hpElectricAWDAutomaticLiftback / fastback2020-2023

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Polestar 2 78 kWh

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.7 s
  • Most powerful
    408 hp
    304 kW
  • Highest torque
    660 Nm
    487 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    2,113 kg
    4,658 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    193 hp/t
    144 kW/t
    5.2 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    76/100
  • Best performance score
    72/100

XPENG P7 II 74.9 kWh

  • Fastest top speed
    240 km/h
    149 mph Unrestricted
    230 km/h
    143 mph Restricted
  • Largest trunk
    575 L
  • Best economy score
    0/100
  • Best practicality score
    83/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelXPENGP7 II74.9 kWhPolestar278 kWh
Power
367hp274kW
408hp304kW
Torque
465Nm343lb-ft
660Nm487lb-ft
Curb weight
2,125kg4,685lb
2,113kg4,658lb
Gross weight
2,575kg5,677lb
2,600kg5,732lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
205 km/h
127 mph
To 99% top speed
81.5s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
52.4s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.8s
4.7s
0-200 km/h
25.5s
Calculated
40.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.5s
Calculated
4.4s
Calculated
Quarter mile
14.0s
Calculated
13.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
173hp/t129kW/t78hp/1000 lb
Calculated
193hp/t144kW/t88hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
219Nm/t146lb-ft/ton
Calculated
312Nm/t209lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Length
5,017mm198in
4,606mm181in
Width
1,970mm78in
1,800mm71in
Height
1,427mm56in
1,479mm58in
Wheelbase
3,008mm118in
2,735mm108in
Front track
1,682mm66in
1,602mm63in
Rear track
1,682mm66in
1,601mm63in
Ground clearance
142mm6in
151mm6in
Trunk volume
575L
-
Max trunk volume
1,929L
440L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricXPENGP7 II74.9 kWhPolestar278 kWh
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.5 s
4.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.8 s
4.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
25.5 s
40.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
205 km/h
127 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.2 s
1.9 s
330 ft
101 m
6.0 s
5.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.1 s
8.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.8 s
11.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.0 s
13.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
160 km/h
100 mph
161 km/h
100 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
XPENGP7 II74.9 kWh
367 hp
274 kW
Polestar278 kWh
408 hp
304 kW

Polestar 2 78 kWh has 41 hp more than XPENG P7 II 74.9 kWh.

The biggest power difference is between XPENG P7 II 74.9 kWh and Polestar 2 78 kWh: 41 hp (31 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
XPENGP7 II74.9 kWh
465 Nm
343 lb-ft
Polestar278 kWh
660 Nm
487 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
XPENGP7 II74.9 kWh
2,125 kg
4,685 lb
Polestar278 kWh
2,113 kg
4,658 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
XPENGP7 II74.9 kWh
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Polestar278 kWh
205 km/h
127 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
XPENGP7 II74.9 kWh5.8 s
Polestar278 kWh4.7 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Polestar 2 78 kWh and XPENG P7 II 74.9 kWh: 1.1 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
XPENGP7 II74.9 kWh
173 hp/t
129 kW/t
5.8 kg/hp
Polestar278 kWh
193 hp/t
144 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
XPENGP7 II74.9 kWh
367 hp
274 kW
5.8 s
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Polestar278 kWh
408 hp
304 kW
4.7 s
205 km/h
127 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
XPENGP7 II74.9 kWh
Power
367 hp
274 kW
0-100 km/h5.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
575 L
20.3 cu ft
Length
5,017 mm
197.5 in
Height
1,427 mm
56.2 in
Polestar278 kWh
Power
408 hp
304 kW
0-100 km/h4.7 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
440 L
15.5 cu ft
Length
4,606 mm
181.3 in
Height
1,479 mm
58.2 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleXPENGP7 II74.9 kWhPolestar278 kWh
Power
367 hp
274 kW
408 hp
304 kW
Torque
465 Nm
343 lb-ft
660 Nm
487 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.8 s
4.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
205 km/h
127 mph
Lightness
2,125 kg
4,685 lb
2,113 kg
4,658 lb
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
575 L
20.3 cu ft
Length
5,017 mm
197.5 in
Height
1,427 mm
56.2 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
440 L
15.5 cu ft
Length
4,606 mm
181.3 in
Height
1,479 mm
58.2 in
Trunk score
575 L
20.3 cu ft
440 L
15.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
173 hp/t
129 kW/t
5.8 kg/hp
193 hp/t
144 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Head-to-head comparisons

XPENG P7 II 74.9 kWh

  • Has 35 km/h (22 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 135 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest

Polestar 2 78 kWh

  • Has 41 hp more
  • Has 195 Nm more
  • Is 12 kg lighter
  • Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
XPENG P7 II 74.9 kWh
Polestar 2 78 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

74.9 kWh
EQS 450 125 kWh
VS
XPENGP7 II74.9 kWhvsMercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2024EQS 450 125 kWh
78 kWh
100 kWh
VS
Polestar278 kWhvsAUDIE5 Sportback100 kWh
74.9 kWh
EQS 400 112 kWh
VS
XPENGP7 II74.9 kWhvsMercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2026EQS 400 112 kWh
78 kWh
2.9 TFSI V6
VS
Polestar278 kWhvsAUDIS7 Sportback (C8)2.9 TFSI V6
74.9 kWh
performance 100 kWh
VS
XPENGP7 II74.9 kWhvsAUDIA6 Sportback e-tron (GH)performance 100 kWh
78 kWh
EQS 500 120 kWh
VS
Polestar278 kWhvsMercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 500 120 kWh
74.9 kWh
3.0 TDI V6
VS
XPENGP7 II74.9 kWhvsAUDIS7 Sportback (C8)Facelift 20233.0 TDI V6
78 kWh
3.0 TFSI V6
VS
Polestar278 kWhvsAUDIS5 Sportback (F5)Facelift 20193.0 TFSI V6
78 kWh
100D 100 kWh
VS
Polestar278 kWhvsTeslaModel SFacelift 2016100D 100 kWh
74.9 kWh
55 TFSI V6
VS
XPENGP7 II74.9 kWhvsAUDIA7 Sportback (C8)Facelift 202355 TFSI V6
78 kWh
Mach 1 5.0 Ti-VCT V8
VS
Polestar278 kWhvsFordMustang VIFacelift 2017Mach 1 5.0 Ti-VCT V8
74.9 kWh
2.0
VS
XPENGP7 II74.9 kWhvsHondaCivic Type R (FL5)2.0
XPENG P7 II 74.9 kWh vs Polestar 2 78 kWh - car comparison - FastVsFaster