Volvo S60
Car comparison
Volvo S60 2.3 T5 20VvsNissan Cedric (Y34) 2.5T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonNissan Cedric (Y34)
2.5T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo S60 2.3 T5 20V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Highest torque330 Nm243 lb-ft
- Lightest1,537 kg3,389 lb
- Best power-to-weight163 hp/t121 kW/t6.1 kg/hp
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score58/100
Nissan Cedric (Y34) 2.5T
- Most powerful260 hp194 kW
- Best economy score73/100
- Best practicality score78/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS602.3 T5 20V | NissanCedric (Y34)2.5T |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 250hp186kW | 260hp194kW |
| Torque | 330Nm243lb-ft | 324Nm239lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,537kg3,389lb | 1,710kg3,770lb |
| Gross weight | 2,010kg4,431lb | 1,985kg4,376lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 70.5s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 72.8s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.1s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.9s Calculated | 28.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 12.5L/100 km18.8mpg US22.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.5L/100 km16.2mpg US19.5mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 163hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated | 152hp/t113kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated | 189Nm/t127lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 640km398mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,319cc142cu in | 2,498cc152cu in |
| Length | 4,576mm180in | 4,860mm191in |
| Width | 1,804mm71in | 1,770mm70in |
| Height | 1,428mm56in | 1,465mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,715mm107in | 2,800mm110in |
| Front track | 1,563mm62in | 1,510mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,560mm61in | 1,510mm59in |
| Ground clearance | - | 140mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 424L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 1,034L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 80L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S60 2.3 T5 20V: Power / Torque
- Nissan Cedric (Y34) 2.5T: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS602.3 T5 20V | 5,200 rpm | 2,400 rpm | 5,450 rpm |
| NissanCedric (Y34)2.5T | 6,400 rpm | 2,800 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS602.3 T5 20V | NissanCedric (Y34)2.5T |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.8 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.1 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.9 s | 28.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 165 km/h 102 mph | 154 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS602.3 T5 20V | 250 hp 186 kW |
| NissanCedric (Y34)2.5T | 260 hp 194 kW |
Nissan Cedric (Y34) 2.5T has 10 hp more than Volvo S60 2.3 T5 20V.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo S60 2.3 T5 20V and Nissan Cedric (Y34) 2.5T: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS602.3 T5 20V | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
| NissanCedric (Y34)2.5T | 324 Nm 239 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS602.3 T5 20V | 1,537 kg 3,389 lb |
| NissanCedric (Y34)2.5T | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS602.3 T5 20V | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| NissanCedric (Y34)2.5T | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS602.3 T5 20V | 7.1 s |
| NissanCedric (Y34)2.5T | 7.8 s |
Although Nissan Cedric (Y34) 2.5T has more power, Volvo S60 2.3 T5 20V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S60 2.3 T5 20V and Nissan Cedric (Y34) 2.5T: 0.7 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS602.3 T5 20V | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
| NissanCedric (Y34)2.5T | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS602.3 T5 20V | 250 hp 186 kW | 7.1 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| NissanCedric (Y34)2.5T | 260 hp 194 kW | 7.8 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS602.3 T5 20V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| NissanCedric (Y34)2.5T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS602.3 T5 20V | NissanCedric (Y34)2.5T | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 250 hp 186 kW | 260 hp 194 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | 324 Nm 239 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.1 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,537 kg 3,389 lb | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 640 km 398 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 424 L 15.0 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Nissan Cedric (Y34) 2.5T |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.5 L/100 km18.8 mpg US22.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.88 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 35.20 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,875 L495 US gal412 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,281 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S60 2.3 T5 20V
- Has 6 Nm more
- Is 173 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 25 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
Nissan Cedric (Y34) 2.5T
- Has 10 hp more
Pros
- Most powerful
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























