Honda Civic Type R (FL5)
Car comparison
Honda Civic Type R (FL5) 2.0vsXPENG P7 II 74.9 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonXPENG P7 II
74.9 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Honda Civic Type R (FL5) 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.4 s
- Fastest top speed285 km/h177 mph Unrestricted275 km/h171 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,405 kg3,097 lb
- Best power-to-weight234 hp/t175 kW/t4.3 kg/hp
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score72/100
- Best economy score85/100
XPENG P7 II 74.9 kWh
- Most powerful367 hp274 kW
- Highest torque465 Nm343 lb-ft
- Largest trunk575 L
- Best practicality score83/100
Specification comparison
| Model | HondaCivic Type R (FL5)2.0 | XPENGP7 II74.9 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 329hp245kW | 367hp274kW |
| Torque | 420Nm310lb-ft | 465Nm343lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,405kg3,097lb | 2,125kg4,685lb |
| Gross weight | 1,800kg3,968lb | 2,575kg5,677lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 87.9s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph Calculated | 81.5s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.4s | 5.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.2s Calculated | 25.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.1s Calculated | 5.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 13.5s Calculated | 14.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 234hp/t175kW/t106hp/1000 lb Calculated | 173hp/t129kW/t78hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 299Nm/t200lb-ft/ton Calculated | 219Nm/t146lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 580km361mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,996cc122cu in | - |
| Length | 4,594mm181in | 5,017mm198in |
| Width | 1,890mm74in | 1,970mm78in |
| Height | 1,401mm55in | 1,427mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,734mm108in | 3,008mm118in |
| Front track | 1,625mm64in | 1,682mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,623mm64in | 1,682mm66in |
| Ground clearance | - | 142mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 410L | 575L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,212L | 1,929L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 47L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | HondaCivic Type R (FL5)2.0 | XPENGP7 II74.9 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.1 s | 5.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.4 s | 5.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.2 s | 25.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.9 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.8 s | 9.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.4 s | 11.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.5 s | 14.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 174 km/h 108 mph | 160 km/h 100 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (FL5)2.0 | 329 hp 245 kW |
| XPENGP7 II74.9 kWh | 367 hp 274 kW |
XPENG P7 II 74.9 kWh has 38 hp more than Honda Civic Type R (FL5) 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Honda Civic Type R (FL5) 2.0 and XPENG P7 II 74.9 kWh: 38 hp (28 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (FL5)2.0 | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
| XPENGP7 II74.9 kWh | 465 Nm 343 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (FL5)2.0 | 1,405 kg 3,097 lb |
| XPENGP7 II74.9 kWh | 2,125 kg 4,685 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (FL5)2.0 | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph |
| XPENGP7 II74.9 kWh | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (FL5)2.0 | 5.4 s |
| XPENGP7 II74.9 kWh | 5.8 s |
Although XPENG P7 II 74.9 kWh has more power, Honda Civic Type R (FL5) 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Honda Civic Type R (FL5) 2.0 and XPENG P7 II 74.9 kWh: 0.4 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (FL5)2.0 | 234 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| XPENGP7 II74.9 kWh | 173 hp/t 129 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (FL5)2.0 | 329 hp 245 kW | 5.4 s | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph |
| XPENGP7 II74.9 kWh | 367 hp 274 kW | 5.8 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (FL5)2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| XPENGP7 II74.9 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | HondaCivic Type R (FL5)2.0 | XPENGP7 II74.9 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 329 hp 245 kW | 367 hp 274 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | 465 Nm 343 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.4 s | 5.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,405 kg 3,097 lb | 2,125 kg 4,685 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 580 km 361 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 410 L 14.5 cu ft | 575 L 20.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 234 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 173 hp/t 129 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Honda Civic Type R (FL5) 2.0 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.17 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.81 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,126 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Honda Civic Type R (FL5) 2.0
- Is 720 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 45 km/h (28 mph) higher top speed
- Has 61 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
XPENG P7 II 74.9 kWh
- Has 38 hp more
- Has 45 Nm more
- Has 165 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























