Volkswagen T-Roc I · Facelift 2022
Car comparison
Volkswagen T-Roc I · Facelift 2022 2.0 TDIvsNissan Qashqai III (J12) 1.3 DIG-T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonNissan Qashqai III (J12)
1.3 DIG-T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.6 s
- Fastest top speed201 km/h125 mph
- Highest torque360 Nm266 lb-ft
- Lightest1,486 kg3,276 lb
- Best overall score55/100
- Best performance score44/100
- Best economy score92/100
Nissan Qashqai III (J12) 1.3 DIG-T
- Most powerful158 hp118 kW
- Best power-to-weight105 hp/t78 kW/t9.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,000 km621 mi
- Largest trunk504 L
- Best practicality score84/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI | NissanQashqai III (J12)1.3 DIG-T |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 158hp118kW |
| Torque | 360Nm266lb-ft | 270Nm199lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,486kg3,276lb | 1,511kg3,331lb |
| Gross weight | 2,070kg4,564lb | 1,985kg4,376lb |
| Top speed | 201 km/h 125 mph | 199 km/h 124 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 77.0s99% target: 199 km/h / 124 mph Calculated | 86.5s99% target: 197 km/h / 122 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.6s | 9.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 90.5s Calculated | - |
| 0-60 mph | 8.1s Calculated | 8.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.3s Calculated | 16.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 101hp/t75kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated | 105hp/t78kW/t47hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 242Nm/t162lb-ft/ton Calculated | 179Nm/t120lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 982km610mi Calculated | 1,000km621mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,332cc81cu in |
| Length | 4,236mm167in | 4,425mm174in |
| Width | 1,819mm72in | 1,835mm72in |
| Height | 1,582mm62in | 1,625mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,594mm102in | 2,665mm105in |
| Front track | 1,547mm61in | 1,596mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,552mm61in | 1,602mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 392L | 504L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,237L | 1,447L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 55L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Nissan Qashqai III (J12) 1.3 DIG-T: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI | 3,500 rpm | 1,600-2,750 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
| NissanQashqai III (J12)1.3 DIG-T | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-3,750 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI | NissanQashqai III (J12)1.3 DIG-T |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.1 s | 8.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.6 s | 9.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 90.5 s | - |
| Top speed | 201 km/h 125 mph | 199 km/h 124 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.7 s | 14.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.3 s | 16.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 140 km/h 87 mph | 136 km/h 85 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW |
| NissanQashqai III (J12)1.3 DIG-T | 158 hp 118 kW |
Nissan Qashqai III (J12) 1.3 DIG-T has 8 hp more than Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TDI and Nissan Qashqai III (J12) 1.3 DIG-T: 8 hp (6 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
| NissanQashqai III (J12)1.3 DIG-T | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI | 1,486 kg 3,276 lb |
| NissanQashqai III (J12)1.3 DIG-T | 1,511 kg 3,331 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI | 201 km/h 125 mph |
| NissanQashqai III (J12)1.3 DIG-T | 199 km/h 124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI | 8.6 s |
| NissanQashqai III (J12)1.3 DIG-T | 9.2 s |
Although Nissan Qashqai III (J12) 1.3 DIG-T has more power, Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TDI and Nissan Qashqai III (J12) 1.3 DIG-T: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
| NissanQashqai III (J12)1.3 DIG-T | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp |
| NissanQashqai III (J12)1.3 DIG-T | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI | 982 km 610 mi |
| NissanQashqai III (J12)1.3 DIG-T | 1,000 km 621 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.6 s | 201 km/h 125 mph |
| NissanQashqai III (J12)1.3 DIG-T | 158 hp 118 kW | 9.2 s | 199 km/h 124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| NissanQashqai III (J12)1.3 DIG-T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI |
| 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| NissanQashqai III (J12)1.3 DIG-T |
| 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
| NissanQashqai III (J12)1.3 DIG-T | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 9.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
| NissanQashqai III (J12)1.3 DIG-T | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI | NissanQashqai III (J12)1.3 DIG-T | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 158 hp 118 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.6 s | 9.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 201 km/h 125 mph | 199 km/h 124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,486 kg 3,276 lb | 1,511 kg 3,331 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 982 km 610 mi | 1,000 km 621 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 392 L 13.8 cu ft | 504 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TDI | Nissan Qashqai III (J12) 1.3 DIG-T |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.80 LC100 km | 9.63 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.77 LC100 mi | 15.49 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 840 L222 US gal185 UK gal | 825 L218 US gal181 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,470 LC/year | 1,444 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TDI
- Has 90 Nm more
- Is 25 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Nissan Qashqai III (J12) 1.3 DIG-T
- Has 8 hp more
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 18 km (11 mi) more estimated range
- Has 112 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























